14:03:14 #startmeeting Rally 14:03:15 Meeting started Mon Aug 1 14:03:14 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is andreykurilin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:03:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:03:18 The meeting name has been set to 'rally' 14:03:28 o/ 14:04:11 o? 14:05:18 hi 14:05:32 hi hi 14:07:10 ok 14:07:14 let's start 14:07:21 )) 14:07:31 #topic release news 14:07:37 free discussion?) 14:07:57 Long time ago we decided to have new release each 3 weeks 14:08:06 2 weeks are gone from previous one:) 14:08:21 )) 14:08:29 so next version of rally should be released next week 14:08:36 at monday-tuesday 14:08:58 I'll try to publish release notes at the end of the week 14:09:14 Lets in clude Monasca in this release) 14:09:17 Are there any known blockers? 14:09:34 Possibly no 14:09:40 rvasilets: it is already in merge queue 14:09:58 Horey! 14:10:34 that is all from my side:) 14:10:40 #topic Free discussion 14:10:57 #topic Services 14:11:02 I have one more topic 14:11:03 :) 14:11:35 Several month ago I published implementations of "services" which should replace wrappers 14:12:03 implementation became huge and someone thing that it is too complicated :) 14:12:25 Yeah 14:12:39 that is why noone wants to review it:) 14:13:27 while I thing that it is compicated since it prevents a bunch of possible issues, someone can disagree with me 14:13:30 so 14:13:32 He will be the next after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337115/9/rally/common/objects/credential.py for me 14:14:11 review was blocked be Boris. Boris please review it) 14:14:56 @andreykurilin: can you again review this, please? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329432 14:15:00 ok, so let's give ability to amaretskiy to provide an alternative implementation(if he has enough time) and compare 2 impelementations next time and decide to merge one of them 14:15:36 qwebirc69545: added to todo-review-list 14:15:55 andreykurilin: thank you! 14:16:21 okay I'll try to propose some improvements 14:16:27 andreykurilin, amaretskiy could some one dociments in commit msg target schema of implementation. I remember we talked about 5 classes schema 14:16:28 nice 14:16:31 but I forgot it( 14:16:44 ok 14:16:48 I'll document it 14:17:37 Great it will speed up my review 14:18:30 amaretskiy: I'll separate my impelementation from your patch and will document proposed solutions. Also will wait for your impelementation. Maybe we will find compromise :) 14:18:42 #topic barbican 14:18:48 qwebirc69545: ping:) 14:18:54 yes :) 14:19:06 so can you propose a new job to experimental queue ? 14:19:19 it will simplify review process 14:19:39 I can find examples for you 14:19:53 andreykurilin: Sure. I'll do it. I'll also upload a patch with rally-cover errors resolved, soon 14:20:05 can you point me to some, please? 14:20:31 sure 14:20:36 one sec 14:21:35 qwebirc69545: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333860/ 14:21:52 @andreykurilin can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337115 14:22:08 andreykurilin: thanks! I'll upload, soon. 14:22:38 kavithas, I'm reviewing it now 14:22:51 Please wait a bit it hard topic 14:23:07 ok.. thanks.. please let me know your comments 14:23:35 kavithas: sure, it is already in my todo-review list 14:23:44 kavithas, I'll ping you by mail immediate 14:23:55 ok.. thank you both of you :) 14:24:02 any other topics to discuss? 14:24:20 Nothing from me 14:24:28 nothing from me 14:25:03 thanks everyone for participation 14:25:04 bye 14:25:08 #endmeeting