15:01:46 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:01:46 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Dec 14 15:01:46 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:46 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:46 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:01:53 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting
15:01:58 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^
15:02:29 <frickler> o/
15:03:46 <kopecmartin> hey o/
15:03:59 <lpiwowar> hi o/
15:04:02 <kopecmartin> let's start by going through the usual
15:04:26 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:04:39 <kopecmartin> nothing specific from me here
15:04:42 <gmann> o/
15:04:44 <kopecmartin> #topic Yoga Priority Items progress
15:04:51 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-priority
15:05:02 <kopecmartin> any updates on the priority items?
15:05:03 <soniya29> hello
15:05:21 <kopecmartin> hey lpiwowar, gmann, soniya29 o/
15:06:35 <jparoly> o/
15:06:49 <kopecmartin> no updates from my side w.r.t priority items
15:06:59 <soniya29> same with me
15:07:09 <kopecmartin> we just should proceed with the fips patches, but let's talk about that in a minute
15:08:00 <kopecmartin> gmann: anything for "Migration of Devstack and Tempest tests to new secure RBAC"? anything i can help with?
15:08:18 <gmann> kopecmartin: not yet, few things under work but not up as such
15:08:38 <kopecmartin> ok, thanks
15:09:06 <kopecmartin> soniya29: what about "Cleanup of duplicated scenario.manager"? any blockers i could help with?
15:10:17 <soniya29> kopecmartin, i haven't started with it yet :)
15:10:43 <kopecmartin> soniya29: np, just let me know if i can help you in any way :)
15:10:51 <soniya29> kopecmartin, yeah, sure
15:11:01 <kopecmartin> sure, moving on
15:11:01 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:11:07 <kopecmartin> nothing here, let's skip
15:11:11 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:11:16 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
15:11:20 <kopecmartin> no changes with priority == +2
15:12:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:12:11 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-xena-py3&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:12:18 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:12:26 <kopecmartin> all green \o/
15:12:35 <kopecmartin> any gate issues to bring up?
15:13:02 <gmann> nothing I have seen
15:13:20 <frickler> the was a pypi hickup earlier today
15:13:28 <frickler> should be fixed by now
15:13:48 <kopecmartin> oh, perfect
15:14:18 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:14:22 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:14:26 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
15:14:39 <kopecmartin> no changes there
15:14:45 <kopecmartin> any change to bring up?
15:15:36 <kopecmartin> i have this one regarding ecdsa keys
15:15:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/807465
15:16:28 <kopecmartin> from what i remember it doesn't change anything, just adds support for different keys, I need to take a look again
15:16:46 <kopecmartin> but there shouldn't be any harm to proceed, we need to start somewhere with the fips thingy
15:16:52 <gmann> I will also check that, I think we have job setup in nova to run with that key and see if that is working?
15:17:11 <kopecmartin> yeah, i think it was
15:17:14 <gmann> do you have that nova job patch?
15:17:20 <kopecmartin> let me check
15:17:40 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519/15/.zuul.yaml#521
15:17:46 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519
15:18:10 <gmann> but that does not depends-on on tempest
15:18:37 <gmann> ah it is
15:19:01 <gmann> we need that nova job to pass first so that we can verify the tempest change
15:19:03 <kopecmartin> it does, on a third review after the one with the ecdsa keys support
15:19:10 <gmann> yeah
15:19:25 <kopecmartin> ok, recheck then? or you mean to have that job gating in tempest?
15:20:29 <kopecmartin> at some point i'd like to see those jobs (at least one with fips) gating in tempest, but i'm kinda lost with all the prerequisites, like which patch needs to be merged before we can have that
15:20:31 <gmann> yeah, adding in tempest will be good also to verify the change
15:20:37 <kopecmartin> i need to take a deeper look
15:21:31 <gmann> added comment in that patch to add tempest job
15:21:54 <gmann> without that it is difficult to check if new changes/testrs are working on service side or not
15:22:58 <kopecmartin> yeah, agree, i'll try to propose that after the meeting as a non-voting of course and then we can recheck the patch with the ecdsa keys support
15:23:14 <gmann> +1, thanks
15:23:30 <gmann> we can do in same patch so that we sync on merging the stack
15:24:15 <kopecmartin> yeah, good, let's move on
15:24:17 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:24:28 <kopecmartin> (gmann) Turning off the openstack-health service and so does retirement of it?
15:25:06 <kopecmartin> there will be a call tomorrow with the tripleo ci team where we will discuss next steps on how we can collaborate together as they are building their version of openstakc-health
15:25:29 <kopecmartin> the day after tomorrow, not tomorrow, sorry
15:25:35 <gmann> kopecmartin: thanks for the call schedule.
15:25:38 <kopecmartin> let me find the emails
15:25:39 <gmann> did we send on ML
15:25:52 <kopecmartin> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-December/026250.html
15:26:06 <gmann> yeah Thursday December 16th 1630 UTC
15:26:08 <gmann> +1
15:26:15 <kopecmartin> so in 2 days and one hour
15:26:54 <kopecmartin> the next topic is
15:26:56 <kopecmartin> (gmann) This came up during pain point discussion in TC. With fewer contributors issues in QA (especially devstack where we have more incoming requests/changes), how about expanding the devstack team with potential candidates?
15:27:02 <kopecmartin> #link      https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination
15:27:15 <gmann> yeah, it is just a thought in case we can extend
15:27:24 <gmann> frickler: yoctozepto ianw ^^ what you think
15:27:27 <frickler> are there any candidates? also it might make sense to clean up inactive cores
15:27:34 <gmann> and before that we need to find the candidates
15:27:44 <gmann> frickler: yeah that is good point
15:28:24 <gmann> I think we can discuss on the possible candidates like we do for adding core process among us first to avoid any offending
15:28:38 <frickler> I would be very glad to mentor potential candidates, but I haven't seen any
15:28:43 <gmann> and then see if we can solve the issue brought up in pain point discussion
15:29:14 <gmann> frickler: yeah. there were few in my thought and before i discuss about those they prioirty change
15:30:05 <gmann> anyways, I just added the topic as it came up in pain point discussion but we can follow our normal process of finding the candidates first and then proceed
15:30:19 <frickler> in particular there still isn't anyone with a focus on centos/fedora, would be good if someone within redhat could bring that up internally
15:30:30 <gmann> I will start few on email
15:30:57 <kopecmartin> eliadcohen: ^
15:31:04 <gmann> +1, yeah good point, we have seen lot of interest from centos side on testing, py3.6 etc I think it make sense to bring this to them
15:31:20 <gmann> and if they can help to maintain devstack part of that, it will be helpful
15:31:48 <kopecmartin> do we wanna write an email to ML? and let's see who'll reply
15:31:50 <frickler> e.g. we need to urgently move to fedora35 I think
15:31:58 <frickler> before f34 gets removed from infra
15:32:11 <gmann> kopecmartin: for redhat, yes please. or you can send on rdo community ML also
15:32:28 <gmann> kopecmartin: frickler for current possible candidate, let me start email among us first
15:32:55 <kopecmartin> gmann: ack
15:33:18 <frickler> gmann: make sure to use my current email then
15:33:36 <gmann> frickler: ack
15:34:38 <kopecmartin> anything else for the open discussion?
15:34:46 <gmann> that's all from me
15:36:09 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:36:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-yoga
15:36:22 <kopecmartin> bug numbers are recorded at ^
15:37:06 <kopecmartin> however, i don't have any specific bug to bring up
15:37:23 <kopecmartin> so if there isn't anything else to discuss, i think that's it then
15:38:19 <kopecmartin> thank you all
15:38:20 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting