15:00:50 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:50 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue May 10 15:00:50 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:50 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:50 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:01:07 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting
15:01:09 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^
15:01:32 <gmann> o/
15:01:41 <kopecmartin> \o
15:02:56 <kopecmartin> let's go through usual
15:03:05 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:03:05 <frickler> o/
15:03:10 <kopecmartin> hi o/
15:03:45 <kopecmartin> i don't have any announcements
15:03:48 <kopecmartin> #topic Zed Priority Items progress
15:03:53 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority
15:04:58 <kopecmartin> i have a few AIs there, still in progress
15:07:03 <kopecmartin> i don't see any other updates in the document
15:07:10 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:07:15 <kopecmartin> nothing for now
15:07:21 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:07:57 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:08:06 <kopecmartin> nothing marked with priority +2
15:08:12 <kopecmartin> any urgent review we should be aware of/review?
15:08:36 <gmann> nothing I am aware of
15:09:05 <kopecmartin> ack
15:09:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:09:13 <kopecmartin> stable
15:09:14 <kopecmartin> #link #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:09:21 <kopecmartin> master
15:09:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:09:28 <kopecmartin> seems all is green \o/
15:10:04 <frickler> almost suspiciously green ;)
15:10:44 <kopecmartin> yeah
15:10:51 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:11:00 <kopecmartin> centos9-stream
15:11:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=tempest-full-py3-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:11:34 <kopecmartin> not baad, we've seen worse
15:11:56 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:11:57 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:12:27 <kopecmartin> more passes than failures
15:12:46 <frickler> yatin's fix for jammy might help there, too
15:13:07 <kopecmartin> nice
15:13:16 <kopecmartin> this one?
15:13:18 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/840885
15:14:12 <frickler> yes. waiting for feedback on lajoskatona's question there, but otherwise gtg
15:15:11 <kopecmartin> yup, a feedback from neutron team would help
15:15:19 <kopecmartin> openEuler
15:15:20 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-20.03-SP2+&skip=0
15:15:44 <kopecmartin> similar to centos9-stream , not bad, could be better
15:15:59 <kopecmartin> debian
15:16:01 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:16:13 <kopecmartin> this one looks really good
15:16:52 <kopecmartin> oh, openeuler isn't executed very often
15:17:09 <frickler> yes, we moved to experimental
15:17:35 <frickler> maybe I should run that on the jammy patches just to get some coverage
15:17:35 <kopecmartin> oh, yeah, i forgot
15:17:44 <gmann> yeah
15:18:00 <kopecmartin> +1
15:18:26 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:18:31 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:18:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:18:57 <frickler> that just the patch already mentioned
15:19:07 <frickler> +'s
15:19:36 <kopecmartin> yup
15:19:38 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:19:42 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:20:00 <frickler> I tried to finalise the jammy patch
15:20:24 <frickler> it is currently failing on the multinode jobs, but please have a look in terms of the selection of jobs to run
15:20:33 <frickler> https://review.opendev.org/839359
15:20:53 <frickler> that would be ovn (default), ovn-source and ovs
15:21:21 <frickler> if you think that that is too much, we can reduce. but we'll need all of those in AA when we switch from focal
15:21:57 <frickler> so I thought better give it some good coverage upfront
15:22:40 <frickler> clarkb: ianw: fungi: ^^ maybe also have a look from your infra resource guardian pov
15:23:45 <clarkb> its probably fine as next release you'll drop focal and do jammy only aiui
15:23:52 <clarkb> so its a short period of time with extra jobs
15:24:17 <frickler> that would be the intention, yes, let's hope the TC agrees
15:25:25 <kopecmartin> i see some py3.10 issues and in general, i've seen many issues with that version of python in other QA projects, so it might be good idea to start testing rather sooner than later
15:25:27 <frickler> does anyone know the status of horizon and py310? I didn't check that yet
15:26:14 <frickler> and yes, apparently there also is some issue with eventlet, but it doesn't seem to get triggered in our testing so far
15:26:18 <gmann> frickler: clarkb yes that is plan to move to jammy in AA but as you said we need to fix those multinode things also
15:26:47 <frickler> gmann: the multinode issue is from the extra log collection that yatin added, not related to jammy
15:27:04 <frickler> I was lazy and just merged it together, might need to split
15:27:32 <gmann> ohk
15:28:20 <frickler> these are because the secondary node doesn't run ovn db
15:29:17 <gmann> frickler: so in this 839359 you are targeting single node job right?
15:29:59 <frickler> gmann: well I was hoping it would work for everything, but turns out it doesn't
15:30:15 <frickler> so I'll split out the added log collection and then it should be fine
15:30:31 <frickler> just waiting for jobs to finish so that we have all the results recorded
15:31:21 <gmann> ok
15:31:44 <frickler> actually ... maybe a good idea to add a jammy multinode job, too, so we have that also covered
15:32:04 <gmann> +1
15:32:04 <frickler> will do that in a followup
15:32:10 <gmann> thanks
15:32:46 <kopecmartin> btw, i proposed several patches to move to Zed testing runtime in QA projects
15:32:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:switch-to-zed-testing-runtime
15:32:48 <frickler> lajoskatona mentioned that they will also run some additional jobs on the neutron side
15:32:56 <gmann> yeah
15:33:02 <kopecmartin> seems like stackviz is totally out of date - its dependencies i mean
15:33:35 <gmann> kopecmartin: +1 on adding py3.10 jobs
15:33:58 <lajoskatona> frickler, gmann, kopecmartin: this is for new ubuntu, because I planned that for Neutron stadium and linuxbrdge
15:34:14 <frickler> lajoskatona: yes
15:34:14 <kopecmartin> gmann: i don't remember if i added them everywhere, need to check
15:34:49 <gmann> kopecmartin: for stackviz I think we still support 3.5 there and so does rocky
15:35:04 <gmann> I will review your patches
15:35:24 <kopecmartin> gmann: thanks
15:35:35 <kopecmartin> we will also need a nodejs-16 job
15:35:36 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/824461
15:35:44 <kopecmartin> clarkb: gmann can you have a look please ^
15:37:25 <gmann> kopecmartin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/831912/2/zuul.d/project-templates.yaml
15:37:33 <gmann> clarkb: need 2nd review on this ^^
15:37:33 <frickler> kopecmartin: where do you need that job? did you already run it anywhere?
15:38:26 <kopecmartin> frickler: in some of the projects here https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:switch-to-zed-testing-runtime
15:38:49 <kopecmartin> gmann: i didn't know there is another one, i'll update my patches on top of that one
15:38:57 <gmann> kopecmartin: +1 thanks
15:39:03 <frickler> kopecmartin: those are identical patches afaict
15:39:14 <frickler> that's also why there is no conflict shown in gerrit
15:40:20 <kopecmartin> heh
15:40:26 <kopecmartin> good, anything else for the open discussion?
15:41:16 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:41:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-zed
15:41:51 <kopecmartin> numbers were recorded
15:41:55 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side
15:43:11 <kopecmartin> thank you all
15:43:14 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting