15:00:27 #startmeeting qa 15:00:27 Meeting started Tue Dec 6 15:00:27 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:27 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 15:00:35 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 15:00:39 agenda ^ 15:01:43 \o 15:05:30 o/ 15:05:35 seems it's just 2 of us 15:05:54 cool, let's go through the usual irst 15:05:56 first 15:06:09 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 15:06:12 nothing new here 15:06:17 #topic Antelope Priority Items progress 15:06:21 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-priority 15:06:26 * kopecmartin checking the status 15:07:27 slaweq is pretty active with the cleanup, but it seems there are issues still with neutron-tempest-plugin jobs 15:08:42 that's great we have some progress there, thanks slaweq 15:08:53 kopecmartin np 15:09:07 yes, I still have some issues with neutron-tempest-plugin jobs and I'm working on it 15:09:15 hopefully this week it will be ready to review finally :) 15:09:37 sounds good :) 15:10:19 there has been a development in the srbac jobs in tempest 15:10:20 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/614484 15:10:37 although now we're having a problem with the multinode job, has been failing recently :/ 15:11:10 something with cirros, is it possible your cirros bump would help frickler? 15:11:11 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/859773 15:11:15 let me find the issue 15:11:44 i think the job hit something similar to this 15:11:45 #link https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/issues/9935 15:11:51 I would need to check that, sadly there are other issues still with new cirros 15:12:07 oh, so we can't proceed with that? 15:12:44 I didn't look for some time, need to refresh myself on the current status. 15:13:24 but there were some things with neutron still I think, where I wasn't sure how things are supposed to work 15:14:02 i see , ack 15:14:37 moving on 15:14:40 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 15:14:43 sipping for now 15:14:46 #topic Gate Status Checks 15:14:50 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:15:05 nothing there, any urgent / gate blocking patch to reviews? 15:15:24 I don't think so 15:15:51 cool 15:15:52 #topic Bare rechecks 15:15:57 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary 15:16:04 we're at 0% out of 11 rechecks, pretty good 15:16:28 #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 15:16:31 stable 15:16:31 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-zed&pipeline=periodic-stable 15:16:38 master 15:16:39 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic 15:17:53 regarding the c9 fips job 15:18:12 it was discussed and decided that just increasing the timeout will be the best idea 15:18:14 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 15:18:47 last week we also discussed removing devstack-no-tls-proxy job from stable branches 15:18:49 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/I4c0a5144da2549fe988bbabe8536e9a9873e1cf7 15:19:19 otherwise the periodic jobs look healthy 15:19:21 oh, I thought I'd approved those, will do now 15:19:58 thanks 15:20:01 for fips also there is a key in infra now from canonical to run fips on ubuntu 15:20:01 #topic Distros check 15:20:21 but I'm not sure who's working on creating actual jobs using it 15:20:52 yeah, i've heard that 15:21:07 having ubuntu job running on fips would potentially solve the timeout issue 15:21:17 i don't know that either :/ 15:21:36 let me write this up to the priority etherpad 15:22:31 i made a note of it in the etherpad, i'll fill the details after the meeting 15:22:36 cs-9 15:22:39 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 15:22:44 fedora 15:22:44 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0 15:22:51 debian 15:22:51 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0 15:22:57 ubuntu 15:22:57 https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=0 15:23:03 rocky 15:23:03 https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx 15:23:34 * kopecmartin checking the failures 15:24:51 not many failures, a few builds were aborted, but otherwise they're pretty successful 15:25:03 #topic Sub Teams highlights 15:25:06 Changes with Review-Priority == +1 15:25:12 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:25:54 2 reviews, one is failing on the multinode job 15:25:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1998916 15:26:08 i need to have a closer look 15:27:58 the other looks good, +w 15:28:06 #topic Open Discussion 15:28:11 anything for the open discussion? 15:28:45 maybe talk about openeuler once more? 15:28:49 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/852237 15:29:48 IMO we could merge it 15:30:10 yeah, it looks quite stable now 15:30:26 I know we said at the ptg to wait for a cycle, but I don't think it will get better or worse 15:30:50 ok, i'll review later today, need to double check that with the review where we removed support for it 15:31:02 gmann: wdyt^ ? 15:31:26 I didn't do a complete review of the latest state yet either, but if we agree to move on with it, I'll do that 15:32:00 i agree, the only reason we removed the support was that it was failing an no one cared 15:32:16 if it is stable now, i have nothing against 15:32:53 anything else? 15:33:20 btw gmann, any thoughts on this? 15:33:22 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/821732 15:33:34 #topic Bug Triage 15:33:38 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-antelope 15:33:43 numbers were recorded 15:34:10 other than that i don't have anything else 15:35:07 * frickler neither 15:36:58 ok then, let's call it for today 15:37:11 thanks frickler, see you around 15:37:18 #endmeeting