14:00:23 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
14:00:24 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 11 14:00:23 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:27 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
14:00:31 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
14:00:37 <kopecmartin> ^^^^^^ today's agenda
14:00:42 <kopecmartin> hi all , who is here today?
14:00:47 <paras333_> hey
14:00:47 <yoctozepto> \o/
14:01:01 <gmann> o/
14:02:41 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
14:02:47 <kopecmartin> I see one action from the last meeting
14:02:54 <jparoly> hi
14:03:05 <kopecmartin> gmann to check/fix the patrole gate
14:03:17 <kopecmartin> is the action from the last meeting
14:03:54 <gmann> i did not check that, I will do this week
14:04:03 <kopecmartin> sure , np, gmann thanks
14:04:13 <kopecmartin> I don't have any announcements , so we can move on
14:04:18 <kopecmartin> #link Xena Priority Items progress
14:04:23 <kopecmartin> ah
14:04:24 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress
14:04:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority
14:04:48 <kopecmartin> any updates?
14:04:55 <kopecmartin> I don't have any from the items I'm assigned to
14:05:16 <gmann> nothing from me this week.
14:05:29 <paras333_> kopecmartin: just want someone to review this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/763925
14:05:51 <paras333_> It's still WIP , but just want to have early review on the approach
14:06:08 * kopecmartin looking
14:06:09 <paras333_> it's regarding the run_validation for scenario test
14:07:19 <kopecmartin> hm, let me add that to my review list, I'll try to check it after the meeting
14:07:30 <paras333_> kopecmartin: thank you
14:08:05 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
14:08:16 <kopecmartin> nothing here, let's skip
14:08:23 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
14:08:52 <tosky> the docs job decided to stop working, but just in devstack
14:08:59 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/790649
14:09:06 <kopecmartin> tosky: yeah, there is a fix for that ^
14:09:21 <kopecmartin> it will need to be backported to wallaby too
14:09:25 <gmann> yeah, its in gate
14:09:50 <kopecmartin> any other failure you are seeing on gate?
14:09:55 <yoctozepto> remember to modify the link for branches though
14:10:15 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: oh, yeah, good point
14:10:31 <gmann> nothing from me. it was much smooth last week
14:10:42 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
14:10:52 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
14:10:57 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic
14:11:24 <kopecmartin> seems everything (mostly) is green \o/
14:11:41 <gmann> \o/
14:11:48 <paras333_> \o/
14:12:08 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
14:12:21 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
14:12:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
14:12:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open
14:12:23 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open
14:12:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
14:13:08 <kopecmartin> Any follow-ups on "Devstack dropping support for Ubuntu Bionic 18.04" discussed last week?
14:13:14 <kopecmartin> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/022141.html
14:13:16 <paras333_> nothing from hacking as of now
14:13:23 <gmann> yeah, we said 2nd week of May
14:13:25 <gmann> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/022141.html
14:13:43 <gmann> so I am thinking on 14th ?
14:14:00 <gmann> but need +A on this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/788754
14:14:07 <gmann> and I will keep my -W until 14th
14:14:24 <gmann> I think most of the projects started migrating their pending job
14:14:42 <kopecmartin> ok, sounds good
14:14:47 <kopecmartin> will check after the meeting and vote
14:14:56 <gmann> thanks
14:15:09 <kopecmartin> https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:15:17 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1  ^^
14:15:47 <kopecmartin> there are a few reviews
14:15:54 <kopecmartin> please review when possible
14:16:28 <kopecmartin> anything else from any QA sub team?
14:16:31 <gmann> is this really priority :) ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/769081
14:16:32 <yoctozepto> we could discuss https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/741807
14:16:41 <yoctozepto> are we moving towards tls-only
14:16:44 <yoctozepto> or not :-)
14:17:02 <yoctozepto> gmann: +3 definitely :-)
14:17:31 <kopecmartin> gmann:  i marked it as a priority to mark it as ready for review  basically
14:17:38 <gmann> yoctozepto: we still have setup without no-tls so I think we should merge 741807
14:18:03 <gmann> kopecmartin: oh, may be that we can check just pining in irc or I check in my dashboard for +2 ones
14:18:24 <gmann> and keeping priority one in priority list
14:18:32 <kopecmartin> i just saw lot's of reviews stuck , so i started to mark reviews which are ready with review priority +1
14:18:37 <kopecmartin> yeah, we can do that too
14:18:57 <kopecmartin> than I don't see a real usage of review priority == +1 :)
14:19:17 <yoctozepto> gmann: well, we have, but the question is whether we want to keep it ;-)
14:19:19 <gmann> there is actually.
14:19:21 <yoctozepto> see my last comment there
14:19:29 <gmann> yoctozepto: ok, let me check
14:19:50 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin: I consider +1 on ones that actually affect behaviour in some interesting way and should not really wait
14:20:05 <gmann> kopecmartin: review priority can help us to get more attention which are stuck for long
14:20:08 <yoctozepto> for this unicode change I think it would be ok to use the one reviewer rule tbh
14:20:17 <gmann> yeah
14:20:38 <kopecmartin> okey :)
14:20:47 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin: what your stance on tls
14:20:53 <yoctozepto> should we support both code paths?
14:20:58 <yoctozepto> or move to tls-only world
14:20:58 <openstackgerrit> Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/devstack stable/wallaby: Fix docs job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/790703
14:21:17 <openstackgerrit> Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/devstack stable/victoria: Fix docs job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/790704
14:21:18 <yoctozepto> tls-only is what is expected of the future anyway
14:21:26 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: i'm for it
14:21:27 <kopecmartin> yeah, agree
14:21:27 <yoctozepto> so we might be able to deprecate this and remove
14:21:34 <openstackgerrit> Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/devstack stable/ussuri: Fix docs job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/790705
14:21:42 <yoctozepto> ok, so how do we handle this in devstack?
14:21:46 <openstackgerrit> Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/devstack stable/train: Fix docs job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/790706
14:21:48 <yoctozepto> mailing list post, etc.?
14:21:56 <yoctozepto> gmann to the rescue :-)
14:22:59 <lucasagomes> kopecmartin, https://review.opendev.org/q/69a66fb62bcb77145b6eec21fc2d56d40a861d0d should be fixing the stable branches too. I changed the UC link from master to {stable version}
14:23:00 <gmann> https://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=tls-proxy%3A%20false&i=nope&files=&excludeFiles=&repos=
14:23:52 <yoctozepto> then deprecate and another community goal to ensure all projects can use tls?
14:23:57 <yoctozepto> ;d
14:24:16 <gmann> yoctozepto: +1
14:24:22 <gmann> yoctozepto: added comment in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/741807
14:24:39 <gmann> agree with frickler to add it as tempest based and periodic which we can check in QA office hour weekly
14:26:17 <kopecmartin> fine by me too
14:26:50 <kopecmartin> let's move it to periodic on tempest side then
14:27:06 <gmann> not Tempest, on devstack side itself
14:27:37 <yoctozepto> well, it does not really matter which side if it is periodic anyway ;D
14:27:49 <yoctozepto> marked to handle this later
14:28:09 <yoctozepto> thanks for the little discussion, now we know where we stand
14:28:15 <gmann> yeah but we will know where the tls-proxy code support it and why we added this a periodic
14:28:33 <yoctozepto> well, that is what the commit message is for :D
14:28:42 <yoctozepto> plus any inline comments
14:28:53 <yoctozepto> (git blame ftw though)
14:29:21 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change
14:29:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:29:53 <kopecmartin> only the doc patches there
14:30:10 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
14:31:48 <kopecmartin> seems nothing
14:31:49 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
14:31:52 <yoctozepto> also looking at rp+1
14:31:58 <yoctozepto> I guess you could remove it from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/765149
14:31:58 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena
14:32:04 * yoctozepto slow
14:32:18 <paras333_> kopecmartin: jparoly is our new contributor , so was thinking to give him some task , is this low hanging fruit tempest https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit is a good way to start?
14:32:39 <soniya29> hello
14:33:04 <paras333_> or do you guys have any other good suggestions?
14:33:50 <tosky> I'm multitasking between meetings, but (mostly for kopecmartin ) there is an interesting dependency on the unittest2 dependency in tempest, which maybe could be removed (see #rdo)
14:34:09 <kopecmartin> paras333_: uf, i'm not sure that's low hanging fruit to be honest
14:34:10 <tosky> (not related to the low-hanging fruits discussion)
14:34:31 <gmann> paras333_: those might be old bug but yes those + things in this etherpad  https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority
14:35:06 <kopecmartin> paras333_: or anyting from the list of bugs, really anything :) #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest
14:35:13 <gmann> system support or microversion might have more work
14:35:16 <paras333_> kopecmartin: ack
14:35:53 <kopecmartin> paras333_: i usually iterate and am looking for something I can move forward
14:36:53 <kopecmartin> gmann: could you review this when you have time? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/779756
14:37:07 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah, i have opened it. will do today
14:37:16 <kopecmartin> it's tricky, I wrote a long comment explaining all the facts i took into account
14:37:19 <kopecmartin> gmann: thanks
14:37:39 <kopecmartin> wdyt about this bug?
14:37:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1926403
14:37:42 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1926403 in tempest "When there is an ironic hypervisor, test_schedule_to_all_nodes cannot pass" [Undecided,In progress]
14:39:13 <gmann> kopecmartin: added comment in bug about error log/traceback
14:39:26 <gmann> fix also does not talk about it
14:39:36 <kopecmartin> yeah .. thanks
14:39:47 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side
14:39:53 <kopecmartin> anybody anything else?
14:39:57 <soniya29> yes
14:40:21 <soniya29> so regarding patrole, storyboard has many of bugs which are created 2 years back
14:41:05 <soniya29> so i am bit confused whether those bugs are issues for now as well or else we can remove them
14:41:11 <gmann> kopecmartin: also added my comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/788417
14:41:35 <gmann> soniya29: we can go one by one and see if we can close or not
14:41:47 <gmann> soniya29: i agree most of them might be like
14:43:06 <gmann> soniya29: can you add your comment in those and then I will go through sometime in this week
14:43:45 <soniya29> gmann: for some bugs I have dropped comments, so whenever you have time you can check them else I will be pass links of those bugs
14:44:09 <gmann> soniya29: great. I will check
14:44:16 <kopecmartin> I'll try to go over them too and comment , some of them will be probably not valid anymore
14:44:17 <soniya29> gmann, thank you
14:44:40 <gmann> soniya29: link will be more helpful :) so that i can open them in tabs-to-be-worked
14:44:53 <soniya29> gmann, I will pass you those links
14:45:11 <gmann> thanks
14:45:25 <kopecmartin> soniya29: great, thanks
14:45:33 <kopecmartin> if nothing else, we can close the office hour
14:45:54 <kopecmartin> thank you all for the participation!
14:45:56 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting