15:00:17 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa 15:00:17 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Feb 14 15:00:17 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:17 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:17 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 15:00:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 15:00:28 <kopecmartin> agenda ^ 15:00:40 <frickler> \o 15:01:24 <kopecmartin> o/ 15:03:14 <kopecmartin> let's start 15:03:22 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 15:03:29 <kopecmartin> OpenStack Elections, PTL Nominations 15:03:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ 15:03:45 <kopecmartin> TC and PTL nominations are in progress till tomorrow! 15:03:51 <frickler> are you going to go again? or should we consider DPL? 15:04:15 <kopecmartin> i wanted to ask if there is anyone who would like to try that 15:04:23 <kopecmartin> but if not, i'll continue 15:05:13 <frickler> I would join in a shared DPL setup, but not as PTL, so if you want to continue with that, I'm fine 15:07:37 <kopecmartin> a quick read on DPL model 15:07:39 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project-leadership.html#how-distributed-leadership-works 15:08:06 <kopecmartin> hmm, i've been a PTL for 4 cycles, i mean, i wouldn't be against a small change, especially if projects will benefit from it 15:08:23 <kopecmartin> so if a DPL is something we would want, i don't see a downside 15:10:21 <frickler> it was just the idea that I had when I saw that you didn't submit a candidacy yet. if you still intend to do that, we don't need to change, you're doing a good job 15:10:49 <frickler> and I don't think having dpl will solve the lack-of-contributors issue, either 15:11:53 <kopecmartin> i didn't submit because i wanted to give a chance to others .. 15:11:58 <kopecmartin> yeah, ok then :) 15:12:39 <kopecmartin> probably not worth of officially changing that if nothing will practically change 15:13:14 <kopecmartin> moving on 15:13:15 <kopecmartin> #topic Antelope Priority Items progress 15:13:19 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-priority 15:13:25 <frickler> well you could get rid of the candidacy issue every 6 months if you wanted ;) 15:13:25 <kopecmartin> any updates? 15:13:37 <kopecmartin> :D that's true 15:14:02 <frickler> I saw a fips patch earlier 15:14:30 <kopecmartin> oh, yeha 15:14:32 <kopecmartin> this one 15:14:34 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/866881 15:14:36 <kopecmartin> it got merged 15:14:59 <frickler> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/871606 15:15:04 <kopecmartin> then there we have this one which is in progress 15:15:05 <frickler> this one I meant 15:15:07 <kopecmartin> yup, that one 15:15:21 <frickler> seems rocky is broken, but unrelated to that patch 15:15:49 <kopecmartin> uff 15:15:51 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx&project=openstack/devstack 15:17:29 <frickler> + inc/python:pip_install:190 : sudo -H LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=stdlib http_proxy= https_proxy= no_proxy= PIP_FIND_LINKS= python3.9 -m pip install -c /opt/stack/requirements/upper-constraints.txt -U os-testr 15:17:33 <frickler> /usr/bin/python3.9: No module named pip 15:18:53 <kopecmartin> that's new, why so suddenly 15:19:13 <frickler> ah, there's a different dnf issue earlier 15:19:28 <frickler> package curl-minimal-7.76.1-19.el9_1.1.x86_64 conflicts with curl provided by curl-7.76.1-19.el9_1.1.x86_64 15:19:45 <frickler> that causes python3-pip not to be installed 15:20:01 <frickler> might be some mirror update issue 15:20:32 <frickler> I'll check the infra side, but we can go on for now I guess 15:20:49 <kopecmartin> ack, thanks 15:21:18 <kopecmartin> oh, as i see srbac in the etherpad, that reminds me 15:21:40 <kopecmartin> i've noticed that most of the plugins don't have jobs with enforce scope enabled 15:22:03 <kopecmartin> should they tested against that too? at least to make sure everything works (all tests pass as usual)? 15:22:05 <kopecmartin> gmann: ? ^ 15:22:37 <kopecmartin> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 15:22:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bobcat-ptg 15:22:46 <kopecmartin> if you have any ideas for the topics to discuss over the ptg, then ^^ 15:23:27 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks 15:23:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:23:44 <kopecmartin> there is one review, which i rechecked 15:24:04 <kopecmartin> anything urgent to review? 15:24:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks 15:25:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary 15:25:06 <kopecmartin> that looks well 15:25:10 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 15:25:17 <kopecmartin> stable 15:25:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-zed&pipeline=periodic-stable 15:25:22 <kopecmartin> master 15:25:23 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic 15:26:58 <kopecmartin> tempest-full-test-account-no-admin-py3 fails 15:27:04 <kopecmartin> we have a LP for that 15:27:05 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1996624 15:28:17 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check 15:28:17 <kopecmartin> cs-9 15:28:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 15:28:19 <kopecmartin> fedora 15:28:21 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0 15:28:23 <kopecmartin> debian 15:28:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0 15:28:27 <kopecmartin> focal 15:28:29 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=0 15:28:31 <kopecmartin> rocky 15:28:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx 15:28:35 <kopecmartin> openEueler 15:28:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0 15:28:39 <kopecmartin> the rocky one is broken as we discussed already 15:29:09 <kopecmartin> the rest seems good, a few retry errors, but all at the same time so that was probably infrastructure related 15:30:14 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights 15:30:21 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1 15:30:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:30:43 <kopecmartin> 2 reviews there currently being tested by the CI 15:30:55 <kopecmartin> already approved 15:31:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion 15:31:10 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion? 15:31:41 <frickler> it seems we don't have a mirror for rocky, so that would be an upstream issue 15:31:56 <frickler> do we want to make the job non-voting for now to unblock the ci? 15:32:36 <kopecmartin> frickler: i'd say yes 15:33:05 <kopecmartin> we're still fighting with the timeout issues, there are several patches up to deal with that so let's not get blocked even more on those 15:33:27 <frickler> ok 15:33:56 <kopecmartin> (gmann) PyPi additional maintainers audit for QA repo 15:34:00 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-pypi-maintainers-cleanup 15:34:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031848.html 15:34:29 <kopecmartin> i've sent an email and i think tha tmost of the maintainers removed themselves , i need to check 15:36:57 <kopecmartin> there are still 3 packages to be addressed 15:37:09 <kopecmartin> i haven't found everyone's email though 15:37:16 <kopecmartin> bashate from repo openstack/bashate contains additional maintainer corvus 15:37:21 <kopecmartin> os-performance-tools from repo openstack/os-performance-tools contains additional maintainer SpamapS 15:37:29 <kopecmartin> patrole from repo openstack/patrole contains additional maintainer DavidPurcell 15:37:35 <kopecmartin> these 3 left 15:38:03 <frickler> corvus is in #opendev 15:38:38 <frickler> that's James Blair, the zuul PTL 15:38:52 <kopecmartin> cool, i'll reach out 15:40:04 <frickler> the other's are no longer active in openstack I think 15:40:31 <kopecmartin> good to know, thank you frickler 15:41:02 <kopecmartin> oh, one more thing, seems that the cirros bump has a problem with fedora job , well the other way around 15:41:03 <kopecmartin> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/859773 15:42:28 <frickler> on the last attempt a lot of other jobs failed, too 15:42:50 <kopecmartin> yeah, so it might be related to the timeout issues we had last week (and still have) 15:42:55 <kopecmartin> it might be just a coincidence 15:42:59 <kopecmartin> worth of recheck probably 15:43:32 <kopecmartin> the last thing on the agenda is 15:43:33 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage 15:43:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-antelope 15:43:57 <kopecmartin> numbers recorded, that's unfortunately all i had time for 15:44:26 <kopecmartin> anyway, that's all from my side 15:45:19 <kopecmartin> if there isn't anything else , let's call it an hour :) 15:45:43 <frickler> ah 15:45:45 <frickler> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/871641 15:45:55 <frickler> regarding the new in-progress bug 15:46:10 <kopecmartin> oh, i forgot about that 15:46:42 <frickler> I had made some comments on the patch, maybe you can find the issue 15:47:43 <kopecmartin> thanks, i'll try 15:48:54 <kopecmartin> thanks for the reminder frickler, see you around 15:48:55 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting