14:02:10 <andreykurilin> #startmeeting Rally
14:02:11 <astudenov> hi
14:02:12 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Jan 16 14:02:10 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is andreykurilin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:02:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:02:15 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'rally'
14:02:24 <andreykurilin> hi everyone!
14:04:51 <andreykurilin> I added one topic to agenda of this meeting
14:05:04 <andreykurilin> #topic Rally 0.8.0. Are we ready?
14:05:22 <andreykurilin> we don't have releases for a long time
14:05:39 <andreykurilin> and it is time to make it
14:05:50 <andreykurilin> redesign of verification component is almost finish
14:06:00 <andreykurilin> we need just to add some docs for it
14:06:09 <andreykurilin> I expect to finish it this week
14:06:14 <andreykurilin> Any known blockers?
14:07:28 <andreykurilin> I'm alone here?(
14:07:31 <astudenov> tags for verifications?
14:07:58 <andreykurilin> not sure that it is blocker
14:08:01 <andreykurilin> just noce to have
14:08:03 <andreykurilin> *nice
14:08:45 <astudenov> ok. then nothing from my side
14:09:24 <andreykurilin> I expect that we missed some bugs while redesign verification component, so I plan next release in 2 weeks after 0.8.0 :)
14:09:47 <andreykurilin> all such nice-to-have features will be done there
14:10:11 <andreykurilin> they are not blockers and we already spend too much time for 0.8.0 release
14:10:42 <andreykurilin> it contains too much features and writing release notes for it can become real pain
14:12:06 <andreykurilin> accept docs fro verification component, we should merge docs for hooks. it is another thing which is blocker
14:13:22 <astudenov> lets review docs for hooks
14:13:26 <andreykurilin> yes:)
14:14:10 <andreykurilin> Documentary is very important. we need to note all missed parts of rally
14:14:40 <andreykurilin> hooks were introduced several months ago and do not have merged docs yet:(
14:15:18 <andreykurilin> ok. so docs for verification and hooks are only two blockers for 0.8.0
14:15:31 <andreykurilin> it is really nice to hear that we do not have a lot of blockers
14:16:16 <andreykurilin> ok. so I hope next week we will discuss new release of Rally and plan features for the next release
14:16:30 <andreykurilin> #topic Open discussions
14:16:39 <andreykurilin> actually I do not have more topics to discuss
14:17:12 <hai-shi> hi, andreykurilin
14:17:18 <andreykurilin> hi hai-shi
14:17:19 <hai-shi> I have a question
14:17:22 <andreykurilin> cool
14:17:42 <hai-shi> our team hope me to test neutron
14:17:52 <hai-shi> not based the api
14:18:05 <hai-shi> but the osclient can not resolve it
14:18:10 <hai-shi> :(
14:18:12 <andreykurilin> hm
14:18:22 <andreykurilin> what kind of tests you are interested on?
14:18:44 <hai-shi> our team hope to test the rabbitmq
14:19:04 <hai-shi> and send the fake request to rabbitmq
14:19:20 <hai-shi> but I can not finish it by rally
14:19:39 <andreykurilin> hai-shi: hm... I heard that someone has own rally plugin for testing rabbitmq
14:19:55 <andreykurilin> let me try to figure out who it was and try to ping he or she
14:20:19 <andreykurilin> PS: What is blockers for you while writing such scenario by your-self?
14:20:23 <hai-shi> ok, could we add some plan about it in rally:)
14:21:29 <andreykurilin> hai-shi: so I'm ok about adding scenario which uses not only openstack clients
14:21:54 <hai-shi> ok.
14:22:05 <andreykurilin> even more, I expect that in several months we finish validation refactoring and will be able to write scenarios not only for openstack
14:22:06 <hai-shi> and question 2. in rally 0.7.0
14:22:22 <hai-shi> we usually got failed task
14:23:05 <hai-shi> when the task is failed, we could not get the right report
14:23:12 <andreykurilin> O_o
14:23:41 <andreykurilin> can you share json&report of such task? it is hard to say anything. I need to see it and try to debug
14:24:05 <hai-shi> it is our env's problem
14:24:30 <andreykurilin> but rally should construct report in any case
14:24:40 <hai-shi> could i add some time label to the report
14:24:44 <hai-shi> ?
14:25:48 <andreykurilin> what kind of time label you are interested? something like when task was launched?
14:26:25 <hai-shi> some thing like it:)
14:28:33 <andreykurilin> so, I'm ok about such extension
14:28:50 <andreykurilin> I think we should rework a bit overview tab of our report
14:29:38 <hai-shi> got it. question 3)I hope we could count the sla by time(such as: a month, half year and so on) but this character should depend raas
14:30:36 <hai-shi> sla's passing rate or fail rate:)
14:30:47 <andreykurilin> not sure that I understand you
14:32:52 <hai-shi> hm, when we run rally to test, i hope we could get the number of failure tests by time
14:33:07 <hai-shi> I'm not sure that i explain it clearly
14:33:59 <andreykurilin> you mean run long task with several scenarios and then get who many failed iterations were at particular time?
14:34:30 <hai-shi> yeap:)
14:35:37 <andreykurilin> I think it is more like post-parsing things. It can be added when we work on some "rally portal" while working on raas, but now it sounds like separate thing
14:37:15 <hai-shi> why?
14:39:12 <andreykurilin> ok, I think we can put such frame in our report. but it requires a lot of work with js and out current js guru moved to another initiative and have no enough time for Rally
14:40:12 <hai-shi> :( got it.
14:41:28 <andreykurilin> we should try to find another guy
14:41:43 <andreykurilin> involve more contributors
14:41:44 <andreykurilin> eh...
14:41:49 <andreykurilin> ok. anything else?
14:42:05 <hai-shi> question 4)compatiable with win or linux
14:42:19 <hai-shi> i am not sure the question
14:42:28 <hai-shi> that's all.
14:43:05 <andreykurilin> ok, rally is compatible with linux:)
14:43:11 <andreykurilin> we have ubuntu and centos gates
14:43:13 <andreykurilin> :)
14:43:51 <hai-shi> in fact, i hope i could run rally in win too.
14:44:08 <hai-shi> thanks, andrey :)
14:44:13 <andreykurilin> here can be a lot of problems. not related to rally at all, but openstack clients
14:45:06 <andreykurilin> last week I got windows vm to check compatibility and try to identify most critical issues and understand the possibility of running rally in windows, but unfortunately I had not time.
14:45:20 <andreykurilin> After releasing 0.8.0 I'll have more time for that investigation
14:46:09 <hai-shi> got it. thanks a million
14:46:49 <astudenov> hai-shi: it is easier to setup an virtualbox vm with ubuntu for running rally
14:47:48 <hai-shi> astudenov: yeap. you are right. But in some time, we need win to run some software:(
14:48:50 <andreykurilin> anything else to discuss?
14:49:05 <astarove> no
14:49:09 <hai-shi> no
14:49:59 <andreykurilin> ok. thanks for participation
14:50:22 <andreykurilin> see you at #openstack-rally (irc) and http://gitter.im/rally-dev/Lobby
14:50:26 <andreykurilin> #endmeeting