14:00:17 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
14:00:18 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jun  8 14:00:17 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:19 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:22 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
14:00:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
14:00:32 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^
14:00:38 <yoctozepto> o/
14:00:46 <gmann> yoctozepto: frickler for d-g, we can plan in this cycle as official deprecation which means d-g will support until stable/wallaby only and no fix accepted for Xena onwards.
14:00:47 <gmann> o/
14:00:56 <gmann> anyways let's discuss the plan later on d0-g
14:00:58 <gmann> d-g
14:01:06 <yoctozepto> gmann: sounds like official DROP
14:01:13 <yoctozepto> which /me likes
14:02:33 <kopecmartin> let's start
14:02:36 <kopecmartin> hi o/
14:02:49 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item
14:02:57 <kopecmartin> no announcements from my side
14:03:18 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress
14:03:26 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority
14:03:50 <kopecmartin> hmm, we're missing the usual messages from the bot regarding the topic change
14:03:56 <kopecmartin> hopefully the meeting is being recorded
14:04:30 <paras333_> o/
14:04:39 <kopecmartin> Regarding the Priority items i've been working on updating the NON_ACTIVE_LIST
14:04:46 <kopecmartin> #link https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/tools/generate-tempest-plugins-list.py#L37
14:04:51 <gmann> I spend some time on run-tempest on stable things and trying to reproduce bug in this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/794685/2
14:04:53 <kopecmartin> still in progress
14:05:05 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin: re no topics: it's expected
14:05:14 <yoctozepto> as long as the bot is here, it should work
14:05:23 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah, for x/ namespace in-active plugins we can just move them to non-active list
14:05:24 <kopecmartin> gmann: cool
14:05:27 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: thanks
14:05:49 <yoctozepto> in fact, it should be seen live ~> https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2021/qa.2021-06-08-14.00.log.txt
14:05:58 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin: yw
14:06:00 <kopecmartin> gmann: yup, I'll just make a note in the list, why it's there -> inactive project
14:06:16 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah +1
14:06:23 <yoctozepto> ++
14:06:39 <kopecmartin> any other updates regarding the priority items?
14:07:29 <kopecmartin> let's move on then
14:07:32 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
14:07:43 <kopecmartin> nothing here, we can skip
14:07:44 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
14:08:04 <kopecmartin> anything to share regarding gates?
14:08:29 <yoctozepto> pretty happy
14:08:39 <yoctozepto> lots of failures today due to mirrors breakage
14:08:47 <kopecmartin> and patrole gates are still failing
14:08:53 <yoctozepto> but not our fault I hope
14:09:23 <kopecmartin> hopefully not :)
14:09:25 <gmann> yeah, patrole is facing some issue, they are not policy change
14:09:36 <gmann> I think soniya pinged about their debugging this morning
14:09:55 <gmann> soniya: did you find something?
14:11:41 <kopecmartin> we can circle back to this later in the meeting, let's continue
14:11:43 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
14:11:50 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
14:11:55 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic
14:12:06 <kopecmartin> seems quite ok, nothing major
14:12:31 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
14:12:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
14:12:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
14:12:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open
14:12:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open
14:12:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
14:13:13 <kopecmartin> anything from any subteam?
14:13:32 <yoctozepto> I have points for devstack/tempest in the open discussion
14:13:57 <kopecmartin> good, ok
14:13:59 <yoctozepto> and I'm on the ovn issues atm
14:14:12 <yoctozepto> to drop some oddities / technical debt
14:14:22 <kopecmartin> thanks, i think i saw a bug for that , we can discuss at the end
14:14:31 <yoctozepto> remember the default for devstack fails now for users
14:14:53 <kopecmartin> let's see Changes with Review-Priority == +1
14:15:00 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:15:11 <kopecmartin> one from the list is a patrole change, failing on gates
14:15:49 <kopecmartin> oh , one is from tempest and almost all gates failed
14:15:52 <kopecmartin> should we recheck?
14:16:06 <yoctozepto> the one on devstack has -1 from two cores and no feedback
14:16:11 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/755554
14:16:30 <yoctozepto> I suggest you drop cr+2,rp+1
14:16:42 <kopecmartin> I agree
14:17:08 <kopecmartin> done
14:17:28 <gmann> agree
14:17:31 <yoctozepto> thanks
14:17:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change
14:18:06 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:18:13 <kopecmartin> no changes here, all good
14:18:16 <yoctozepto> yay
14:18:35 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
14:18:44 <kopecmartin> (yoctozepto) Move verify-ipv6-only-deployments
14:19:08 <yoctozepto> ok, so this is in fact because I have masakari under my supervision
14:19:14 <yoctozepto> and masakari does not use tempest
14:19:24 <yoctozepto> and this verify-ipv6-only-deployments does not really use any tempest stuff
14:19:35 <yoctozepto> it's incidental it ended up in the tempest repo
14:20:16 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22move-verify-ipv6-only-deployments%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
14:20:33 <yoctozepto> I would at least want it in devstack where it belongs
14:20:35 <gmann> I think none of the non-tempest job use that role from tempest.
14:21:01 <yoctozepto> for clarity, it should be dropped from tempest - that could be optional
14:21:05 <gmann> It make sense to move to devstack side, I will check both review in case it is breaking anyone and we need to care about
14:21:10 <gmann> but agree on this direction
14:21:14 <yoctozepto> ok, thanks
14:21:21 <yoctozepto> I think I checked everything
14:21:33 <yoctozepto> to drop from tempest we need to backport to all stable branches of devstack
14:21:36 <yoctozepto> that's why there is w-1
14:21:38 <gmann> yeah, in my quick search also it seems no one using
14:21:43 <yoctozepto> anyhow, the gate should stop us
14:21:48 <yoctozepto> but w-1 for extra safety
14:22:00 <gmann> yoctozepto: I think we should do that otherwise it create issue like process-stackviz
14:22:10 <yoctozepto> indeed
14:22:15 <gmann> but yes we need to see how stable branch using old tempest will work
14:22:24 <gmann> I will review this today or tomorrow
14:22:25 <yoctozepto> gmann: train is still on master no?
14:22:42 <gmann> yoctozepto: it is but soon it will be on new tempest tag
14:22:44 <yoctozepto> this script is train+ only
14:22:52 <gmann> so doing this before that will help
14:22:56 <yoctozepto> indeed
14:23:01 * yoctozepto catching the wave
14:23:10 <yoctozepto> any thoughts from kopecmartin?
14:23:16 <gmann> yoctozepto: yes that is train goal https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/train/ipv6-support-and-testing.html
14:23:25 <gmann> yoctozepto: good timing.
14:23:39 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: i believe you :) .. yeah , i agree that stuff can be moved to devstack .. I will do the review too
14:23:57 <yoctozepto> thanks, both of you!
14:24:01 <yoctozepto> we can move to the next topic
14:24:23 <kopecmartin> anything from anyone?
14:24:31 <kopecmartin> (if not i have a few bugs to discuss)
14:24:45 <yoctozepto> yes, my 2nd entry ;p
14:24:51 <yoctozepto> but I see it's merging
14:24:55 <yoctozepto> so not much to discuss :D
14:25:01 <yoctozepto> (yoctozepto) Drop CentOS Linux 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/795160
14:25:02 * kopecmartin is refreshing the agenda
14:25:06 <kopecmartin> oh
14:25:06 <gmann> yoctozepto: I have approved the centos drop which is as per xena cycle testing runtime
14:25:19 <kopecmartin> i should do this at the beginning of the meeting next time
14:25:22 <yoctozepto> well, not merging because of depends-on
14:25:24 <gmann> I somehow missed the depends-on early
14:25:30 <yoctozepto> ;D
14:25:43 <gmann> yeah if cinder block and it would not merge anyways so we are fine
14:25:49 <yoctozepto> I need to bug the cinder team more
14:25:53 <gmann> +1
14:25:59 <yoctozepto> they should like it because it turns RED into GREEN
14:27:08 <gmann> yeah
14:27:45 <kopecmartin> good .. so now anything else from anyone?
14:28:07 <gmann> nothing from me, nee dot hurry up for my internal meeting..
14:28:10 <yoctozepto> I think they would speak earlier already
14:28:14 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
14:28:23 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena
14:28:30 <kopecmartin> numbers recorded as always
14:28:41 <kopecmartin> i wanted to talk about a few devstack bugs (recently added)
14:28:48 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1931152
14:28:49 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1931152 in devstack "basic installation fails due to git clone errors" [Undecided,New]
14:29:01 <kopecmartin> is that ^^ related to the network issues yoctozepto mentioned?
14:29:15 <yoctozepto> checking
14:29:29 <yoctozepto> no, it's something else
14:29:36 <yoctozepto> but likely something on the user side
14:30:38 <kopecmartin> ok, I will check then and try to comment
14:31:09 <kopecmartin> description is too general , none of the jobs is failing, so probably nothing major
14:31:25 <kopecmartin> then there is this ovn bug
14:31:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1930764
14:31:29 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1930764 in devstack "Weird during installation [OVN]" [Undecided,New]
14:32:10 <yoctozepto> interesting
14:32:14 <yoctozepto> not encountered that
14:33:32 <kopecmartin> should we ping someone from ovn team?
14:34:22 <yoctozepto> Jun 03 22:58:02 vmd75777.contaboserver.net ovsdb-server[15459]: ovs|00002|lockfile|WARN|/etc/openvswitch/.ovnnb_db.db.~lock~: cannot lock file because it is already locked by pid 13
14:34:39 <yoctozepto> looks like a race condition
14:34:45 <yoctozepto> or bad cleanup?
14:35:47 <yoctozepto> it doesn't seem like something on our side
14:35:59 <yoctozepto> unless we trigger the bad cleanup situation that we could avoid
14:36:21 <kopecmartin> yeah .. in that case it would be easily reproducible
14:36:31 <tosky> yoctozepto: I've seen the cinder-tempest-plugin review but I just had no time to check that
14:36:36 <tosky> I'm going to do it today
14:36:40 <yoctozepto> tosky: thanks!
14:36:56 <kopecmartin> ok, and the last bug:
14:36:58 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1930278
14:36:59 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1930278 in devstack "DevStack installation on RHEL 8.3 fails" [Undecided,New]
14:37:18 <yoctozepto> "not supported, buh-bye"
14:37:22 <kopecmartin> it's a failure on a non supported release ..
14:37:29 <kopecmartin> yeah, so mark it as invalid or whishlist?
14:37:54 <yoctozepto> your call
14:38:05 <yoctozepto> I'm definitely not doing anything about it
14:38:52 <kopecmartin> neither me .. but if anyone would like to, they can, so let's mark it as wishlist
14:39:11 <kopecmartin> it's more welcoming to a contributor than invalid state
14:39:18 <kopecmartin> good, that's all from my side
14:39:21 <yoctozepto> indeed
14:39:23 <kopecmartin> anything else to discuss?
14:39:31 <yoctozepto> nothing from me, thanks
14:39:54 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: thank you
14:39:56 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting