14:04:29 #startmeeting rally 14:04:30 Meeting started Mon May 18 14:04:29 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is msdubov_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:04:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:04:33 The meeting name has been set to 'rally' 14:05:40 amaretskiy redixin rvasilets oanufriev Hi! 14:05:49 hi 14:05:53 hi 14:06:22 Let's start 14:06:27 \o/ 14:06:52 #topic [Spec] Enhance Rally API 14:07:01 #link https://review.openstack.org/182245 14:07:23 so let me remind you one more time about this important spec 14:07:39 Anybody reviewed it / has got questions? 14:08:53 I have no question. I think they would appeared just after a new implementation) 14:09:25 rvasilets better before 14:09:42 rvasilets tgat's why we have specs :) 14:10:25 Ok let's move 14:10:44 #topic Fuel benchmarks 14:11:02 amarerskiy tell us please about the progress 14:12:41 amaretskiy ^ 14:12:43 there is a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178731/ 14:12:53 it works fine for me 14:13:06 waiting for reviews 14:13:53 this patch registers fuel client dynamically (base for another fuel scenarios) + introduces simple scenario "list_environments" 14:13:56 eom 14:14:32 amaretskiy oanufriev what are the next steps? I mean those dependent WIP patches 14:15:30 this is the only fuel-related patch from my side 14:16:42 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182873/ 14:16:42 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181270/ 14:16:42 these two patches are next 14:16:56 i'm working on them yet 14:17:47 oanufriev amaretskiy ok thanks 14:18:51 #topic Splitting plugins in Rally 14:19:05 So seems like yfried is away 14:19:30 He's prepared a set of small patches 14:19:36 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/rally+branch:master+topic:bp/split-plugins,n,z 14:20:33 He splits everything to openstack-related/common plugins 14:21:31 according to his spec 14:21:33 amaretskiy redixin oanufriev rvasilets ^ should be easy to review 14:22:43 Yes this patches easy to review 14:23:26 I we need to care about backward compatibility?) 14:23:30 So let's do that 14:23:34 * are 14:24:12 rvasilets What will be not backward compatible after this change? 14:25:35 I'm not an expert in this question. But maybe there is a scenario plugin in companies that could be broken7 14:25:47 just question of nubie) 14:27:43 rvasilets Well I think since we don't rename plugins it will be no problem 14:28:17 ok 14:29:53 #topic Where to find answers 14:30:26 redixin this was your suggestion :) 14:30:40 redixin so what do you want to discuss? 14:39:46 Ok to answer his question, I believe this should answer the most questions :) http://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/project_info.html 14:40:08 #topic Free discussion 14:40:51 amaretskiy rvasilets oanufriev Anything else to discuss? 14:41:08 nope 14:41:10 no 14:43:02 Thanks 14:43:08 #endmeeting