14:00:05 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa 14:00:05 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jul 27 14:00:05 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:05 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:05 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:00:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 14:00:19 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^ 14:00:25 <yoctozepto> o/ 14:00:41 <gmann> o/ 14:02:15 <kopecmartin> hi all 14:02:21 <kopecmartin> let's satrt 14:02:22 <kopecmartin> start 14:02:27 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item 14:02:35 <kopecmartin> I'll be on vacation the whole next week 14:02:45 <jparoly> o/ 14:02:56 <kopecmartin> i won't have access to email, irc anything (after a very long time :D ) 14:03:13 <kopecmartin> can you gmann moderate the meeting? 14:03:19 <kopecmartin> or should we cancel? 14:03:21 <gmann> kopecmartin: sure 14:03:52 <kopecmartin> gmann: thanks! 14:04:06 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side on announcements 14:04:36 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress 14:04:41 <kopecmartin> any updates? 14:05:30 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority 14:05:36 <kopecmartin> priority items etherpad ^^ 14:05:42 <gmann> started tempest removal from u-c for testing tempest plugin with master version 14:05:48 <gmann> but need more testing for this 14:06:24 <gmann> on system scope in devstack/tempest- few config setting the scope are merged for few services 14:06:57 <gmann> I am debugging on nova to move completely yo system/project scope first in devstack and then tempest. 14:07:20 <gmann> in some n-v job and rest all existing jobs keep running same way as they are doing currently 14:07:41 <gmann> that is all from me 14:07:54 <kopecmartin> thank you gmann 14:09:27 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:09:38 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-ptg 14:09:52 <kopecmartin> we don't have any topics yet ..although there's plenty of time to add some 14:10:00 <kopecmartin> and i'm sure will add some overtime 14:10:21 <gmann> yeah, we should start filling it though we have time 14:10:42 <gmann> I will add system scope thing to continue discuss or check status 14:10:49 <kopecmartin> the time slots for qa are picked, seems we're on track for now (only the topics to discuss are missing for now) 14:10:59 <kopecmartin> gmann: good, thanks 14:11:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks 14:12:02 <kopecmartin> any issues? 14:12:24 <kopecmartin> i've noticed there was an issue with the docs job, however, that's fixed already 14:12:39 <gmann> yeah 14:13:07 <gmann> few projects might be failing in cinder v2 removed from python-cinderclient but it is easy fix for them to move to v3 14:13:29 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 14:13:36 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 14:13:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic 14:13:48 <kopecmartin> periodic jobs are green 14:14:12 <kopecmartin> gmann: oh .. good 14:14:35 <gmann> tempest/devstack is all good on that as taken care in advance 14:15:34 <kopecmartin> there is one issue with run-tempest-26 .. although i haven't figured out why yet 14:15:47 <kopecmartin> but this job is failing since that role is used in stein 14:16:03 <kopecmartin> and i think it's because the environment is recreated: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/d133896d1e114c9cacfb5aee022dd3e2/log/job-output.txt#37048 14:16:05 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/d133896d1e114c9cacfb5aee022dd3e2/log/job-output.txt#37048 14:16:10 <gmann> yeah, i was tryig to debug that 14:16:17 <kopecmartin> which is the only difference 14:16:26 <gmann> seems constraints mismatch is forcing them to recreate venv 14:16:33 <gmann> I will check after meeting and see 14:16:44 <gmann> but is it happening in all stable with plugins? 14:17:06 <gmann> I tested devstack/tempest stable jobs but i think i did not test stable with plugins 14:17:18 <kopecmartin> i've seen that only in watcher-tempest-plugin 14:17:23 <gmann> k 14:17:40 <kopecmartin> however i didn't check others, so it may happen in some other plugin too 14:18:00 <gmann> I will add some testing patch and see 14:18:09 <gmann> I am sure it is constraints things 14:19:23 <kopecmartin> makes sense, i didn't find anything wrong in the role itself 14:19:25 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights 14:19:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 14:19:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:19:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open 14:19:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open 14:19:39 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 14:19:41 <kopecmartin> any updates from any subteam? 14:19:56 <kopecmartin> what will we do with patrole? 14:20:02 <gmann> I started debugging the patrol failure. did recheck for fresh failure and will continue today 14:20:21 <gmann> kopecmartin: let's see if I can make patrole green by this week 14:20:26 <kopecmartin> thank you for that! 14:20:37 <yoctozepto> there was some fedora on devstack stuff last week 14:20:40 <yoctozepto> or rather devstack on fedora 14:22:03 <kopecmartin> and what's the status? any help needed? 14:22:05 <yoctozepto> ah no, it was yesterday 14:22:06 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/795640 14:22:13 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/802223 14:22:19 * kopecmartin checking 14:22:34 <yoctozepto> should we drop the old jobs and definitions? 14:22:40 <yoctozepto> I think that's what we did the last time 14:23:02 <yoctozepto> yup 14:23:03 <yoctozepto> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/755449 14:23:40 <yoctozepto> so I guess let's remove again? 14:23:44 <yoctozepto> fedora only on master 14:23:54 <yoctozepto> we could document that somewhere I guess... 14:24:12 <gmann> yoctozepto: these patch are moving current job right not adding new? 14:24:17 <yoctozepto> yeah 14:24:21 <yoctozepto> as always 14:24:27 <gmann> yeah 14:24:31 <kopecmartin> yeah, let's do that again .. if fedora 32 is eol, there is no sense to run it in older releases 14:24:41 <gmann> 'should we drop the old jobs and definitions?' I did nt get this 14:24:53 <gmann> on stable 14:24:55 <gmann> ? 14:24:58 <yoctozepto> gmann: we need to go to stable branches and drop the job and nodeset 14:24:59 <yoctozepto> yes 14:25:02 <gmann> ohk 14:25:20 <yoctozepto> I will do it then 14:25:24 <yoctozepto> thanks for confirming 14:25:31 <gmann> we usually do not update the version in stable 14:25:37 <kopecmartin> yoctozepto: thanks 14:25:44 <yoctozepto> yeah, we could just remove fedora on branching ;-) 14:25:46 <gmann> but if they start failing then yes removal is only option 14:25:52 <gmann> +1 14:27:18 <kopecmartin> moving on, i don't see any patches with priority +1 nor +2 14:27:19 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 14:27:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 14:27:30 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion 14:27:35 <kopecmartin> anything from anyone? 14:27:50 <yoctozepto> not from me 14:29:15 <gmann> nothing from me 14:29:17 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage 14:29:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena 14:29:27 <kopecmartin> numbers are recorded as always 14:29:39 <kopecmartin> there is a new bug on devstack 14:29:40 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1938151 14:29:56 <kopecmartin> which might be caused by a lately merged patch 14:30:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/788056 14:31:30 <yoctozepto> interesting 14:32:25 <gmann> I think that is what brtknr mentioned in channel too 14:32:47 <soniya29|rover> gmann, kopecmartin, I don't have much updates but just to say, patches are continuosly failing on patrole 14:32:49 <gmann> is it again size quota? 14:33:03 <gmann> soniya29|rover: yeah, i will look into that this week 14:33:08 <gmann> dansmith: ^^ 14:33:11 <brtknr> gmann: yep it was mentioned 14:33:13 <soniya29|rover> multiple rechecks is also not helping them 14:33:14 <gmann> I have not checked yet 14:33:52 <dansmith> log link? 14:34:08 <gmann> dansmith: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1938151 14:34:29 <dansmith> okay will look 14:34:42 <kopecmartin> soniya29|rover: yeah, there is an issue somewhere, i was able to get a passing review if i skipped a few tests 14:35:12 <gmann> thanks 14:36:21 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side regarding bug triage 14:36:39 <kopecmartin> anything else to discuss? 14:36:58 <gmann> nothing from me 14:37:11 <kopecmartin> let's close the office hour then 14:37:18 <kopecmartin> thank you all for attending 14:37:27 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting