15:00:10 #startmeeting qa 15:00:10 Meeting started Tue Jul 12 15:00:10 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:10 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 15:00:19 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting 15:00:22 agenda ^^ 15:00:29 o/ 15:00:37 o/ 15:01:09 o( 15:01:25 or something similar :D 15:01:30 :D 15:01:31 o/ 15:01:33 🖕 15:01:35 :D 15:01:38 Sorry:D 15:01:49 That was mistake 15:01:51 :D wut? :D 15:02:09 and my client even translated that to an image 15:02:10 lol 15:02:12 When you write ":DD" in the lounce it is shortcut for the emoji 15:02:17 the lounge 15:02:27 Yep ... Sorry :D 15:02:46 nice, we opened the meeting with a joke ;) 15:02:50 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 15:03:20 we made an intermediate release of tempest 15:03:31 I will be mostly offline for the next 2.5 weeks (pto but staying home, so some chance I get bored ;-) 15:03:54 frickler: ack, enjoy your vacation 15:04:31 not sure it will be possible to enjoy the heat, but I'll do my best ;) 15:04:54 oh, yeah :/ 15:04:55 good luck 15:05:07 @frickler enjoy!:) 15:05:32 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 15:05:44 we have approx a month for the PTG team signup 15:05:59 the deadline is August 12th 15:06:07 do we need to sign up if we only do virtual session(s) 15:06:20 or do you really intend to do some in-person event? 15:06:22 i didn't see an option to choose between personal or virtual 15:07:05 yes, because the foundation doesn't care about it's members 15:07:07 I would prefer not to go in person this time and IIRC most of us didn't want to go in person too 15:07:19 there is no virtual option in signup 15:07:50 so we'll have to organize a virtual session on our own, is my current understanding 15:07:51 so if we do not want to have physical PTG then just do not sign up. updating it in ML also good notice 15:08:16 frickler: as per current setup of PTG, yes. and we can organize that which should not be hard 15:08:31 ack, i'll send an email 15:08:49 well the difficult part will be avoiding conflicts with other teams. at least kolla is likely to do the same thing 15:08:55 just to make sure, is here anyone who would like to/is going to travel and attend PTG in person? 15:09:07 but do we want to setup at the same time physical PTG are? 15:09:31 likely not at the same time, but neither kolla 15:09:43 kopecmartin: I might travel as I am in North America only but depends on the situation that time as COVID cases are increasing 15:09:44 to allow people to join that also go to ohio 15:10:03 yeah, we can setup some non conflicting time 15:10:20 i'm for non conflicting time too 15:10:52 kopecmartin +1 15:10:56 kind of mid cycle meetup we used to have. but virtually this time 15:11:23 per project mid cycle meetup 15:11:41 I think cinder team does that? 15:14:21 anyways I think doing virtually in some non conflicting is good idea 15:14:21 i don't know about others, we can do that for sure, we'll discuss the date later 15:14:26 yeah 15:14:28 yeah 15:14:34 moving on 15:14:35 #topic Zed Priority Items progress 15:14:42 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority 15:14:44 any updates here? 15:15:32 we're working on 'Unstable tests in Tempest monitoring' 15:17:13 i was also experimenting with Rocky linux, but i got stuck on rabbitmq iirc 15:17:31 that's all from my side 15:17:47 #topic Gate Status Checks 15:17:53 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:18:12 no reviews 15:18:23 any urgent reviews? 15:19:04 bare recheck tracking 15:19:04 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary 15:19:12 we've got worse :( 15:19:17 yeah 15:19:20 please don't do bare rechecks 15:20:04 we're at 81% , we were on 64% 15:20:32 well I'm not sure how useful this statistic is. "recheck foo" without any useful comment isn't helpful either 15:20:59 yeah, recommendation is try to check the failure at least and build that practice 15:21:12 but the percentage might got higher also because we didn't do enough not bare rechecks in the last week -> so the few bare recheck stand out a bit 15:22:09 the ratio per merged change might be more interesting indeed 15:23:47 might be .. there is a table of reviews with most rechecks, that's interesting 15:24:09 #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 15:24:15 stable 15:24:15 #link #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 15:24:23 master 15:24:23 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic 15:24:29 all is good it seems 15:25:10 #topic Distros check 15:25:18 cs-9 15:25:19 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=tempest-full-py3-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 15:25:25 fedora 15:25:25 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0 15:25:32 debian 15:25:33 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0 15:25:39 jammy 15:25:39 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0 15:25:57 cs-9 jobs seem to have a better passing rate than 2 weeks ago 15:26:27 seems that the libvirt bug got fixed 15:27:24 the rest looks quite good too i guess 15:27:37 #topic Sub Teams highlights 15:27:42 Changes with Review-Priority == +1 15:27:47 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:28:33 one change there 15:29:13 i'll check that later today 15:29:14 #topic Open Discussion 15:29:19 anything for the open discussion? 15:29:56 Nothing from my side 15:30:36 there was this discussion about tempest using admin access needlessly yesterday, did you see that? 15:31:05 like https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/tempest/scenario/manager.py#L1362 as example 15:31:36 I once tried something similar with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/678198 , but gave up 15:31:36 yeah, there are many which are not aligned with the default access rule 15:32:25 as RBAC access is changing and reader role will come, we can do some audit that time and fix the things 15:32:37 i did , not sure what to do with that, do we wanna invest some time and start rewriting that to non-admin clients where possible? 15:32:46 yeah 15:32:56 as per the default RBAC policy for that API 15:33:13 gmann: so that would be system-reader then? 15:33:42 frickler: project reader only as of now. 15:34:07 and legacy admin continue the same. to read the things at system level 15:35:51 but using admin unnecessary for non-admin things we should change. 15:36:41 yup, that sounds more than reasonable 15:36:47 ok 15:37:05 i'll try to write it up to the priority document so we can track the progress etc 15:37:07 damiandabrowski: ^^ maybe that answers your question a bit better 15:38:27 ok, moving on 15:38:28 #topic Bug Triage 15:38:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-zed 15:38:48 devstack has no new bugs 15:38:53 \o/ 15:38:54 wau 15:39:18 thanks frickler for the triage 15:39:52 welcome, maybe some day we'll be bug free ... ;) 15:40:05 that would be awesome 15:40:09 +1 15:40:19 then we could focus only to open reviews :D 15:40:42 frickler: thank You! 15:40:57 i see this got updated since the review 15:41:00 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/841719 15:41:11 gmann: does it address your comments? ^^ 15:41:48 today i found this small fix for a test in tempest, i haven't checked in detail yet, although it seems to be a small detail 15:41:49 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/848830 15:42:21 anyway, this is all from my side 15:42:37 if there is nothing else, we can close the office hour 15:42:43 kopecmartin: sure, will check it 15:42:49 nothing from me 15:43:03 thanks everyone 15:43:05 see you around 15:43:05 thx kopecmartin 15:43:10 kopecmartin: thanks 15:43:12 #endmeeting