17:06:17 #startmeeting Rally 17:06:18 Meeting started Tue Mar 3 17:06:17 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is boris-42. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:06:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:06:22 The meeting name has been set to 'rally' 17:06:28 hello everbody 17:06:34 let's start from e0ne 17:06:42 #topic Cinder benchmarks 17:06:44 hi 17:06:47 e0ne: any updates ? 17:07:05 i've got a few 17:07:17 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152670/ - is blocked by ci 17:07:35 it's too hard to investigate issues w/o logs 17:08:41 and we'll continue to work on others banchmarks after cinderclient release 17:08:44 redixin: ping 17:08:52 pong 17:09:14 redixin: this patch is blocekd by CI 17:09:18 redixin: Mirantis CI 17:09:25 redixin: maybe you can take a look why it fails ? 17:09:31 sure 17:09:40 redixin: thank you 17:09:56 e0ne: so redixin is going to help you because it's Mirantis Rally CI god 17:10:13 boris-42, redixin: thanks 17:10:37 e0ne: anything else? 17:10:48 no, thats all from my side 17:10:53 except 17:10:58 e0ne: ? 17:11:33 we started investigation on cinder performance. rally on gates helps us. i'll post update next week 17:11:55 actully, it was found with rally 17:13:13 maybe submit a user story about that? 17:13:18 e0ne: yep 17:13:31 e0ne: we have in rally/doc/user_stories 17:13:38 e0ne: so it will be nice to contribute to it 17:13:41 e0ne: could you do it? 17:14:01 boris-42: need to take a look on it first 17:14:21 e0ne https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/doc/user_stories 17:14:40 e0ne: And then it is included in our docs http://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user_stories.html 17:15:01 e0ne: So it will be very nice if you add a user story 17:15:25 i won't promice anything except i'll take a look on it 17:16:40 e0ne: Anyway, if you have no time to write long texts, you can just send the data and the main points to me and I'll make a user story out of it. 17:16:55 okay 17:16:55 msdubov_: thanks 17:17:06 #topic Mirantis CI updates 17:17:13 redixin: please share updates to Mirantis CI 17:18:32 we have a new job ecli-py34-postgres, so rally will support py34 soon 17:19:16 also we will see "logs of all services" soon 17:19:44 redixin: so we need to merge patch from andreykurilin_ ? 17:19:52 not yet 17:19:59 redixin: or we are blocked by publishing results? 17:20:09 he wants to see command'd output, and this will be done soon too 17:20:30 redixin: great, could you concentrate on this stuff ^ 17:20:39 redixin: so we will get support of py34 soon? 17:20:52 yes, I want to be sure that all rally commands work as expected:) 17:20:59 in py34 env 17:21:27 we will got py34 after this job show us that everything works as expected 17:24:02 thats all i think 17:30:23 uh sry 17:30:34 #topic New Rally input format 17:30:44 Okay guys I see a lot of reviews 17:30:51 they are all quite small 17:31:03 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159065/ 17:31:09 redixin: ^ what do you think 17:31:23 echoingumesh: as well what do you think=) 17:31:55 msdubov_: what do you think is it good engouh? 17:32:00 boris-42: What do you think about my proposal about task modes (consequent/parallel)? 17:32:07 boris-42: That's the main point I had 17:32:14 i will take a look 17:32:15 msdubov_: so I think it's valid case 17:32:17 boris-42: As for the rest, seems ok 17:32:35 msdubov_: so like we can have scenario that will create image 17:32:35 boris-42: by 'valid' you mean that we can implement it this way? 17:32:40 msdubov_: then scenario that will delete them 17:32:46 boris-42: Yep 17:32:53 msdubov_: or just list() 17:33:00 msdubov_: so yep I will add that in new version 17:33:04 msdubov_: of review 17:33:18 boris-42: And with this modes the task would be a bit more readable, because now it's not obvious that the scenario are run in parallel... 17:33:52 boris-42: Great 17:34:16 others? 17:34:28 I think i like it 17:34:43 echoingumesh: do you find it simpler then previous one? 17:34:57 Yes 17:34:59 echoingumesh: if something is unclear it's better to change it now=) 17:35:54 echoingumesh: ok it's great the end users find format simpler 17:36:03 echoingumesh: it was as well one of the goal of refactoring format 17:37:05 okay let's move 17:37:27 #topic Open Discussion 17:37:40 Does somebody would like to discuss anything? 17:37:47 no 17:38:12 I'd like just once again to point to the update in docs: https://review.openstack.org/156093 17:38:21 Maybe we can have it in the next release as well 17:38:25 That would be nice 17:38:44 msdubov_: uuuuu 17:38:46 msdubov_: big one 17:38:51 msdubov_: I will take a look 17:39:06 boris-42: Actually not =) Mostly pictures + copy-paste of your blog post 17:39:23 msdubov_: ok I will take a look 17:39:30 msdubov_: btw we should add as well step 17:39:35 msdubov_: related to using templated task 17:39:46 msdubov_: maybe I will put some kind of new blogpost 17:39:52 boris-42:Agree 17:39:52 msdubov_: and you will just port it=) 17:40:16 boris-42: But let's not have too many steps 17:40:25 boris-42: Better no more than 10 17:44:55 So regarding to steps I think we should have 17:45:09 guide for various stuss 17:45:24 "rally verfiy step by step" "rally benchmarking step by step" 17:45:32 and so on 17:46:25 #topic new Reports 17:46:34 #topic new reports generation stuff 17:46:42 amaretskiy: hi 17:46:47 amaretskiy: any updated to graphs? 17:46:53 amaretskiy: where they will be? 17:47:00 I have submitted new patches regarding reports last week 17:47:10 amaretskiy: they were -1 by me 17:47:11 link please) 17:47:21 so big work was splitted into 2 patches 17:47:21 andreykurilin_: or? 17:47:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159458/ 17:47:35 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146814/ 17:47:40 amaretskiy: when you are going to do it normal way?) 17:47:56 this week 17:48:15 i'm currently finishing another patch + reviewing 17:48:20 amaretskiy: okay please try to avoid unclear stuff in code 17:48:24 amaretskiy: if it is possible 17:48:29 so I'm going to update these patches till friday 17:48:35 okay 17:48:58 amaretskiy: ok 17:49:15 boris-42: I hava a one question) 17:49:21 andreykurilin_: regarding to reports? 17:49:24 no 17:49:34 andreykurilin_: ok 17:49:41 #topic Open Discussion 17:49:45 andreykurilin_: so? 17:50:23 boris-42: Am I right thath we are waiting for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155225/ ? After this patch will be merged, new veriosn of rally will be released? 17:50:48 or what additional changes you want to see in 0.2.0 ? 17:51:01 andreykurilin_: this one is the most important 17:51:07 andreykurilin_: others are just nice to have 17:51:11 :) 17:51:23 andreykurilin_: so when we merge that patch 17:51:27 andreykurilin_: I will cut new version 17:51:53 boris-42: ok, I'll start reviewing it, right now:) 17:52:04 andreykurilin_: great I am going to re-review it as well 17:52:19 andreykurilin_: I need to test it one more time by hands 17:52:19 =) 17:52:25 heh 17:53:03 andreykurilin_: by the way it will be nice to fix py34 as well 17:53:18 =) 17:53:20 boris-42: yes 17:53:37 but this change need more time 17:53:45 andreykurilin_: okay then in next release 17:53:58 I want to test Rally in py31,py32,py33 envs 17:54:08 andreykurilin_: I think that can be done in next release 17:54:14 andreykurilin_: for now just add support for py34 17:54:17 step by step 17:54:27 boris-42: okey 17:54:36 andreykurilin_: so okay 17:54:46 any other questions? 17:54:48 boris-42: btw, how we can automate checking py31,py32,py33 ? 17:55:08 andreykurilin_: we can use Rally Mirantis CI for that 17:55:19 imo, there are no reasons to have separate jobs for each env 17:55:37 andreykurilin_: so we can have one job that has everything 17:55:49 andreykurilin_: but actually we don't need 17:56:02 andreykurilin_: because redixin is using lxc containers 17:56:15 andreykurilin_: so it's similar to create new job or run everything inside one job 17:56:45 boris-42: okey 17:57:04 okay 17:57:10 let's end meeting cause I have to go=) 17:57:21 see you guys 17:57:24 #endmeeting