13:38:11 <msdubov_> #startmeeting RallyRelease 13:38:12 <openstack> Meeting started Wed May 6 13:38:11 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is msdubov_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:38:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:38:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'rallyrelease' 13:38:17 <msdubov_> So let's start 13:38:29 <msdubov_> #topic Release 0.0.4 13:39:24 <msdubov_> First, there is the first version of release notes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180498 13:39:46 <msdubov_> redixin, amaretskiy, andreykurilin, yfried Has anyone except for boris-42 seen it? Any further comments? 13:39:58 <yfried> msdubov_: why not start with the new dashboard? 13:40:05 <amaretskiy> I will review this soon 13:40:29 <andreykurilin> msdubov_: I started review it, but don't finish yet:) 13:40:47 <msdubov_> amaretskiy, andreykurilin Thanks! 13:41:02 <msdubov_> yfried, We will discuss it, but release notes and release 0.0.4 are a kind of urgent things 13:41:22 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/rally: [Clients] Add classmethod osclients.Clients.register https://review.openstack.org/177884 13:44:33 <msdubov_> amaretskiy, andreykurilin, yfried, boris-42, redixin And let me remind you one more time that we still hope to have the following three patches in our 0.0.4 release: 13:44:36 <msdubov_> First, murano stuff 13:44:40 <msdubov_> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137650/ 13:44:45 <msdubov_> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171625/ 13:44:50 <msdubov_> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162418/ 13:45:04 <msdubov_> And also the installation script ^ 13:45:11 <msdubov_> So please pay the most attention to them now. 13:45:20 <msdubov_> amaretskiy, andreykurilin yfried boris-42 redixin Any questions? 13:45:43 <amaretskiy> no questions 13:45:52 <amaretskiy> ok 13:45:58 <redixin> i have a question 13:46:04 <yfried> msdubov_: I have issues with installation script 13:46:13 <yfried> msdubov_: I was unable to review latest patchset 13:46:27 <yfried> msdubov_: but I have concerns with changing default behavior 13:46:31 <msdubov_> redixin Is now responsible for that script 13:46:52 <yfried> redixin: I didn't see and answer to my concerns 13:47:18 <redixin> we can finish install.sh but without removing psycopg2 from requirements 13:47:23 <yfried> redixin: making "venv" installation implicit is both a change of behavior and a bad idea 13:47:52 <msdubov_> yfried, redixin Can we maybe discuss the details later here, after the meeting finishes? We have very little time actually 13:48:04 <redixin> is installing system-wide by default if root 13:48:16 <redixin> and installing venv if non-root 13:48:31 <yfried> redixin: msdubov_ ok 13:48:41 <yfried> redixin: let's discuss this later. 13:48:41 <msdubov_> #topic Release 0.0.5 13:49:16 <msdubov_> amaretskiy, andreykurilin redixin boris-42 yfried I'd like to ask you to propose patches "critical" for the next release, namely 0.0.5 13:49:31 <msdubov_> I'll collect them then in our release doc 13:49:40 <msdubov_> #link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TX5zpYcTX8AXm-K_h1lzUNVCMvbRgsjUKU-dEYNWLY8/edit 13:49:49 <amaretskiy> I propose patches related to reports 13:50:30 <yfried> msdubov_: not sure what critical means 13:50:36 <amaretskiy> oh, they already there 13:50:49 <msdubov_> amaretskiy, Seems like already there :) 13:50:53 <rvasilets_> [Swift] Add objects context class? 13:51:19 <rvasilets_> Rally verify support for any in-tree Openstack project functional tests& 13:51:48 <msdubov_> yfried, "Critical" means that we really want to have them in the release 0.0.5, without these patches a release will make little sense 13:51:48 <msdubov_> yfried, so "critical" patches should be reviewed asap 13:52:16 <redixin> yfried, maybe it is "patches that someone waiting and suffering" =))) 13:52:29 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, yep, thanks, we already had some swift stuff in 0.0.4, so let's continue having it as top priority for 0.0.5 13:52:54 <redixin> what about murano? 13:52:57 <rvasilets_> also I think we don't merge murano bench) 13:53:33 <yfried> msdubov_: redixin: ack 13:53:42 <msdubov_> redixin, rvasilets_ That would be sad :( 13:53:58 <rvasilets_> yes 13:54:29 <msdubov_> Actually the same about plugin base because boris-42 said we should have 0.0.4 without it... 13:54:30 <andreykurilin> msdubov_: I want to see removement of psycong2 package from requirements in 0.0.5. Also, it would be nice if installation script will be able to install packages based on selected db backend 13:54:39 <rvasilets_> Maybe some plugins patches? 13:55:02 <msdubov_> andreykurilin, thanks, agreed 13:55:27 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, So swift/murano benchmarks are already plugins? 13:55:33 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, What do you mean? 13:56:02 <rvasilets_> Boris patches about plugins 13:56:15 <rvasilets_> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150647/ 13:56:23 <rvasilets_> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160142/ 13:56:59 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, Yes, boris-42 said he wouldn't be able to update them very quickly, so we should have 0.0.4 without it 13:57:23 <msdubov_> Okay, thanks for all this information, I will put it to the doc later 13:57:28 <msdubov_> Now the last topic 13:57:36 <msdubov_> #topic Rally dashboard 13:57:46 <msdubov_> #link goo.gl/04aT6p 13:57:54 <msdubov_> Many thanks to rvasilets_ for this nice dashboard 13:58:28 <msdubov_> yfried, So you can see the list of patches "Critical for next release" there 13:58:42 <msdubov_> They are for now actually just the patches starred by boris-42 and me 13:59:02 <yfried> msdubov_: yeah. I'm already using it. it's a great tool 13:59:12 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, I just have one question, what is "Important patches"? How do we define them? 13:59:53 <rvasilets_> As I remember its patches starred by you or boris 14:00:09 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, Ok, clear 14:00:23 <yfried> rvasilets_: msdubov_: boris set them to "stared by core team" 14:00:31 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, But I dislike the idea a bit, what about patches starred by other cores?.. 14:00:37 <msdubov_> yfried, Ah ok 14:00:47 <yfried> msdubov_: "stared by msdubov_" means release-patches 14:01:05 <rvasilets_> msdubov_, it was like so first. But Boris ask me to do like now 14:01:13 <msdubov_> yfried, release patches are those stared by both me and boris-42 14:01:35 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, So I personally think the opinion of all the cores should be reflected in this dashboard 14:01:43 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, So let's discuss that with boris-42 14:01:48 <rvasilets_> Ok 14:02:32 <yfried> msdubov_: ^ any core can make patch important. only msdubov_+ boris-42 can make it "release critical " AFAIK 14:03:20 <rvasilets_> In other projects is so. ^ any core can make patch important. 14:03:27 <rvasilets_> As I saw 14:03:44 <rvasilets_> *its 14:04:42 <redixin> important == starred? 14:05:51 <msdubov_> redixin, as far as I have understood yes 14:06:57 <redixin> Critical+for+next+release=%28starredby%3A%22mdubov%40mirantis.com%22+AND+starredby%3A%22boris%40pavlovic.me%22%29 14:07:01 <redixin> i see 14:07:16 <rvasilets_> starred means to push star under title of commit message 14:07:39 <rvasilets_> ) 14:08:24 <openstackgerrit> Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: get subunit output https://review.openstack.org/180556 14:08:25 <openstackgerrit> Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script https://review.openstack.org/162418 14:08:42 <redixin> ^ I just added --system/-s for backward compat 14:09:04 <yingjun> how about add ‘Your are a reviewer, but haven't voted in the current revision’ like this url do: http://dwz.cn/IQklE 14:09:53 <msdubov_> yingjun, I think that would be a nice thing to add! 14:09:56 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, ^ 14:10:06 <redixin> +1 14:10:10 <yfried> +1 14:10:26 <msdubov_> rvasilets_, Please add that! 14:10:35 <msdubov_> #action Add �Your are a reviewer, but haven't voted in the current revision� to Rally dashboart 14:10:45 <msdubov_> Okay guys let's finish the meeting 14:10:47 <msdubov_> #endmeeting