15:00:18 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:18 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jun 28 15:00:18 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:18 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:18 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting
15:00:33 <kopecmartin> the agenda for today ^^
15:00:56 <lpiwowar> hi o/
15:01:41 <kopecmartin> o/
15:04:02 <soniya29> hello
15:04:17 <kopecmartin> hi
15:04:30 <kopecmartin> let's start
15:04:37 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:04:53 <kopecmartin> I'd like to cut an intermediate release for Tempest
15:05:03 <kopecmartin> to include latest bug fixes related to the sshable issues
15:05:19 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/847849
15:05:39 <kopecmartin> I'm waiting for one other patch to get merged first,then we'll proceed with the release ^^
15:06:09 <kopecmartin> #topic Zed Priority Items progress
15:06:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority
15:06:18 <kopecmartin> any updates on this front?
15:06:30 <soniya29> kopecmartin, nope
15:06:55 <kopecmartin> I started experimenting with enforce scope in tempest
15:06:56 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/847760
15:07:40 <kopecmartin> we have a few failures there, we probably need to tweak the roles used in tempest.conf
15:07:42 <kopecmartin> still in progress
15:08:45 <kopecmartin> moving on
15:08:46 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:08:52 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:09:11 <kopecmartin> one review there, already +w
15:09:32 <kopecmartin> any other urgent patches to review?
15:09:55 <lpiwowar> Nothing from my side kopecmartin
15:10:16 <kopecmartin> ack
15:10:25 <kopecmartin> Bare Recheck tracking:
15:10:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:10:45 <kopecmartin> seems like QA is doing 68.42 % of recheck as bare recheck which is not good.
15:11:11 <gmann> yeah, this is from TC side we discuss per project bare recheck
15:11:14 <kopecmartin> so please, be careful and avoid bare rechecks - 'recheck' .. including me
15:11:20 <kopecmartin> i know i made a few :D
15:11:29 <gmann> bare recheck means we should not juts to recheck without checking and debugging the failure
15:11:50 <gmann> there is another document explaining about how to do debug and  recheck
15:12:02 <gmann> I added it in meeting wiki page also
15:12:06 <kopecmartin> #info STOP DOING BARE RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
15:12:43 <kopecmartin> very helpful
15:13:04 <kopecmartin> i recommend going through that resource
15:13:39 <kopecmartin> gmann: thanks for the reminder
15:13:49 <gmann> +1 and let's keep this item for very week meeting for reminder and monitoring
15:14:02 <kopecmartin> sure
15:14:51 <soniya29> gmann, kopecmartin, can i help here?
15:15:10 <soniya29> if any, let me know
15:15:10 <kopecmartin> you mean on the recheck front?
15:15:29 <soniya29> yeah
15:15:53 <kopecmartin> sure, just anytime before typing 'recheck' you and everyone should try debug first and decide whether it's worth rechecking or whether we know why we're rechecking
15:16:10 <soniya29> yeah, sure
15:16:53 <kopecmartin> i must admit it's a nice habbit as it also helps keep track of the current issues/failures across CI
15:17:31 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:17:39 <kopecmartin> stable
15:17:39 <kopecmartin> #link #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:17:47 <kopecmartin> master
15:17:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:19:28 <kopecmartin> seems all good there
15:19:54 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:20:02 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:20:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=tempest-full-py3-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:20:08 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:20:08 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:20:15 <kopecmartin> debian
15:20:16 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:20:24 <kopecmartin> jammy
15:20:24 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0
15:22:59 <kopecmartin> cs-9 constantly failing
15:23:02 <kopecmartin> still due to
15:23:05 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1979047
15:23:41 <kopecmartin> the other distros seem to be passing, that's great
15:23:45 <frickler> sad they don't seem to have any urgency in fixing this
15:24:14 <kopecmartin> gmann: do we want debian or / and fedora be voting - check / periodic / other pipeline?
15:25:00 <kopecmartin> frickler: yeah, i haven't checked what exactly is wrong and whether it's moving anywhere, but it's true it's been failing for some time now
15:25:00 <gmann> I think debian should be voting
15:25:08 <gmann> and fedora in periodic is ok
15:25:17 <frickler> +1 for debian
15:25:45 <frickler> seems pretty stable with the switch to ovn
15:26:24 <kopecmartin> agree
15:26:31 <kopecmartin> AI make debian job voting
15:26:50 <kopecmartin> another one
15:27:03 <kopecmartin> AI find time and create rocky job
15:27:40 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:27:44 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:27:50 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:28:14 <kopecmartin> no changes there
15:28:18 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/847330
15:28:23 <kopecmartin> gmann: is this ok now? ^^
15:28:40 <kopecmartin> if yes, then after it's in the gate we can start with the release
15:28:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/847849
15:29:11 <gmann> kopecmartin: sure, will check after meeting
15:29:25 <kopecmartin> thanks
15:29:40 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:29:44 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:30:36 <kopecmartin> i have one enforce scope related
15:30:55 <kopecmartin> i deployed an env with devstack using ENFORCE_SCOPE var
15:31:11 <kopecmartin> however, i'm failing to execute f.e. 'openstack endpoint list' command
15:31:19 <kopecmartin> i'm getting unauthorized error
15:31:44 <kopecmartin> i tried both users devstack provides in the openrc and still the same error
15:31:55 <kopecmartin> any pointers on how to handle this?
15:32:05 <kopecmartin> i guess i need a different role, but i'm not sure which one
15:32:06 <frickler> I think you may need to use cloud users?
15:32:36 <frickler> OS_CLOUD=devstack-system did you try that?
15:32:54 <kopecmartin> one sec
15:33:15 <frickler> devstack-system-admin really
15:33:24 <frickler> or -reader, -member
15:34:05 <kopecmartin> hm, cloud devstack-system not found
15:34:34 <kopecmartin> i would check what roles my user has, but i can't , i feel locked out :D
15:35:36 <kopecmartin> or i would create a user , i can't , interesting
15:36:30 <frickler> devstack-system-admin is the cloud name
15:37:19 <frickler> but I didn't try with enforce yet
15:37:23 <kopecmartin> yup, still getting 'You are not authorized to perform the requested action: identity:list_endpoints. (HTTP 403) (Request-ID: req-bdc87305-7c3e-4e56-b17b-24737d9feefe)'
15:38:02 <kopecmartin> oh, good, so it's not just me (maybe)
15:38:37 <kopecmartin> seems like we'll (on devstack's side) need to at least modify doc , or generate a new user(s) etc
15:39:49 <kopecmartin> anyway, that's all from my side
15:40:27 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:40:39 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-zed
15:40:46 <frickler> I cleaned up a bit of the devstack backlog
15:40:48 <kopecmartin> the numbers were recorded as always
15:40:58 <kopecmartin> frickler: i've noticed, thank you!
15:41:10 <kopecmartin> you lowered the numbers quite a lot
15:41:33 <frickler> revisited some bugs I triaged years ago
15:42:10 <kopecmartin> perfect
15:43:31 <kopecmartin> if there is nothing else , i think we're at the end of the today's office hour
15:43:55 <kopecmartin> thank you everyone
15:43:56 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting