15:00:19 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:19 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 22 15:00:19 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:19 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:19 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
15:00:30 <kopecmartin> agenda ^
15:01:51 <lpiwowar> o/
15:01:57 <frickler> \o
15:02:13 <kopecmartin> \o/
15:02:31 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
15:02:39 <kopecmartin> PTL and TC nominations are ongoing
15:02:44 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/
15:02:56 <kopecmartin> let me know if anyone wanted to be the PTL for QA
15:03:38 <kopecmartin> if there are not candidates, I'll continue :) but if there are, please, go ahead as i've been the PTL for several cycles already
15:03:58 <frickler> I'm quite fine with you doing most of the work ;-P
15:04:21 <kopecmartin> I don't feel like i'm doing any work apart from administration :D
15:04:58 <frickler> but that's exactly the part that I don't want to do, so good fit ;)
15:05:18 <kopecmartin> :D okey then
15:05:55 <kopecmartin> moving on
15:05:55 <kopecmartin> #topic Bobcat Priority Items progress
15:06:00 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bobcat-priority
15:06:06 <kopecmartin> uf, any news?
15:06:11 * kopecmartin checking the doc
15:07:22 <frickler> couple of hickups from global venv still
15:07:44 <frickler> after nova cli get removed, rally found out that they were using it, too
15:07:57 <frickler> but got fixed on their side now
15:08:40 <frickler> also https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/2031639
15:09:34 <kopecmartin> right, a similar issue is seen in centos9 jobs
15:09:41 <kopecmartin> maybe we could rename that LP
15:09:52 <kopecmartin> or create a new one for centos9?
15:10:24 <frickler> you can rename it to include all affected distros
15:10:49 <frickler> and maybe instead of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/891517 change the default in devstack
15:10:56 <frickler> depending on distro
15:11:22 <frickler> because that will help non-tempest-consumers, too
15:11:29 <kopecmartin> ack, i also put the LP the priority etherpad
15:11:35 <kopecmartin> right, that would be much smarter!
15:12:57 <kopecmartin> ok, so AI for me is to rename the LP to address all other affected distros plus propose a patch to devstack to temporarily overwrite the default value for centos9
15:13:08 <kopecmartin> as that distro fails on several places
15:13:59 <kopecmartin> moving on
15:14:01 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:14:07 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:14:21 <kopecmartin> no patches there
15:14:24 <kopecmartin> anything urgent to review/
15:14:25 <kopecmartin> ?
15:14:49 <frickler> I don't think so
15:15:12 <lpiwowar> Can somebody take a look at this tempest patch? I was contacted by Tianqi and she waits for the review. Looks like she put a lot of work into the patch => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/889664
15:15:50 <kopecmartin> gmann: ^ I don't think i can objectively verify the changes in creds files :/
15:16:11 <kopecmartin> we'll get to it lpiwowar
15:16:46 <kopecmartin> #topic Bare rechecks
15:16:52 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary
15:16:53 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin: got it:), I just wanted to mention it here. I added a comment as well but I am not sure about some things in the review as well.
15:17:08 <kopecmartin> yeah, me too, thanks lpiwowar
15:17:46 <kopecmartin> we haven't had any recheck in QA for the past 7 days o.O \o/ nice!
15:18:06 <lpiwowar> \o/
15:18:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:18:59 <kopecmartin> periodic stable full
15:18:59 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic-stable&job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-zed&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1
15:19:00 <kopecmartin> periodic stable slow
15:19:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-slow-2023-1&job_name=tempest-slow-zed&job_name=tempest-slow-yoga&job_name=tempest-slow-xena
15:19:04 <kopecmartin> periodic extra tests
15:19:06 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-2023-1-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-zed-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-yoga-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-xena-extra-tests
15:19:08 <kopecmartin> periodic master
15:19:10 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:19:28 <kopecmartin> all green \o/ but the centos-9 and one other job (known issue)
15:19:43 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:19:43 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:19:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:19:45 <kopecmartin> debian
15:19:47 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bookworm&skip=0
15:19:49 <kopecmartin> focal
15:19:51 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=0
15:19:53 <kopecmartin> rocky
15:19:55 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx
15:19:57 <kopecmartin> openEuler
15:19:59 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0
15:20:06 <kopecmartin> jup, centos-9 ...
15:20:19 <kopecmartin> the rest is ok though
15:21:08 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:21:11 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:21:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:21:17 <kopecmartin> no patches
15:21:22 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:21:24 <frickler> yes
15:21:26 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:21:31 <frickler> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/891353
15:21:42 <frickler> I just set RP+1 to it a minute age ;)
15:22:00 <kopecmartin> :)
15:22:18 <frickler> I didn't review it myself yet, but I think it is important to move away from eol etcd
15:23:36 <frickler> but I wonder why bashate doesn't complain about the tab in there
15:23:46 <frickler> must be a gap in testing
15:23:55 <kopecmartin> just commenting that
15:25:56 <kopecmartin> right, anything else to go over?
15:27:04 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:27:09 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-bobcat
15:27:16 <lpiwowar> It is small thing. I remind this patch every week now.  => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/890798
15:27:37 <lpiwowar> It is not urgent:).
15:27:55 <kopecmartin> right, i believe gmann has it on his review list but he's been/was on PTO ..
15:28:05 <kopecmartin> (if i remember correctly)
15:28:35 <kopecmartin> i'd wait for his feedback as he had latest comments on that
15:28:51 <kopecmartin> i wanna mention this LP
15:28:54 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/2029335
15:29:04 <kopecmartin> and its relation to this patch
15:29:06 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/892090
15:29:34 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin: +1
15:29:35 <kopecmartin> not sure if the LP was caused by the original patch and the revert fixes that, or the revert is just a workaround
15:29:41 <frickler> oh, I just marked that bug as resolved
15:30:07 <kopecmartin> perfect
15:30:13 <frickler> the LP was caused by a bug in centos. the patch made a workaround
15:30:28 <frickler> now centos is fixed and the workaround was removed
15:30:44 <kopecmartin> i see, thanks
15:30:53 <frickler> but we should likely reconsider whether we want to support centos as platform
15:31:07 <frickler> or make everyone use rocky instead for the next cycle
15:31:42 <frickler> rocky has been very stable in comparison, at least that's my impression
15:32:04 <kopecmartin> seems like both (centos stream and rocky) are under Best Effort now
15:32:05 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/2023.2.html
15:32:21 <kopecmartin> but i understand
15:33:04 <frickler> "best effort" means we do not need to support them in devstack
15:33:09 <kopecmartin> if it's under Best Effort, i'd like to have at least some jobs, if centos will be failing too much, we can replace it with rocky on some places to save some resources
15:33:14 <kopecmartin> hmm
15:34:23 <frickler> and we really do lack people working on it, like for global venv support
15:34:34 <kopecmartin> yeah, that definitely
15:34:54 <kopecmartin> i don't have any answer now .. i need to gather more data first
15:35:33 <frickler> sure, we have a couple of weeks until branching anyway, I think
15:35:35 <opendevreview> Jan Gutter proposed openstack/devstack master: Update etcd version to 3.4.27  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/891353
15:37:09 <kopecmartin> frickler: ack, i'll try to keep this in mind and think about it
15:37:24 <kopecmartin> cool, if there isn't anything else, we can call it an hour
15:38:19 <frickler> ack
15:38:25 <kopecmartin> thank you everyone
15:38:29 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting