15:00:32 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa 15:00:32 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jun 25 15:00:32 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:32 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:32 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 15:00:38 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 15:01:56 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 15:02:38 <kopecmartin> i cancelled office hours on every odd week, at least for the summer, due to a small attendance 15:02:41 <lpiwowar> o/ 15:02:53 <kopecmartin> and 17:00 utc is quite late for me, especially during the summer 15:03:11 <frickler> +1 15:03:22 <kopecmartin> from now on, we'll have the office hour biweekly on tuesdays, practically every 2 weeks from today 15:03:40 <kopecmartin> every Tuesday (even weeks) at 15:00 UTC 15:03:49 <kopecmartin> o/ 15:04:28 <kopecmartin> #topic Dalmatian Priority Items progress 15:04:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-dalmatian-priority 15:04:39 <kopecmartin> do we have any updates on the priority items? 15:04:45 * kopecmartin checking 15:05:15 <frickler> noble support is kind of done, thx to sean-k-mooney and bauzas 15:05:35 <kopecmartin> yeah, thanks 15:05:49 <sean-k-mooney> i left it non voting ot see how it was for a week or so but we should fliip it to voting if it remains stables 15:06:37 <kopecmartin> +1 15:07:40 <kopecmartin> and that's about it, other priority items don't seem to have any updates 15:07:55 <kopecmartin> moving on 15:07:57 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks 15:07:57 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:08:40 <kopecmartin> maybe this time this will pass 15:08:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/922108 15:08:49 <kopecmartin> if not, the devstack change should help 15:09:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/922630 15:09:36 <kopecmartin> approved and we're waiting for the CI 15:09:49 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights 15:09:49 <kopecmartin> Changes with Review-Priority == +1 15:09:49 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) 15:10:37 <kopecmartin> 2 patches, one the devstack one mentioned above and the other depends on the tempest change mentioned above too 15:11:59 <kopecmartin> fingers crossed, hopefully those will get merged now 15:12:27 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 15:12:27 <kopecmartin> Periodic stable full: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic-stable&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2&job_name=tempest-full-2024-1 15:12:27 <kopecmartin> Periodic stable slow: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-slow-2024-1&job_name=tempest-slow-2023-2&job_name=tempest-slow-2023-1 15:12:29 <kopecmartin> Periodic extra tests: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-2024-1-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2023-1-extra-tests 15:12:31 <kopecmartin> Periodic master: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic 15:14:27 <kopecmartin> tempest-slow-2024-1 keeps failing a lot 15:15:44 <kopecmartin> it's mainly related to tempest.scenario.test_volume_migrate_attached.TestVolumeMigrateRetypeAttached tests 15:17:32 <kopecmartin> i'll try to dig more into that later 15:17:58 <kopecmartin> #topic Distros check 15:17:58 <kopecmartin> Centos 9: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 15:17:58 <kopecmartin> Debian: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bookworm&skip=0 15:18:00 <kopecmartin> Rocky: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx 15:18:02 <kopecmartin> openEuler: https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-openEuler-22.03-ovs&skip=0 15:18:04 <kopecmartin> jammy: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0 15:18:44 <kopecmartin> one this gets merged, I'll update these links in the agenda as we're removing the openeuler and bullseye jobs 15:18:45 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/922630 15:20:17 <kopecmartin> apart from the bullseye and openeuler builds, it looks quite ok 15:20:26 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion 15:20:27 <kopecmartin> anything for the open discussion? 15:21:16 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin: Can I raise the stackviz issue here or somewhere else? 15:21:38 <clarkb> there are still a lot of projects running fips jobs on centos 8 stream 15:21:57 <lpiwowar> We have an active development for stackviz. Austin Nazworth (a student who is part of the upstream mentorship program) is working on updating the depencencies for the project. 15:22:35 <lpiwowar> We were thinking whether it would be possible to create a dev branch for the stackviz repository as there are probably multiple separate patches needed that update the project to the newest dependencies. 15:23:23 <lpiwowar> Is it something that would be possible or we should just try to merge everything into main? 15:23:50 <kopecmartin> lpiwowar: master of stackviz is broken, i don't see a problem of merging the patches that are ready to master .. even if the whole effort of bringing stackviz to up-to-date is still WIP 15:23:53 <kopecmartin> gmann: wdyt? 15:24:03 <frickler> I have bad experience with dev branches, trying to do things in master would be better 15:24:21 <lpiwowar> kopecmartin, frickler: +1, thank you 15:24:37 <kopecmartin> +1 agree, i want to avoid unnecessary administration too (with creating the branch and then merging it to master .. ) 15:24:55 <kopecmartin> soo, the fips jobs 15:25:49 <kopecmartin> what do we want to do there? check the projects that use fips with cs8 whether they have fips on cs9 or rocky and if so, then remove the cs8 job, if not, try to update it to cs9/rocky? 15:26:09 <clarkb> it seems like there are c9s alternatives but ut might be good for the qa team to provide some guidance to projects 15:26:45 <clarkb> Mostly I want to call it out as a dead end and waste of resources 15:27:00 <frickler> iiuc there is no alternative to fips-c9s? 15:27:21 <clarkb> right c9s is the alternative to c8s 15:27:29 <clarkb> c8s is completely broken 15:28:35 <kopecmartin> hmm, ok, i can send an email to the ML to bring it up 15:28:59 <kopecmartin> I'll also check with Ade Lee although he's on PTO for the next 2 weeks or so 15:29:22 <kopecmartin> if the jobs are completely broken, I don't see a reason we should keep them around 15:29:41 <kopecmartin> i'll mention that in the email too, just to be transparent 15:29:45 <clarkb> correct, I'm going to delete the nodes entirely soon 15:29:53 <kopecmartin> good 15:30:25 <clarkb> but projects should be given some path forward and I'm not in a position to say what that should be 15:31:39 <kopecmartin> i see, if i recall correctly, the plan was to add some fips jobs on rocky, no idea what's the status of that now, i'll check that too 15:33:04 <kopecmartin> anything else for the open discussion? 15:34:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage 15:34:07 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-dalmatian 15:34:15 <kopecmartin> bug numbers are recorded ^ 15:34:21 <kopecmartin> the counts have been quite steady recently 15:34:33 <kopecmartin> aand that's it , if there isn't anything else, that's it 15:35:33 <kopecmartin> thank you all 15:35:37 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting