15:00:16 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:16 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jan 10 15:00:16 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:16 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:16 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:24 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
15:00:27 <kopecmartin> agenda ^
15:01:22 <frickler> o/
15:01:28 <lpiwowar> Hi o/
15:01:35 <kopecmartin> \o
15:03:36 <kopecmartin> let's get started
15:03:39 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:03:56 <kopecmartin> this is the first qa office hour this year \o/
15:03:56 <kopecmartin> happy new year everyone
15:04:08 <lpiwowar> Happy new year! \o/
15:04:24 <kopecmartin> also a planning for the next PTG has started but more about that in a second
15:04:54 <kopecmartin> #topic Antelope Priority Items progress
15:04:55 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-priority
15:05:10 * kopecmartin checking the status as it's been a while
15:06:40 <frickler> lib/neutron cleanup seems finished
15:06:59 <slaweq> yeap, all is done AFAICT
15:07:55 <kopecmartin> great news, yup, it looks done
15:08:17 <kopecmartin> btw, slaweq what about this "Decide which job variant should become the new tempest default"?
15:08:22 <kopecmartin> I see the review merged
15:08:28 <kopecmartin> is there anything else that needs to be done?
15:09:52 <slaweq> kopecmartin IIRC conclusion was that we should move grenade jobs to run ovn backend by default
15:09:53 <slaweq> and keep it with ovn like it is currently
15:09:53 <slaweq> that's done, let me find patches
15:10:14 <slaweq> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/862475
15:10:29 <slaweq> this is patch which changed it
15:10:29 <kopecmartin> yup, this one's there and merged
15:11:00 <frickler> I also wonder if we should add ceph@jammy to that list for tracking, otherwise I fear we'll have a release without proper ceph testing
15:11:35 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin: What about the "unit test coverage"? Do we want it? I think it should be a simple patch.
15:12:23 <kopecmartin> frickler: to the list within "Decide which job variant should become the new tempest default"?
15:12:48 <frickler> no, as a dedicated topic for A
15:12:57 <kopecmartin> lpiwowar: we do want it, but that task is great for a new contributor and we can wait a bit with that
15:13:08 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin: ack
15:13:09 <kopecmartin> frickler: right, i see, yes, we can do that
15:15:05 <frickler> o.k., added, will fill in some details later
15:15:17 <kopecmartin> frickler: perfect, thank you
15:15:46 <kopecmartin> that leaves us with one last effort for the cycle - "Use admin clients *only if* admin access needed"
15:16:09 <kopecmartin> arxcruz: anything new ^?
15:16:23 <kopecmartin> just wondering, i know it's quite early in the year
15:16:23 <arxcruz> kopecmartin: nope
15:16:37 <kopecmartin> ack
15:17:07 <kopecmartin> moving on then
15:17:08 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
15:17:25 <kopecmartin> the name of the next release is Bobcat
15:17:37 <kopecmartin> we can already register for the next virtual PTG
15:17:48 <kopecmartin> I've signed QA team up already
15:18:04 <kopecmartin> i'll create etherpad for gathering topics to discuss soon
15:18:35 <kopecmartin> the date of the PTG is March 27-31, 2023
15:18:40 <kopecmartin> #link https://openinfra.dev/ptg/
15:20:45 * kopecmartin updated the office hour wiki page
15:20:47 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:20:54 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:21:04 <kopecmartin> nothing there, anything urgent to review?
15:23:01 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks
15:23:06 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:23:48 <kopecmartin> QA is at ~18% - 28 bare rechecks out of 158
15:24:40 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:24:46 <kopecmartin> stable
15:24:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-zed&pipeline=periodic-stable
15:24:54 <kopecmartin> master
15:24:56 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:25:18 <kopecmartin> looks good
15:25:41 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:25:48 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:25:49 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:25:54 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:25:55 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:26:01 <kopecmartin> debian
15:26:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:26:07 <kopecmartin> focal
15:26:07 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=0
15:26:13 <kopecmartin> rocky
15:26:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx
15:26:58 <kopecmartin> wau, it looks better than ever \o/
15:27:21 <frickler> pretty green indeed
15:27:32 <kopecmartin> a great start of the year
15:28:49 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:28:54 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:28:58 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:29:19 <kopecmartin> 2 reviews
15:29:32 <kopecmartin> one in gate queue already
15:29:38 <kopecmartin> the second
15:29:41 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/869440
15:29:50 <kopecmartin> gmann: when you have sec, can you have a look ^ ? thanks
15:30:10 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:30:14 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:30:45 <frickler> we should at least mention the tox 4 fun once
15:30:55 <frickler> seems to be mostly under control by now
15:31:03 <kopecmartin> yes, i was about to
15:31:12 <kopecmartin> thanks to the workarounds it looks ok, true
15:31:26 <kopecmartin> although it was pointed out on the ML that devstack unnecessary installs tox several times
15:31:34 <kopecmartin> and that hasn't been addressed yet
15:31:48 <kopecmartin> it kinda relates to the issues we've seen with tox4
15:32:22 <lpiwowar> I'm working on the fix of the tempest-multinode-full-py3 job. I'm still unsuccessful. If someone has some input I would be really grateful:)
15:32:44 <lpiwowar> ^^ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866692
15:34:33 <kopecmartin> quite important to mention that it's probably not a tempest's bug, it somehow fails because of the cirros image
15:34:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1998916
15:35:12 <kopecmartin> lpiwowar: let's try to raise the cirros issue on ML, maybe someone will have more insight
15:35:26 <frickler> cirros seems to have some issues in the CI in general, yes
15:35:39 <frickler> didn't get to investigate further yet
15:35:53 <frickler> some might be due to network initialization
15:36:00 <kopecmartin> yeah :/ we tried to bump the version but that didn't help
15:36:05 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin: Ok, I will do that:)
15:36:23 <frickler> https://github.com/cirros-dev/cirros/issues/97
15:37:09 <frickler> is there something you need the updated cirros for?
15:37:22 <kopecmartin> that could be related, it would explain the timeouts
15:37:43 <kopecmartin> frickler: no, we just wanted to verify if the error can be reproduced with newer version of cirros or it's been fixed
15:38:59 <frickler> o.k., it seems neutron also has some issues with updating cirros, so I'd suggest to stick to 0.5.x for now
15:39:14 <lpiwowar> I think that it might be also possible that it is not caused by the cirros image. Today encountered a error: "Instance f4e582fe-52e6-40e3-b366-2b11ed589089 could not be found."
15:39:24 <frickler> as sad as that makes me with my cirros hat on
15:40:02 <lpiwowar> I will investigate a bit more and write the email on ML and give an update next week.
15:40:25 <frickler> ok
15:40:39 <kopecmartin> thanks
15:41:06 <kopecmartin> btw regarding the tox4, maybe that could be another item in the priority etherpad - to get rid of multiple tox installations
15:41:14 <kopecmartin> in devstack
15:43:02 <frickler> is that for the tempest part? or in some larger context?
15:43:44 <clarkb> ovn stuff installs it which conflicts with the efforts gmann made to pin tox
15:44:04 <clarkb> it sounds like it is installed via ansible somewhere for devstack and also at least by the ovn tooling and maybe also by tempest stuff
15:44:33 <clarkb> probably want a central "install_tox" function that can check if it is already installed and if not install the desired version then everything can call that
15:45:20 <clarkb> separately tempest is installed with tox many redundant times too
15:45:44 <frickler> ah, ok, install_tox() sounds like a good idea
15:48:06 <kopecmartin> sorry , i had to go to another meeting
15:48:12 <kopecmartin> anything else for the open discussion?
15:48:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:48:59 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-antelope
15:49:04 <kopecmartin> numbers recorded
15:49:15 <kopecmartin> that's unfortunately all i had time for
15:49:45 <kopecmartin> if there isn't anything else , let's close this for today
15:49:49 <kopecmartin> thanks everyone :)
15:49:55 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting