14:00:10 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
14:00:11 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Sep  7 14:00:10 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:11 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:11 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
14:00:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
14:00:20 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^
14:00:24 <kopecmartin> hi all o/
14:00:37 <gmann> o/
14:02:27 <kopecmartin> let's start
14:02:28 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
14:03:02 <kopecmartin> PTL Campaigning is ongoing
14:03:14 <kopecmartin> however for tempest there was just one candidate
14:03:16 <kopecmartin> me :)
14:03:34 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/
14:03:48 <kopecmartin> I don't have other announcements
14:04:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress
14:04:07 <yoctozepto> o/
14:04:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority
14:04:19 <kopecmartin> any updates on these?
14:04:21 <kopecmartin> hi yoctozepto
14:04:31 <yoctozepto> hi kopecmartin
14:04:51 <jparoly> o/
14:06:15 <kopecmartin> regarding tempest RBAC effort, I'd like to do a few experiments with tempest on a RBAC enabled system
14:06:39 <kopecmartin> is there a doc, which explains what options in local.conf need to be set in order to deploy?
14:06:47 <kopecmartin> i should probably know it
14:06:52 <gmann> I think I have one job there but not merged
14:06:58 <gmann> let me check
14:07:52 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/614484
14:07:59 <gmann> I need to enable it more in tat
14:08:00 <gmann> that
14:08:13 <gmann> and devstack already run another job in gate
14:08:39 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/804263
14:09:09 <gmann> devstack is more of just installation only. and tempest one will run test too but that need more work
14:09:52 <kopecmartin> thanks, i'll copy the config and will try to deploy on my local system so that i can debug tempest , see what's working and what's not
14:10:05 <gmann> sure, +1
14:10:29 <kopecmartin> moving on
14:10:29 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
14:10:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-ptg
14:10:39 <kopecmartin> the etherpad for the PTG topics
14:10:46 <kopecmartin> I added a few topics there
14:10:51 <kopecmartin> feel free to add your proposals there as well
14:12:46 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
14:12:56 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:13:01 <kopecmartin> any issues to bring up?
14:13:06 <kopecmartin> don't see any urgent patches
14:13:47 <gmann> I am still working on patrole gate, network tests are passing. new image test start failing on policy change
14:14:08 <gmann> volume and image test need fix and after that we can do release. I will spend time today on those
14:14:26 <gmann> other than that I think no current gate issue
14:14:45 <kopecmartin> good, thanks
14:14:54 <kopecmartin> we'll do a major release, right, 29.0.0?
14:15:11 <gmann> yeah, for tempest. and with tox.ini change etc
14:15:23 <gmann> did you see anything we should wait for?
14:15:29 * gmann checking open patches
14:16:10 <kopecmartin> we might wanna decide what to do with the test_minimum_basic test
14:16:11 <gmann> I do not find any so we are all good
14:16:29 <kopecmartin> i'll check too, but there isn't anything critical i think
14:16:34 <gmann> kopecmartin: yeah but that can go later too. but anyways I am reviwing that
14:17:01 <kopecmartin> me too, i'll bring it up in a minute
14:17:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
14:17:09 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
14:17:14 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
14:17:21 <kopecmartin> all green \o/
14:17:48 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
14:17:53 <kopecmartin> any updates, highlights we need to discuss today ?
14:18:03 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
14:18:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:18:09 <kopecmartin> there are none
14:18:20 <kopecmartin> I wanted to bring up this
14:18:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/804107
14:18:48 <kopecmartin> i pinged also afazekas about it because i can't decide if i'm for or against ..
14:19:03 <kopecmartin> my main question is, is it safe to expand a functionality of that scenario test
14:19:03 <kopecmartin> ?
14:19:09 <afazekas> kopecmartin, Answered on the review. BTW you can ping me on this channel ;-)
14:19:23 <kopecmartin> afazekas: thanks
14:19:28 <kopecmartin> good to know, thank you :)
14:19:59 * kopecmartin reading the comment
14:20:18 <kopecmartin> cool, looks ok then
14:20:39 <kopecmartin> i wasn't sure if we can expect snapshot support on every environment the scenario test might be executed on
14:20:48 <kopecmartin> that was my main concern
14:21:15 <kopecmartin> as was also raised by sean-k-mooney
14:21:23 <kopecmartin> in the comments
14:22:11 <gmann> kopecmartin: as you brought the config option for snapshot, I think it make sense to do it in separate test
14:22:14 <gmann> commented in review
14:22:21 <kopecmartin> although i agree that creating a new test just for that is quite an overkill , it would be a duplication of that minimal test
14:22:23 <afazekas> kopecmartin, AFAIK the nova backand support is shrieked, not all backend supported it in the past .
14:22:52 <gmann> kopecmartin: it does not need to be exact duplicate
14:23:33 <gmann> we can just do 1. boot server 2. attach volume 3. write volume & snapshot 4. reboot server 5. check timestamp
14:23:46 <gmann> but more or less doing most of part same
14:25:32 <gmann> so I changed my vote now and going with the new test
14:25:58 <kopecmartin> so it would be basically TestMinimumBasicScenario just without security group work and of course plus the new additions (timestamp and snapshot)
14:26:24 <gmann> yeah, I think most of scenario test need most of these steps except reboot
14:26:39 <afazekas> kopecmartin, https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/support-matrix.html "Attach block volume to multiple instances" makes it incompatble with the exotic drivers, the snapshot does not seams to increase the incompatibility
14:27:17 <gmann> afazekas: that test doing volume snapshot via cinder API not server snapshot
14:27:50 <gmann> but we do have config option for that to handle such incompatibility
14:28:20 <afazekas> gmann, yes, BTW,AFAIK the nfs is assisted snapshot, nova does extra loops with cinder
14:28:45 <gmann> ah yes, that is true.
14:29:32 <kopecmartin> thank you for the good comments, i'm glad we sorted that out
14:29:33 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
14:29:43 * afazekas copied wrong action name, the good one "Attach block volume to multiple instances"
14:29:50 <kopecmartin> anything else to discuss?
14:30:30 <kopecmartin> meanwhile
14:30:31 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
14:30:35 <gmann> kopecmartin: on release things
14:30:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena
14:30:47 <kopecmartin> gmann: oh, right
14:31:04 <gmann> we need to check with release timing to start QA part on devstack/grenade etc
14:31:14 <gmann> I can help on this if you need
14:32:00 <kopecmartin> yeah sure, when do we wanna start ?
14:33:12 <gmann> I need to check the release timing on what step they are
14:33:45 <gmann> I can check and push WIP sometime today or tomorrow
14:33:45 <kopecmartin> get it
14:34:08 <gmann> and tempest release we want to do now or want to wait for the scenario test ?
14:34:33 <gmann> I think we are good and can release with current hash
14:34:42 <kopecmartin> let's wait a little, if the patch gets updated soon, we can wait, if not let's move forward without it
14:35:03 <gmann> ok, sure, we have time till 13th I think which is deadline
14:35:21 <kopecmartin> ok
14:35:28 <gmann> but doing in this week will be good
14:35:34 <kopecmartin> agree
14:35:41 <gmann> cool
14:36:07 <kopecmartin> ok then, anything else?
14:36:25 <tosky> back to open discussion...
14:36:29 <tosky> just one question: if you remember, devstack-plugin-ceph is now branched, but only starting from train; an upcoming change is going to break stein for  sure, can we request a branch for stein too (probably starting from the branching point of train)?
14:39:32 <kopecmartin> i think we can, seems like we don't have a choice
14:39:33 <gmann> tosky: sure, we can do if master is not working and EM of stable/stein team can work on that
14:40:17 <tosky> gmann: after this change, it won't work for sure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/807706
14:40:29 <gmann> ok
14:40:30 <tosky> can I simply propose the new branch to the release team, adding you all in cc?
14:40:44 <gmann> +1, works fine
14:41:08 <tosky> ack, thanks!
14:43:51 <gmann> moving to bugs?
14:44:11 <kopecmartin> sure
14:44:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena#L5
14:44:23 <kopecmartin> i have recorded the nubmers as alwyas
14:44:30 <kopecmartin> i don't have anything else to bring up
14:45:35 <gmann> yeah, did not see any critical bugs.
14:45:38 <gmann> I am good too on this
14:46:56 <kopecmartin> ok, so it seems we're at the end
14:47:02 <gmann> yeah
14:47:06 <kopecmartin> let's close the office hour then
14:47:08 <kopecmartin> thank you all
14:47:09 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting