14:00:10 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa 14:00:11 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Sep 7 14:00:10 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:11 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:11 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:00:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 14:00:20 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^ 14:00:24 <kopecmartin> hi all o/ 14:00:37 <gmann> o/ 14:02:27 <kopecmartin> let's start 14:02:28 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 14:03:02 <kopecmartin> PTL Campaigning is ongoing 14:03:14 <kopecmartin> however for tempest there was just one candidate 14:03:16 <kopecmartin> me :) 14:03:34 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ 14:03:48 <kopecmartin> I don't have other announcements 14:04:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress 14:04:07 <yoctozepto> o/ 14:04:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority 14:04:19 <kopecmartin> any updates on these? 14:04:21 <kopecmartin> hi yoctozepto 14:04:31 <yoctozepto> hi kopecmartin 14:04:51 <jparoly> o/ 14:06:15 <kopecmartin> regarding tempest RBAC effort, I'd like to do a few experiments with tempest on a RBAC enabled system 14:06:39 <kopecmartin> is there a doc, which explains what options in local.conf need to be set in order to deploy? 14:06:47 <kopecmartin> i should probably know it 14:06:52 <gmann> I think I have one job there but not merged 14:06:58 <gmann> let me check 14:07:52 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/614484 14:07:59 <gmann> I need to enable it more in tat 14:08:00 <gmann> that 14:08:13 <gmann> and devstack already run another job in gate 14:08:39 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/804263 14:09:09 <gmann> devstack is more of just installation only. and tempest one will run test too but that need more work 14:09:52 <kopecmartin> thanks, i'll copy the config and will try to deploy on my local system so that i can debug tempest , see what's working and what's not 14:10:05 <gmann> sure, +1 14:10:29 <kopecmartin> moving on 14:10:29 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:10:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-ptg 14:10:39 <kopecmartin> the etherpad for the PTG topics 14:10:46 <kopecmartin> I added a few topics there 14:10:51 <kopecmartin> feel free to add your proposals there as well 14:12:46 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks 14:12:56 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 14:13:01 <kopecmartin> any issues to bring up? 14:13:06 <kopecmartin> don't see any urgent patches 14:13:47 <gmann> I am still working on patrole gate, network tests are passing. new image test start failing on policy change 14:14:08 <gmann> volume and image test need fix and after that we can do release. I will spend time today on those 14:14:26 <gmann> other than that I think no current gate issue 14:14:45 <kopecmartin> good, thanks 14:14:54 <kopecmartin> we'll do a major release, right, 29.0.0? 14:15:11 <gmann> yeah, for tempest. and with tox.ini change etc 14:15:23 <gmann> did you see anything we should wait for? 14:15:29 * gmann checking open patches 14:16:10 <kopecmartin> we might wanna decide what to do with the test_minimum_basic test 14:16:11 <gmann> I do not find any so we are all good 14:16:29 <kopecmartin> i'll check too, but there isn't anything critical i think 14:16:34 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah but that can go later too. but anyways I am reviwing that 14:17:01 <kopecmartin> me too, i'll bring it up in a minute 14:17:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 14:17:09 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 14:17:14 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic 14:17:21 <kopecmartin> all green \o/ 14:17:48 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights 14:17:53 <kopecmartin> any updates, highlights we need to discuss today ? 14:18:03 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1 14:18:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 14:18:09 <kopecmartin> there are none 14:18:20 <kopecmartin> I wanted to bring up this 14:18:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/804107 14:18:48 <kopecmartin> i pinged also afazekas about it because i can't decide if i'm for or against .. 14:19:03 <kopecmartin> my main question is, is it safe to expand a functionality of that scenario test 14:19:03 <kopecmartin> ? 14:19:09 <afazekas> kopecmartin, Answered on the review. BTW you can ping me on this channel ;-) 14:19:23 <kopecmartin> afazekas: thanks 14:19:28 <kopecmartin> good to know, thank you :) 14:19:59 * kopecmartin reading the comment 14:20:18 <kopecmartin> cool, looks ok then 14:20:39 <kopecmartin> i wasn't sure if we can expect snapshot support on every environment the scenario test might be executed on 14:20:48 <kopecmartin> that was my main concern 14:21:15 <kopecmartin> as was also raised by sean-k-mooney 14:21:23 <kopecmartin> in the comments 14:22:11 <gmann> kopecmartin: as you brought the config option for snapshot, I think it make sense to do it in separate test 14:22:14 <gmann> commented in review 14:22:21 <kopecmartin> although i agree that creating a new test just for that is quite an overkill , it would be a duplication of that minimal test 14:22:23 <afazekas> kopecmartin, AFAIK the nova backand support is shrieked, not all backend supported it in the past . 14:22:52 <gmann> kopecmartin: it does not need to be exact duplicate 14:23:33 <gmann> we can just do 1. boot server 2. attach volume 3. write volume & snapshot 4. reboot server 5. check timestamp 14:23:46 <gmann> but more or less doing most of part same 14:25:32 <gmann> so I changed my vote now and going with the new test 14:25:58 <kopecmartin> so it would be basically TestMinimumBasicScenario just without security group work and of course plus the new additions (timestamp and snapshot) 14:26:24 <gmann> yeah, I think most of scenario test need most of these steps except reboot 14:26:39 <afazekas> kopecmartin, https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/support-matrix.html "Attach block volume to multiple instances" makes it incompatble with the exotic drivers, the snapshot does not seams to increase the incompatibility 14:27:17 <gmann> afazekas: that test doing volume snapshot via cinder API not server snapshot 14:27:50 <gmann> but we do have config option for that to handle such incompatibility 14:28:20 <afazekas> gmann, yes, BTW,AFAIK the nfs is assisted snapshot, nova does extra loops with cinder 14:28:45 <gmann> ah yes, that is true. 14:29:32 <kopecmartin> thank you for the good comments, i'm glad we sorted that out 14:29:33 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion 14:29:43 * afazekas copied wrong action name, the good one "Attach block volume to multiple instances" 14:29:50 <kopecmartin> anything else to discuss? 14:30:30 <kopecmartin> meanwhile 14:30:31 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage 14:30:35 <gmann> kopecmartin: on release things 14:30:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena 14:30:47 <kopecmartin> gmann: oh, right 14:31:04 <gmann> we need to check with release timing to start QA part on devstack/grenade etc 14:31:14 <gmann> I can help on this if you need 14:32:00 <kopecmartin> yeah sure, when do we wanna start ? 14:33:12 <gmann> I need to check the release timing on what step they are 14:33:45 <gmann> I can check and push WIP sometime today or tomorrow 14:33:45 <kopecmartin> get it 14:34:08 <gmann> and tempest release we want to do now or want to wait for the scenario test ? 14:34:33 <gmann> I think we are good and can release with current hash 14:34:42 <kopecmartin> let's wait a little, if the patch gets updated soon, we can wait, if not let's move forward without it 14:35:03 <gmann> ok, sure, we have time till 13th I think which is deadline 14:35:21 <kopecmartin> ok 14:35:28 <gmann> but doing in this week will be good 14:35:34 <kopecmartin> agree 14:35:41 <gmann> cool 14:36:07 <kopecmartin> ok then, anything else? 14:36:25 <tosky> back to open discussion... 14:36:29 <tosky> just one question: if you remember, devstack-plugin-ceph is now branched, but only starting from train; an upcoming change is going to break stein for sure, can we request a branch for stein too (probably starting from the branching point of train)? 14:39:32 <kopecmartin> i think we can, seems like we don't have a choice 14:39:33 <gmann> tosky: sure, we can do if master is not working and EM of stable/stein team can work on that 14:40:17 <tosky> gmann: after this change, it won't work for sure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/807706 14:40:29 <gmann> ok 14:40:30 <tosky> can I simply propose the new branch to the release team, adding you all in cc? 14:40:44 <gmann> +1, works fine 14:41:08 <tosky> ack, thanks! 14:43:51 <gmann> moving to bugs? 14:44:11 <kopecmartin> sure 14:44:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena#L5 14:44:23 <kopecmartin> i have recorded the nubmers as alwyas 14:44:30 <kopecmartin> i don't have anything else to bring up 14:45:35 <gmann> yeah, did not see any critical bugs. 14:45:38 <gmann> I am good too on this 14:46:56 <kopecmartin> ok, so it seems we're at the end 14:47:02 <gmann> yeah 14:47:06 <kopecmartin> let's close the office hour then 14:47:08 <kopecmartin> thank you all 14:47:09 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting