15:00:22 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:22 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jun 20 15:00:22 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:22 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:22 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:30 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
15:00:33 <kopecmartin> agenda ^^^
15:01:09 <lpiwowar> o/
15:01:52 <frickler> \o
15:02:41 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:03:11 <kopecmartin> we had a PTG in person last week, during the openinfra summit in vancouver
15:03:26 <kopecmartin> me, lpiwowar and gmann covered a few topics
15:03:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/vancouver-june2023-qa
15:04:42 <kopecmartin> i don't have any other updates, i'm still catching up, I arrived very early in the morning today ...
15:05:11 <kopecmartin> #topic Bobcat Priority Items progress
15:05:17 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bobcat-priority
15:05:28 <kopecmartin> any updates on any of those?
15:06:23 <lpiwowar> nothing from me
15:07:37 <frickler> nope, help still wanted for debian / global venv
15:09:11 <kopecmartin> ack
15:09:12 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:09:20 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:09:39 <kopecmartin> nothing there
15:09:39 <kopecmartin> any urgent patches to review?
15:10:44 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks
15:10:48 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:11:06 <kopecmartin> oh, no updates recently .. summit
15:11:25 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:11:25 <kopecmartin> periodic stable full
15:11:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic-stable&job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-zed&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1
15:11:27 <kopecmartin> periodic stable slow
15:11:29 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-slow-2023-1&job_name=tempest-slow-zed&job_name=tempest-slow-yoga&job_name=tempest-slow-xena
15:11:31 <kopecmartin> periodic extra tests
15:11:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-2023-1-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-zed-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-yoga-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-xena-extra-tests
15:11:35 <kopecmartin> periodic master
15:11:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:12:15 <kopecmartin> tempest-all and tempest-slow-2023-1 time out :/
15:13:12 <kopecmartin> we talked about that 2 weeks ago, didn't we?
15:13:19 <kopecmartin> let me check, i don't remember how we closed that
15:14:08 <kopecmartin> oh, yeah, i wanted to increase the timeout limit
15:14:10 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/885370
15:14:21 <kopecmartin> but that won't work, we are already at the maximum
15:15:09 <kopecmartin> need to do a bit of analysis and move some tests from those jobs that timeout to different ones .. that's also what gmann commented in the review ^^
15:18:33 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:18:33 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:18:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:18:35 <kopecmartin> fedora
15:18:36 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0
15:18:38 <kopecmartin> debian
15:18:40 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0
15:18:42 <kopecmartin> focal
15:18:44 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=0
15:18:47 <kopecmartin> rocky
15:18:48 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx
15:18:50 <kopecmartin> openEuler
15:18:52 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0
15:20:29 <kopecmartin> everything seems to fail over the last 2 days
15:20:36 <kopecmartin> there will be something not distro related
15:21:09 <kopecmartin> fedora jobs are about to be removed, iirc
15:21:32 <kopecmartin> yup, found it
15:21:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/885467
15:23:38 <kopecmartin> the other jobs failed with
15:23:42 <kopecmartin> "public endpoint for volumev3 service in RegionOne region not found"
15:24:11 <frickler> that's just one patch by gtema that is broken afaict
15:24:21 <frickler> s/broken/needing some sdk fix
15:24:35 <kopecmartin> oh, right, i didn't notice that they all have the same change id :D
15:24:36 <kopecmartin> sorry
15:24:41 <frickler> https://review.opendev.org/886339
15:25:04 <frickler> the actual error happens earlier
15:25:21 <frickler> we might need to check our failure detection
15:25:55 <frickler> check for: NameError: name 'open' is not defined
15:26:03 <frickler> in oscwrap call
15:28:09 <frickler> cf. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/886341 for the fix
15:32:54 <kopecmartin> sorry, i'm on another meeting at the same time
15:33:05 <kopecmartin> so the patch you shared has implications to devstack?
15:35:19 <frickler> 886339 tries to make devstack faster by having caching in sdk/osc
15:35:49 <frickler> and the sdk patch is a fix that is needed to make that work
15:36:31 <frickler> but devstack consumes sdk from pypi not from git afaict, so it will need a release first
15:37:54 <kopecmartin> that's great, i think something like that was discussed also during the previous PTG - jobs, ansible plabyook use the tokens ineffectively together with loop cycles
15:38:29 <kopecmartin> that might help with the timeouts - less time deploying, more time can be spent on the tests \o/
15:39:40 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:39:44 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:39:49 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:40:17 <kopecmartin> all blocked on the CI :/
15:40:43 <frickler> fedora is also blocked on other projects
15:41:08 <frickler> I'm considering to defer that to the beginning of the next cycle, where we can be more pushy
15:41:36 <kopecmartin> yeah, i wanted to suggest to wait just for 2 weeks or so and then proceed :D
15:41:40 <frickler> same for focal removal. like today I saw that keystone is still running all their func testing on focal
15:42:04 <frickler> that will need some more global effort to get resolved I fear
15:43:29 <kopecmartin> yeah, especially due to the point gmann raised here
15:43:31 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/885468/1
15:43:45 <kopecmartin> but i'd be more pushy with fedora
15:44:58 <kopecmartin> reviewing job removals isn't that complicated so i'd wait only couple weeks and if the patches were depending on aren't merged, i'd remove fedora support from devstack .. reviews will fly faster when things are broken :D
15:45:48 <frickler> kopecmartin: ok, would you propose those patches for other projects? or gmann maybe? I lack a bit of motivation for that
15:46:39 <kopecmartin> sure, i'll do that
15:47:06 <kopecmartin> perfect procrastination task or this is a long meeting i'm bored task :D
15:47:14 <frickler> lol
15:47:51 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:47:56 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:48:04 <frickler> git_depth is still broken
15:49:04 <kopecmartin> yeah, we track it though
15:49:04 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/2023020
15:50:18 <frickler> did launchpad change their design or is it just me/my browser?
15:51:24 <kopecmartin> any specific change?
15:51:55 <frickler> I think just the Overview/Code/Bugs/... tabs look different
15:51:58 <kopecmartin> the upper menu is nicer
15:52:02 <kopecmartin> yeah, that
15:52:19 <kopecmartin> a bit of more modern design
15:53:58 <frickler> I also closed some bugs, hope I wasn't too harsh
15:54:51 <kopecmartin> although the "Further information" box when reporting a new bug has still fixed width :/
15:55:11 <kopecmartin> i noticed that when i was recording the current bug numbers
15:55:42 <kopecmartin> I don't think so , we need a certain activity from the reporters otherwise we can't proceed with our limited time and resources
15:55:56 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:56:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-bobcat
15:57:20 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side
15:57:32 <kopecmartin> if there isn't anything else, we can call it an hour
15:57:39 <kopecmartin> (in 3 minutes :D)
15:58:47 <kopecmartin> thank you everyone
15:58:47 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting