15:00:55 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:55 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Dec  7 15:00:55 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:55 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:55 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:01:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting
15:01:07 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^
15:01:17 <gmann> o/
15:01:18 <lpiwowar> hi o/
15:01:41 <jparoly> o/
15:02:10 <kopecmartin> hi all o/
15:02:12 <kopecmartin> let's start
15:02:18 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:02:35 <kopecmartin> nothing from my side here
15:02:45 <kopecmartin> #topic Yoga Priority Items progress
15:02:51 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-priority
15:02:56 <kopecmartin> any updates on this front?
15:03:41 <gmann> not much from me
15:04:05 <kopecmartin> me neither
15:04:42 <kopecmartin> regarding FIPS , there is the patch for supporting ecdsa keys
15:04:44 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/807465
15:05:02 <kopecmartin> i see it has got updated , i need to revisit that
15:05:43 <kopecmartin> seems like most of gmann's comments were addressed, I'll revisit it after the meeting
15:06:56 <kopecmartin> moving o
15:06:57 <kopecmartin> on
15:06:59 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:07:03 <kopecmartin> nothing here yet
15:07:07 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:07:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
15:07:28 <kopecmartin> no changes with priority == +2
15:07:36 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:07:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-xena-py3&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:07:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:09:21 <kopecmartin> i see 2 failures in ussuri and victoria jobs , however, seem random
15:09:43 <kopecmartin> 2 timeouts
15:10:08 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:10:13 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:10:18 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
15:10:27 <kopecmartin> no changes
15:10:31 <kopecmartin> anything to bring up?
15:11:16 <lpiwowar> Nothing on my part
15:12:40 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:12:53 <kopecmartin> (gmann) Turning off the openstack-health service and so does retirement of it?
15:13:12 <kopecmartin> (kopecmartin) I agree with retiring, we don't have resources to fix and maintain that , TripleO CI team is working on TripleO Health which should provide similar functionality
15:13:51 <kopecmartin> so, we need to retire openstack-health as we know it, because it's been out of date for more than 6 months already and we don't have resources to fix it
15:14:09 <gmann> we got reply now to have discussion on collaboration
15:14:16 <gmann> from TripleO CI team,
15:14:17 <kopecmartin> tripleo ci team is working on their health app (to me it provides very similar functionality as openstack-health) for their jobs
15:14:21 <kopecmartin> gmann: yes
15:14:56 <gmann> and that is branched from openstack-health repo
15:15:12 <gmann> so it means they are user of it?
15:15:19 <kopecmartin> and I think we can come up with a solution which will allow our jobs publish data to that application
15:15:25 <kopecmartin> gmann: that's a good question
15:15:31 <gmann> yeah
15:15:31 <kopecmartin> i'm not absolutely sure
15:15:40 <kopecmartin> we could discuss that during the call
15:15:50 <gmann> anyways we need to discuss on that with them and get more clarity
15:15:53 <gmann> yeah
15:16:22 <kopecmartin> also I don't understand whether they will reuse openstack-health UI
15:16:24 <gmann> may be you can invite them in next meeting. I will reply to email also to have discussion in next meeting
15:16:49 <kopecmartin> i can, sure
15:16:50 <gmann> if it is branched or forked then they are using it. that is my understanding currently
15:17:09 <kopecmartin> i think we should have a call, if it fits everyone's schedule of course
15:17:44 <gmann> you mean separate call or in QA meeting?
15:18:06 <kopecmartin> yes
15:18:26 <kopecmartin> i think it would be more efficient to talk rather than write
15:18:37 <kopecmartin> but let's see, if can find a time slot
15:18:39 <gmann> sure.
15:19:31 <kopecmartin> i like that we may have revive openstack-health (to a certain point) because it turned out it was very good for checking a test stability
15:20:10 <kopecmartin> right now, if we have a test marked as unstable (if it fails it won't fail the whole job) we don't have a way to see it's passing rate
15:20:15 <kopecmartin> *its
15:20:58 <gmann> yeah, that is true. we are in position of retiring it due to maintainers and infra hosting not due to it is not useful
15:21:20 <kopecmartin> exactly
15:21:26 <kopecmartin> good
15:21:34 <kopecmartin> anything else for Open Discussion?
15:21:52 <gmann> anyways let's get more clarity in call with TripleO team and see
15:24:10 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:24:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-yoga
15:24:21 <kopecmartin> bug numbers are recorded at ^
15:24:39 <kopecmartin> I don't have a specific bug to bring up this week
15:25:25 <kopecmartin> so if there isn't anything else , let's wrap it up
15:26:05 <kopecmartin> oh, maybe this
15:26:07 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/733066
15:26:14 <kopecmartin> it's related to
15:26:14 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1881863
15:26:53 <gmann> ah, this is open in my tab but I did get chancw
15:26:53 <kopecmartin> i see there was a good discussion about the proposed solution
15:27:02 <gmann> I will try to do it by this week
15:27:37 <kopecmartin> gmann: thank you
15:27:50 <gmann> I think main things was to know reason why we did not do that in resource setup in first place.
15:28:19 <gmann> I will try to check/recall the history of it I think that was Tokyo summit :)
15:28:31 <gmann> do not even remember when it was
15:28:49 <gmann> but I will check and reply/fix something this week for sure
15:29:33 <kopecmartin> uff
15:29:41 <kopecmartin> good, thank you
15:29:53 <kopecmartin> ok, that's it then
15:30:09 <kopecmartin> thank you all, see you around
15:30:12 <gmann> nothing else from me too
15:30:15 <gmann> thanks kopecmartin
15:30:30 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting