15:00:34 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:34 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Apr 26 15:00:34 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:34 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:34 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting
15:00:46 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^
15:02:18 <gmann> kopecmartin: sorry in RBAC discussion
15:02:35 <kopecmartin> np, i'll just go through the usual
15:03:12 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:03:21 <kopecmartin> nothing for now
15:03:23 <kopecmartin> #topic Zed Priority Items progress
15:03:30 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority
15:04:30 <kopecmartin> not many updates from my side
15:04:41 <kopecmartin> i've pushed up a review to switch to ecdsa in tempest by default
15:04:49 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/838753
15:05:18 <kopecmartin> i will work on other priority items this week
15:05:29 <kopecmartin> f.e. Unstable tests in Tempest monitoring
15:05:44 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:05:45 <kopecmartin> nothing for now
15:05:51 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:06:00 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:06:09 <kopecmartin> nothing
15:06:22 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:06:27 <kopecmartin> stable:
15:06:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:06:41 <kopecmartin> master:
15:06:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:07:11 <kopecmartin> all green \o/
15:07:23 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:07:32 <kopecmartin> centos 8/9 stream
15:07:36 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=tempest-full-py3-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:07:47 <kopecmartin> it will be soon just centos 9 as we're dropping 8
15:07:52 <frickler> nova dumped py36
15:08:39 <frickler> not sure what openeuler uses
15:09:17 <kopecmartin> uf, thanks for bringing that up, that will cause some issues somewhere
15:09:26 <kopecmartin> fedora:
15:09:27 <kopecmartin> #link  #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:09:39 <kopecmartin> epenEuler
15:09:40 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-20.03-SP2+&skip=0
15:09:47 <kopecmartin> and debian
15:09:48 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:10:08 <kopecmartin> there are some ups and downs :/
15:10:39 <frickler> next week we also should have jammy running. or maybe already tomorrow
15:11:13 <kopecmartin> feel free anyone to take a look at the jobs and check what we can fix to have them more stable, I've been trying to get to that myself for some time
15:11:25 <kopecmartin> nice, i saw a review somewhere, right?
15:11:44 <frickler> yes, but it still needs some infra work first
15:12:02 <frickler> also discovered some unrelated zuul issue
15:12:47 <kopecmartin> something related to the git "fix"? I've been fixing that fix the whole week in various projects :D
15:12:56 <slaweq> gmann yoctozepto8 and other devstack cores, can You review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839217 as this is blocking many jobs e.g. in networking-odl or ovn-octavia-provider repos
15:13:00 <slaweq> thx in advance
15:14:41 <kopecmartin> slaweq: sure, will have a look
15:14:55 <frickler> kopecmartin: the zuul thing is completely unrelated probably. it is the "unknown config error" on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839359 which should really only be a node_failure
15:14:55 <slaweq> thx a lot kopecmartin
15:15:40 <kopecmartin> ou
15:16:14 <kopecmartin> yeah, that's unrelated for sure
15:17:28 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:17:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:17:58 <kopecmartin> I see 2 reviews there in devstack
15:18:02 <kopecmartin> please review
15:18:11 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:18:18 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:19:29 <sean-k-mooney> am i have one topic if there are no others
15:20:20 <kopecmartin> sean-k-mooney: go ahead
15:21:06 <sean-k-mooney> i was helping someone deploy ceph on centos 9 stream earlier today and notice the devstack-plugin-ceph does not actlly support it and also the ceph repos at ceph.com dont package for cs9
15:21:18 <sean-k-mooney> i know there are some efforts to adopt cephadm
15:21:45 <sean-k-mooney> so i have two questiosn 1 any objetions if i look at add support for using the disto package in the exsitng plugin for cs9
15:22:04 <sean-k-mooney> and 2 will the cephadm work be supported on cs9?
15:23:08 <sean-k-mooney> Uggla who is not here is working on virtio-fs supprot in nova for manila shares. we coudl test this with cinder lvm and nfs but it woudl be nice to be able to also test cephfs upstream
15:23:29 <sean-k-mooney> however we cannot uses ubuntu 20.04 as the libvirt and qemu are not new enought to test with virtio-fs
15:24:30 <sean-k-mooney> so they are not currently blocked as they can test with nfs but it would be good if we could have a plan to enabel testing with cephfs too before ubuntu 22.04 is avaiable in ci
15:24:52 <kopecmartin> unfortunately i'm no expert on ceph , anyone here from ceph or devstack-plugin-ceph?
15:24:57 <kopecmartin> tosky: maybe? ^
15:25:54 <sean-k-mooney> the packages are availbel in the stroge sig repos https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/storage/x86_64/
15:26:29 <sean-k-mooney> but i dont know if adding support for usign those repos would be accpeted in the plugin or conflict with the cephadm work
15:26:59 <frickler> 22.04 should be available in a day or two, but I don't know how much work it will be to adapt the ceph plugin
15:27:47 <sean-k-mooney> i was hoping it would just be an if here https://github.com/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/blob/master/devstack/lib/ceph#L913-L943=
15:27:59 <frickler> I likely would prioritize the cephadm work and try to build cs9 on top of that. but then I'm not actually doing anything about that, so not too authoritative, either
15:28:00 <sean-k-mooney> i.e. if c9s use disto packages
15:28:51 <tosky> sean-k-mooney: I guess the cephadm work would need to be finished first - the expert here is Francesco
15:29:27 <tosky> aka fmount ^^
15:29:44 <sean-k-mooney> ya so i think these can be done in parallel if we were ok with extendign the legacy approch in the interim
15:29:54 <tosky> I think at this point it would be better to go cephadm
15:29:59 <sean-k-mooney> we dont need to solve this now by the way
15:30:02 <tosky> in fact the last reviews shows that cephadm seem to be working
15:30:10 <sean-k-mooney> tosky: does cephadm supprot centos 9 stream
15:30:32 <sean-k-mooney> if so then ya i coudl perhaps test the inflight patches
15:30:36 <tosky> sean-k-mooney: I'm not sure it was tested, but iirc it use containers, so it should probably be be easier to manager
15:31:20 <sean-k-mooney> ok ill see if i can find time to test the cephadm work in the next week or two
15:31:55 <sean-k-mooney> and then i can report back if that does not work. i didnt really want to spend too much time on the old way if we could get the new way working
15:32:01 <dansmith> gmann: that "tolerate" patch is going to fail on a volume thing and cs9 :/
15:32:43 <gmann> kopecmartin: I have one topic, not sure if ceph one is done or need to wait?
15:32:49 <gmann> dansmith: humm
15:32:51 <sean-k-mooney> gmann: go for it
15:32:55 <gmann> ok
15:32:55 <sean-k-mooney> i got what i needed
15:32:56 <gmann> frickler: kopecmartin :  you might have seen c8s dropping patches. if you agree on this direction, I can send it on ML asking other projects also to move to c9s and devstack will drop the support for c8s- https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:drop-c8s-testing
15:33:56 <kopecmartin> i agree in general, i'm just not sure if we can delete devstack-single-node-centos-8-stream nodeset yet
15:34:38 <frickler> gmann: I was wondering whether we should drop support in stack.sh at the same time. if it's not tested anymore, it's going to be broken soon anyway
15:35:18 <gmann> frickler: I was hesitant to do until all jobs on project side and 3rd party CI are done.
15:35:33 <gmann> may be during m-2 we can do that? we can set that deadline in ML
15:36:58 <frickler> in my experience we need to break things in order to make people notice, so I would do this as early as possible
15:37:59 <frickler> if someone still needs it, they could still FORCE it
15:38:24 <gmann> ok, let me first send on ML and let'
15:38:47 <gmann> let's wait for a week or so and then we can put it in stack.sh
15:38:56 <kopecmartin> sounds like a plan
15:39:30 <kopecmartin> good, anything else?
15:39:57 <gmann> this one blocking things, need one more review on this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839217
15:40:15 <gmann> slaweq pinged this before just to bump this as it is blocking gate
15:41:17 <dansmith> gmann: also this, because systemd is reporting a non-integer memory count for some services sometime: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839387
15:41:27 <dansmith> not sure when or how that could happen, but it does.
15:41:40 <dansmith> sorry, I thought i had added you on that
15:42:00 <gmann> dansmith: +W.
15:42:06 <dansmith> thanks
15:42:26 <gmann> kopecmartin:  that is all from me.
15:43:11 <opendevreview> Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: Add Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (jammy) platform job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839359
15:43:18 <kopecmartin> gmann: this is ready too - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/814438
15:43:33 <gmann> kopecmartin: sure, will check it.
15:44:01 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side too
15:44:14 <kopecmartin> that's it ,thank you everyone for joining
15:44:16 <kopecmartin> see you around
15:44:22 <gmann> kopecmartin: +W
15:44:25 <gmann> thanks
15:44:29 <kopecmartin> thanks
15:44:34 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting