14:00:17 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa 14:00:18 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jun 8 14:00:17 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:19 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:22 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:00:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 14:00:32 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^ 14:00:38 <yoctozepto> o/ 14:00:46 <gmann> yoctozepto: frickler for d-g, we can plan in this cycle as official deprecation which means d-g will support until stable/wallaby only and no fix accepted for Xena onwards. 14:00:47 <gmann> o/ 14:00:56 <gmann> anyways let's discuss the plan later on d0-g 14:00:58 <gmann> d-g 14:01:06 <yoctozepto> gmann: sounds like official DROP 14:01:13 <yoctozepto> which /me likes 14:02:33 <kopecmartin> let's start 14:02:36 <kopecmartin> hi o/ 14:02:49 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item 14:02:57 <kopecmartin> no announcements from my side 14:03:18 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress 14:03:26 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority 14:03:50 <kopecmartin> hmm, we're missing the usual messages from the bot regarding the topic change 14:03:56 <kopecmartin> hopefully the meeting is being recorded 14:04:30 <paras333_> o/ 14:04:39 <kopecmartin> Regarding the Priority items i've been working on updating the NON_ACTIVE_LIST 14:04:46 <kopecmartin> #link https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/tools/generate-tempest-plugins-list.py#L37 14:04:51 <gmann> I spend some time on run-tempest on stable things and trying to reproduce bug in this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/794685/2 14:04:53 <kopecmartin> still in progress 14:05:05 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin: re no topics: it's expected 14:05:14 <yoctozepto> as long as the bot is here, it should work 14:05:23 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah, for x/ namespace in-active plugins we can just move them to non-active list 14:05:24 <kopecmartin> gmann: cool 14:05:27 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: thanks 14:05:49 <yoctozepto> in fact, it should be seen live ~> https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2021/qa.2021-06-08-14.00.log.txt 14:05:58 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin: yw 14:06:00 <kopecmartin> gmann: yup, I'll just make a note in the list, why it's there -> inactive project 14:06:16 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah +1 14:06:23 <yoctozepto> ++ 14:06:39 <kopecmartin> any other updates regarding the priority items? 14:07:29 <kopecmartin> let's move on then 14:07:32 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:07:43 <kopecmartin> nothing here, we can skip 14:07:44 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks 14:08:04 <kopecmartin> anything to share regarding gates? 14:08:29 <yoctozepto> pretty happy 14:08:39 <yoctozepto> lots of failures today due to mirrors breakage 14:08:47 <kopecmartin> and patrole gates are still failing 14:08:53 <yoctozepto> but not our fault I hope 14:09:23 <kopecmartin> hopefully not :) 14:09:25 <gmann> yeah, patrole is facing some issue, they are not policy change 14:09:36 <gmann> I think soniya pinged about their debugging this morning 14:09:55 <gmann> soniya: did you find something? 14:11:41 <kopecmartin> we can circle back to this later in the meeting, let's continue 14:11:43 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 14:11:50 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 14:11:55 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic 14:12:06 <kopecmartin> seems quite ok, nothing major 14:12:31 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights 14:12:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 14:12:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:12:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open 14:12:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open 14:12:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 14:13:13 <kopecmartin> anything from any subteam? 14:13:32 <yoctozepto> I have points for devstack/tempest in the open discussion 14:13:57 <kopecmartin> good, ok 14:13:59 <yoctozepto> and I'm on the ovn issues atm 14:14:12 <yoctozepto> to drop some oddities / technical debt 14:14:22 <kopecmartin> thanks, i think i saw a bug for that , we can discuss at the end 14:14:31 <yoctozepto> remember the default for devstack fails now for users 14:14:53 <kopecmartin> let's see Changes with Review-Priority == +1 14:15:00 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 14:15:11 <kopecmartin> one from the list is a patrole change, failing on gates 14:15:49 <kopecmartin> oh , one is from tempest and almost all gates failed 14:15:52 <kopecmartin> should we recheck? 14:16:06 <yoctozepto> the one on devstack has -1 from two cores and no feedback 14:16:11 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/755554 14:16:30 <yoctozepto> I suggest you drop cr+2,rp+1 14:16:42 <kopecmartin> I agree 14:17:08 <kopecmartin> done 14:17:28 <gmann> agree 14:17:31 <yoctozepto> thanks 14:17:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change 14:18:06 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 14:18:13 <kopecmartin> no changes here, all good 14:18:16 <yoctozepto> yay 14:18:35 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion 14:18:44 <kopecmartin> (yoctozepto) Move verify-ipv6-only-deployments 14:19:08 <yoctozepto> ok, so this is in fact because I have masakari under my supervision 14:19:14 <yoctozepto> and masakari does not use tempest 14:19:24 <yoctozepto> and this verify-ipv6-only-deployments does not really use any tempest stuff 14:19:35 <yoctozepto> it's incidental it ended up in the tempest repo 14:20:16 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22move-verify-ipv6-only-deployments%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) 14:20:33 <yoctozepto> I would at least want it in devstack where it belongs 14:20:35 <gmann> I think none of the non-tempest job use that role from tempest. 14:21:01 <yoctozepto> for clarity, it should be dropped from tempest - that could be optional 14:21:05 <gmann> It make sense to move to devstack side, I will check both review in case it is breaking anyone and we need to care about 14:21:10 <gmann> but agree on this direction 14:21:14 <yoctozepto> ok, thanks 14:21:21 <yoctozepto> I think I checked everything 14:21:33 <yoctozepto> to drop from tempest we need to backport to all stable branches of devstack 14:21:36 <yoctozepto> that's why there is w-1 14:21:38 <gmann> yeah, in my quick search also it seems no one using 14:21:43 <yoctozepto> anyhow, the gate should stop us 14:21:48 <yoctozepto> but w-1 for extra safety 14:22:00 <gmann> yoctozepto: I think we should do that otherwise it create issue like process-stackviz 14:22:10 <yoctozepto> indeed 14:22:15 <gmann> but yes we need to see how stable branch using old tempest will work 14:22:24 <gmann> I will review this today or tomorrow 14:22:25 <yoctozepto> gmann: train is still on master no? 14:22:42 <gmann> yoctozepto: it is but soon it will be on new tempest tag 14:22:44 <yoctozepto> this script is train+ only 14:22:52 <gmann> so doing this before that will help 14:22:56 <yoctozepto> indeed 14:23:01 * yoctozepto catching the wave 14:23:10 <yoctozepto> any thoughts from kopecmartin? 14:23:16 <gmann> yoctozepto: yes that is train goal https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/train/ipv6-support-and-testing.html 14:23:25 <gmann> yoctozepto: good timing. 14:23:39 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: i believe you :) .. yeah , i agree that stuff can be moved to devstack .. I will do the review too 14:23:57 <yoctozepto> thanks, both of you! 14:24:01 <yoctozepto> we can move to the next topic 14:24:23 <kopecmartin> anything from anyone? 14:24:31 <kopecmartin> (if not i have a few bugs to discuss) 14:24:45 <yoctozepto> yes, my 2nd entry ;p 14:24:51 <yoctozepto> but I see it's merging 14:24:55 <yoctozepto> so not much to discuss :D 14:25:01 <yoctozepto> (yoctozepto) Drop CentOS Linux 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/795160 14:25:02 * kopecmartin is refreshing the agenda 14:25:06 <kopecmartin> oh 14:25:06 <gmann> yoctozepto: I have approved the centos drop which is as per xena cycle testing runtime 14:25:19 <kopecmartin> i should do this at the beginning of the meeting next time 14:25:22 <yoctozepto> well, not merging because of depends-on 14:25:24 <gmann> I somehow missed the depends-on early 14:25:30 <yoctozepto> ;D 14:25:43 <gmann> yeah if cinder block and it would not merge anyways so we are fine 14:25:49 <yoctozepto> I need to bug the cinder team more 14:25:53 <gmann> +1 14:25:59 <yoctozepto> they should like it because it turns RED into GREEN 14:27:08 <gmann> yeah 14:27:45 <kopecmartin> good .. so now anything else from anyone? 14:28:07 <gmann> nothing from me, nee dot hurry up for my internal meeting.. 14:28:10 <yoctozepto> I think they would speak earlier already 14:28:14 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage 14:28:23 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena 14:28:30 <kopecmartin> numbers recorded as always 14:28:41 <kopecmartin> i wanted to talk about a few devstack bugs (recently added) 14:28:48 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1931152 14:28:49 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1931152 in devstack "basic installation fails due to git clone errors" [Undecided,New] 14:29:01 <kopecmartin> is that ^^ related to the network issues yoctozepto mentioned? 14:29:15 <yoctozepto> checking 14:29:29 <yoctozepto> no, it's something else 14:29:36 <yoctozepto> but likely something on the user side 14:30:38 <kopecmartin> ok, I will check then and try to comment 14:31:09 <kopecmartin> description is too general , none of the jobs is failing, so probably nothing major 14:31:25 <kopecmartin> then there is this ovn bug 14:31:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1930764 14:31:29 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1930764 in devstack "Weird during installation [OVN]" [Undecided,New] 14:32:10 <yoctozepto> interesting 14:32:14 <yoctozepto> not encountered that 14:33:32 <kopecmartin> should we ping someone from ovn team? 14:34:22 <yoctozepto> Jun 03 22:58:02 vmd75777.contaboserver.net ovsdb-server[15459]: ovs|00002|lockfile|WARN|/etc/openvswitch/.ovnnb_db.db.~lock~: cannot lock file because it is already locked by pid 13 14:34:39 <yoctozepto> looks like a race condition 14:34:45 <yoctozepto> or bad cleanup? 14:35:47 <yoctozepto> it doesn't seem like something on our side 14:35:59 <yoctozepto> unless we trigger the bad cleanup situation that we could avoid 14:36:21 <kopecmartin> yeah .. in that case it would be easily reproducible 14:36:31 <tosky> yoctozepto: I've seen the cinder-tempest-plugin review but I just had no time to check that 14:36:36 <tosky> I'm going to do it today 14:36:40 <yoctozepto> tosky: thanks! 14:36:56 <kopecmartin> ok, and the last bug: 14:36:58 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1930278 14:36:59 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1930278 in devstack "DevStack installation on RHEL 8.3 fails" [Undecided,New] 14:37:18 <yoctozepto> "not supported, buh-bye" 14:37:22 <kopecmartin> it's a failure on a non supported release .. 14:37:29 <kopecmartin> yeah, so mark it as invalid or whishlist? 14:37:54 <yoctozepto> your call 14:38:05 <yoctozepto> I'm definitely not doing anything about it 14:38:52 <kopecmartin> neither me .. but if anyone would like to, they can, so let's mark it as wishlist 14:39:11 <kopecmartin> it's more welcoming to a contributor than invalid state 14:39:18 <kopecmartin> good, that's all from my side 14:39:21 <yoctozepto> indeed 14:39:23 <kopecmartin> anything else to discuss? 14:39:31 <yoctozepto> nothing from me, thanks 14:39:54 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: thank you 14:39:56 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting