15:00:36 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
15:00:36 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Feb 20 15:00:36 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:36 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:36 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
15:00:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
15:01:27 <frickler> o/
15:02:04 <kopecmartin> o/
15:03:39 <frickler> announcement: TC and PTL nomination periods have started
15:04:11 <kopecmartin> right, thanks
15:04:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/
15:04:21 <kopecmartin> do we have any candidates?
15:04:30 <frickler> also train is completely eol now and ussuri will be very soon
15:04:50 * frickler has more than enough hats already
15:05:24 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/903204
15:05:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/903295
15:05:40 * kopecmartin will continue as PTL
15:05:47 <frickler> \o/
15:05:57 <kopecmartin> i just wanted to ask because I feel like I've been one for ever :D
15:07:07 <frickler> yes, and you're doing it well IMO. we sure could use more contributors, but I think they would/should become new cores first, PTL later
15:08:20 <kopecmartin> speaking about cores, I was wondering, what are new rules, in general - not just QA, for being considered as a core?
15:08:29 <kopecmartin> we've always had 'do reviews and patches'
15:08:33 <kopecmartin> but lately, we see
15:08:52 <kopecmartin> that the activity is decreasing, we simply don't have as many new patches as we had several years ago
15:09:12 <kopecmartin> should we adjust the metrics?
15:09:29 <frickler> so you fear that there aren't enough chances to do reviews?
15:10:13 <frickler> I would say we have enough other opportunities for contributions, like preparing 24.04 support
15:10:51 <kopecmartin> that's true
15:11:31 <kopecmartin> if anyone was simply around most of the time, we could consider them
15:12:21 <frickler> sure, but sadly I don't see anyone
15:12:41 <kopecmartin> yeah, me neither
15:13:35 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
15:13:36 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:13:36 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights
15:13:37 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1
15:13:39 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)
15:13:54 <kopecmartin> no reviews there .. anything to review?
15:14:29 <frickler> nothing I've seen
15:15:14 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
15:15:14 <kopecmartin> periodic stable full
15:15:14 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic-stable&job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-zed&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2
15:15:16 <kopecmartin> periodic stable slow
15:15:18 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-slow-2023-2&job_name=tempest-slow-2023-1&job_name=tempest-slow-zed&job_name=tempest-slow-yoga&job_name=tempest-slow-xena
15:15:20 <kopecmartin> periodic extra tests
15:15:22 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-2023-2-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-zed-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-yoga-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-xena-extra-tests
15:15:24 <kopecmartin> periodic master
15:15:26 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic
15:15:50 <kopecmartin> all is looking good \o/
15:16:21 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check
15:16:21 <kopecmartin> cs-9
15:16:21 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0
15:16:23 <kopecmartin> debian
15:16:25 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bookworm&skip=0
15:16:27 <kopecmartin> rocky
15:16:29 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx
15:16:31 <kopecmartin> openEuler
15:16:33 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0
15:16:35 <kopecmartin> jammy
15:16:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0
15:16:44 <frickler> hmm, we should drop yoga jobs before branching unmaintained, otherwise we're stuck with the periodic jobs until unstable team takes them over
15:16:55 <frickler> and probably drop xena too while at it
15:17:22 <frickler> ehm ... unmaintained, not unstable :D
15:17:47 <kopecmartin> :D
15:17:52 <kopecmartin> that's a good idea
15:17:54 <frickler> I'll propose patches for that
15:18:07 <kopecmartin> thank you, add me as a reviewer please
15:18:13 <frickler> sure
15:19:08 <kopecmartin> btw, centos-9 jobs are fixed
15:19:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-20609
15:19:57 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
15:19:57 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion?
15:20:56 <frickler> maybe just a note regarding the runtime discussion for the next cycle
15:21:27 <frickler> it has been propose to require py3.12 and I remarked that it would be good to do that only if we also can test that in devstack
15:21:57 <frickler> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/908862
15:23:07 * kopecmartin reading
15:23:20 <frickler> just mentioning if you (or some silent reader) want to join the discussion
15:23:42 <kopecmartin> sure
15:23:55 <kopecmartin> but python3.12 is a good idea
15:24:40 <clarkb> the opendev team is planning to cleanup opensuse leap, debian buster, centos 7, and ubuntu xenial nodes and mirror content in the nearish future
15:24:45 <clarkb> we'll probably go in that order too
15:25:31 <kopecmartin> sounds good, thanks
15:27:17 <frickler> that might need some cleanup in older stable branches, but no blocker IMO
15:27:45 <clarkb> ya those were chosen because we believe it to be fairly safe
15:28:03 <clarkb> bionic is still used by old branches for sure, but opendev itself may be the last major use of xenial for example. And we're happy to muddle through that on our end
15:28:57 <frickler> well actually we still have xenial nodesets defined even in devstack master
15:29:09 <clarkb> wow
15:29:17 <clarkb> that seems like a bug though right?
15:29:36 <clarkb> or at least not an intentional requirement
15:29:41 <frickler> well ... lack of cleanup at least, yes
15:30:26 <frickler> I can do a patch for that, too, and see if zuul complains about consumers
15:31:36 <kopecmartin> thank you frickler
15:32:33 <kopecmartin> cool, moving on, last item on the agenda is Bugs
15:32:35 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage
15:32:36 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-caracal
15:33:32 <kopecmartin> that's it, i don't have an yspecific LPs to bring up :/
15:34:39 <kopecmartin> if there isn't anything anything else , that's it for the office (half) hour
15:35:01 <kopecmartin> thank you everyone
15:35:06 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting