15:00:42 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:42 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Nov  8 15:00:42 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:42 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:42 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:50 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
15:00:51 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^
15:01:34 <frickler> \o
15:02:12 <gmann> o/
15:02:21 <kopecmartin> o/
15:03:22 <dansmith> o/
15:03:36 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:03:49 <kopecmartin> no announcements from my side
15:04:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Antelope Priority Items progress
15:04:12 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-priority
15:04:35 <kopecmartin> I've started looking into s-rbac
15:04:40 <kopecmartin> (again)
15:04:55 <lpiwowar> o/
15:05:07 <soniya> hello
15:05:35 <kopecmartin> i don't have much updates regarding that yet .. anyway, the priority etherpad should be up to date
15:05:50 <gmann> this is ready for RBAC  #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/861930
15:06:21 <gmann> on job with new RBAC enable, there are few test failing but need to debug them why #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/614484
15:06:28 <gmann> will continue it this week
15:07:12 <kopecmartin> perfect
15:07:17 <kopecmartin> thanks
15:07:25 <kopecmartin> i added to my review list
15:07:30 <kopecmartin> *them
15:07:48 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:08:02 <kopecmartin> nothing here for now
15:08:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:08:10 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:08:39 <kopecmartin> one patch, the s-rbac thing for devstack
15:08:45 <kopecmartin> i'll review after the meeting
15:09:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks
15:09:11 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:09:56 <kopecmartin> we're doing pretty good, even our gates as we don't have many rechecks
15:10:11 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:10:16 <kopecmartin> stable
15:10:16 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-zed&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:10:24 <kopecmartin> master
15:10:24 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:10:58 <kopecmartin> all seems good, i looked into the tempest-centos9-stream-fips job
15:11:06 <kopecmartin> which has been timeouting for some time
15:11:31 <kopecmartin> I have a WIP patch
15:11:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/863163
15:11:45 <kopecmartin> it turned out that the tests, some of them, take longer on a fips env
15:12:01 <kopecmartin> VMs take longer to spawn
15:12:30 <kopecmartin> i'll add the tests which take the most of the time , more than 180seconds or so, to the exclude list
15:13:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:13:11 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:13:11 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:13:16 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:13:16 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:13:23 <kopecmartin> debian
15:13:23 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:13:29 <kopecmartin> jammy
15:13:29 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0
15:13:37 <kopecmartin> rocky
15:13:42 <kopecmartin> https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx
15:13:56 <frickler> c9s seems failing and thus blocking on yoga
15:14:11 <frickler> debian likely broken with some openssl issue on master
15:14:42 <dansmith> I was getting failures to stack on my focal setup yesterday,
15:14:48 <frickler> I'll try to look at the latter, but help is welcome for both
15:14:51 <dansmith> due to inability to validate a certificate or something
15:14:55 <dansmith> is that related?
15:15:16 <dansmith> Certificate did not match expected hostname: 192.168.122.214. Certificate: {'subject': ((('organizationName', 'OpenStack'),), (('organizationalUnitName', 'DevStack Servers'),), <etc, >
15:15:26 <frickler> oh, do we need a platform-focal job?
15:15:36 <frickler> dansmith: doesn't sound related
15:15:56 <dansmith> ack, I didn't debug much, but a clean deploy and re-stack gave me the same thing
15:16:21 <dansmith> I just keyed on openssl, carry on :)
15:17:36 * kopecmartin was checking the logs
15:17:46 <kopecmartin> frickler: i'll check into the logs later more closely
15:17:57 <gmann> I think we should add focal platform job as we will be supporting it in testing runtime - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860599
15:17:58 <frickler> ah, wait we didn't switch to jammy yet, we'll need platform-focal afterwards
15:18:35 <gmann> yeah
15:18:59 <kopecmartin> how long do we wanna wait until we switch to jammy?
15:19:03 <frickler> dansmith: but then focal is still our default platform, so since CI isn't completely broken, it very likely is something about your local setup
15:19:44 <dansmith> frickler: yeah, I know we're still running focal (which is why I am) so must be, but since you mentioned some openssl thing I was hoping there was a lead already
15:19:44 <gmann> kopecmartin: plan is to do on m-1 (Nov 18)
15:19:54 <kopecmartin> ack
15:20:00 <gmann> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/migrate-to-jammy
15:21:29 <kopecmartin> good, moving on
15:21:29 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:21:34 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:21:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:21:52 <kopecmartin> one patch, already workflowed
15:22:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:22:11 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:22:25 <dansmith> we did a bunch of DNM tests against this yesterday: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/814193
15:22:52 <dansmith> nova and glance are unaffected by the changes, and cinder seems good too.. no working version of that job, because devstack support is needed to even start fixing it
15:23:19 <dansmith> frickler was +2 before a tweak, so probably an easy thing to slam in and the cinder peeps are eager to get it
15:23:52 <frickler> I can have another look, ack
15:24:17 <frickler> but we'll need to fix bullseye first or make it n-v
15:28:42 <kopecmartin> yeah, i've just found a thread where someone hit the same issue with openssl
15:28:54 <kopecmartin> seems like they only updated the version
15:29:04 <kopecmartin> anyway, if we don't fix it soon, we can make the job n-v
15:29:16 <kopecmartin> anything else for the open discussion?
15:30:32 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:30:38 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-antelope
15:30:59 <kopecmartin> i've recorded the numbers although i haven't had time to triage anything
15:31:22 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side
15:31:25 <frickler> regarding storyboard for patrole, there is a discussion going on
15:31:25 <kopecmartin> thank you everyone
15:31:41 <frickler> lots of projects want to move back to LP
15:31:50 <kopecmartin> i'm not surprised
15:31:51 <frickler> maybe we should consider that, too?
15:32:16 <gmann> yeah we can move to LP but patrol is almost inactive now a days
15:32:31 <frickler> https://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/service-announce/2022-November/000048.html
15:32:33 <gmann> I kept fixing the gate but could not get chance to do that since last cycle
15:32:57 <frickler> should it be marked as abandoned then instead?
15:33:19 <gmann> we can wait for this cycle and decide.
15:33:37 <kopecmartin> we had this discussion during the previous ptg IIRC
15:33:37 <gmann> and may be keep it in SB if we see there are high chance it will be retired
15:33:48 <kopecmartin> and we decided to keep it around in case it would be needed for s-rbac
15:34:02 <kopecmartin> we were hoping that someone new will start taking care of the project
15:34:27 <kopecmartin> yeah, let's wait and discuss during the next PTG
15:34:32 <gmann> yeah
15:34:51 <kopecmartin> anything else?
15:35:23 <kopecmartin> ack, see you
15:35:24 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting