14:04:49 #startmeeting RDO meeting - 2022-10-26 14:04:49 Meeting started Wed Oct 26 14:04:49 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is amoralej. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:04:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:04:50 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting___2022_10_26' 14:05:01 #chair jcapitao[m] 14:05:01 Current chairs: amoralej jcapitao[m] 14:05:08 o/ 14:05:14 #chair karolinku[m] 14:05:14 Current chairs: amoralej jcapitao[m] karolinku[m] 14:05:56 let's start thee first topic 14:06:02 feel free to add more 14:06:24 #topic Update about zed 14:06:54 #link https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RDO-38 14:07:19 #info Zed GA builds for non-TripleO packages are being pushed to mirrors http://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/9-stream/cloud/x86_64/openstack-zed/ 14:07:31 #info Zed GA builds for non-TripleO packages are being pushed to mirrors http://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/9-stream/cloud/x86_64/openstack-zed/ 14:08:09 #info tempest plugins are being unpinned for master 14:08:21 jcapitao[m], ^ this is what you meant, right? 14:08:49 yes sorry for master 14:09:09 I'll unpin non-os puppet modules as well 14:09:34 once the GA builds are pushed to mirror, we'll build the centos-release-openstack-zed RPM 14:10:11 I mean we'll ask for CentOS team to build and push it in extras repo 14:10:29 actually, we can do it 14:10:43 now we can build and push to the extras-common, right? 14:11:04 we don't depend on centos infra team anymore for release rpms 14:11:18 lemme double check, in case i'm confused 14:11:52 ah 14:11:53 https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=38942 14:12:09 https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=38942 14:12:12 yep, that 14:12:25 since cs9, we can manage them by ourselves 14:12:34 ok, I've never done it 14:12:44 it's just as any other cbs build 14:12:51 so we can push to extras tag 14:12:57 if we are part of a SIG ? 14:12:59 but just using extras9s-extras-common-* tags 14:13:46 i'm not sure if every sig member have access to it or just a group of representatives from each dfg 14:13:49 lemme check 14:15:03 yes, i think it's one per SIG 14:15:07 or something like that 14:15:11 i'm in :) 14:15:13 Merged rdo-jobs master: Remove fs1 ovb and image build jobs from wallaby centos8 line https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/45831 14:16:31 https://accounts.centos.org/group/sig-extras/ 14:16:51 i've started reviewing https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/zed-release-announcement btw 14:17:12 feel free to review and edit 14:17:14 ook 14:18:40 also, I created the US https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RDO-38 14:19:03 ans sub tasks with description explaining the step 14:19:10 with some examples etc 14:19:28 if you can review the description 14:19:32 ok, good, so this is the new checklist 14:19:48 can this be used as a template for next ones? 14:19:52 yeah, for next release we'll just have to clone the ticket 14:19:57 you know if can be cloned? 14:19:57 yeah exactly 14:19:59 ah, good 14:21:10 trello checklist were more lightweight , but i guess we'll have to handle with jira 14:21:13 so good 14:21:41 maybe creating a task for tripleo packages? 14:22:08 given that it's usually a trailing task after initial promotin 14:22:17 yeah, in fact I'm creating the sub-tasks when realizing the task 14:22:38 good 14:22:38 so the OOO sub tasks will come in a few days 14:22:43 so we create it as we go 14:22:57 i understand subtasks are created empty when we clone it, right? 14:24:14 we should give a try 14:25:15 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RDO-63 14:25:48 it's a clone 14:25:52 it works ! 14:26:20 yep 14:26:24 but now I cannot remove them O:) 14:26:26 and subtasks are empty, so good 14:26:40 so, we have antelope preparation ticket? xD 14:26:41 do you have admin authorization ? 14:27:03 ah we could keep it indeed 14:27:23 better to remove it 14:27:26 if possible 14:27:32 i see an option to Archive it 14:27:39 no remove it 14:28:14 so you're admin I guess 14:28:20 as I can't see it 14:28:50 i can see it only in the initial story, not in subtasks 14:29:02 but i assume if i archive the story, all subtasks will also be archived 14:29:03 ... 14:30:32 can you test it ? 14:31:47 "Issue RDO-63 will be archived with 16 sub-tasks. After you archive this issue it will disappear from search results, the list of issues in projects, the dashboard, and reports. It will also be removed from Scrum and Kanban boards and backlog." 14:31:52 doint it 14:32:15 done 14:33:04 good 14:33:16 the process is validated :) 14:33:48 yep :) 14:34:04 so, bye bye trello for antelope 14:34:54 after many years of loyal service 14:34:55 anything else for this topic? 14:35:06 nope that's all 14:35:23 moving to next one 14:35:42 #topic Status update for RDO Trunk centos9-master-head builder 14:35:51 karolinku[m], ^ 14:35:59 i think we have some progress for it 14:37:01 #info All FTBFS have been fixed and centos9-master-head is in consistent status now 14:37:18 yep 14:37:29 \o/ 14:37:33 I will add centos9-master-head to ftbfs dashboard 14:38:30 #action karolinku[m] will add centos9-master-head to the report-ftbfs dashboard 14:38:41 ok, so that's finished 14:40:05 #topic Published update of rdopkg 14:40:56 #info rdopkg 0.15.1 release has been published with new features as --extra-repo option in clone action or information about releashe phase 14:41:34 it's 1.5.1 IIRC 14:41:51 #undo 14:41:51 Removing item from minutes: #info rdopkg 0.15.1 release has been published with new features as --extra-repo option in clone action or information about releashe phase 14:42:03 #info rdopkg 1.5.1 release has been published with new features as --extra-repo option in clone action or information about releashe phase 14:42:04 right 14:42:20 nice, i see you built it in fedora already 14:42:41 #info packages are available in epel9, and fedora 37 and 38 14:42:54 yes 14:42:59 maybe we could backpurt up to 35? (it's what i use :) 14:43:01 well it's in pending repos 14:43:14 yeah, it will end up in release soon i guess 14:44:04 or maybe we should update our Fedora systems :P 14:44:17 nah 14:44:19 lol 14:44:28 I'm running F35 as well x) 14:44:59 tbh, fedora upgrade process in last releases have worked like a charm 14:45:07 so it's probably good to update to 37 14:45:46 I'll give a try this WE 14:45:55 btw I noted your comment on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/gating_scripts/+/45644/6/buildsys-tags/validate_updates.sh 14:46:08 about the rdopkg release status:development 14:47:27 yep 14:48:34 the "status: development" may be any filter 14:48:42 based on releases keys 14:49:46 Ananya Banerjee proposed rdo-jobs master: Defines and adds sc10 kvm train to integration line https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/45824 14:49:50 although i think probably the only that makes sense is to search based on status 14:50:52 Ananya Banerjee created rdo-jobs master: Defines and adds sc10 kvm train to integration line https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/45848 14:51:07 what if we add new metadata attribute ? 14:51:12 wdym 14:51:48 I meant if there is a new attribute in the future 14:51:56 ah, that's what i mean 14:51:57 like status 14:52:02 to be able to look for anything 14:52:07 not specifically tied to status 14:52:14 as we have for rdopkg info 14:52:22 yeah 14:52:25 Ananya Banerjee proposed rdo-jobs master: Defines and adds sc10 kvm train to integration line https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/45848 14:52:27 +1 for the feature 14:52:28 we can do rdopkg info name:openstack-nova 14:52:33 I'll work on it 14:52:35 or upstream:xxxxx 14:52:43 or any attribute 14:53:16 actually, iirc in rdopkg info if we add more that one, it will filter with both 14:53:48 #topic open floor 14:53:57 who wants to chair next week? 14:54:07 it'v video mtg, btw 14:54:35 I might not be available next week 14:54:48 I'll will also be on PTO 14:55:08 oh, it will be just me and maybe spotz then :) 14:55:17 #action amoralej will chair next week 14:55:37 we still have 5 minutes 14:55:43 anything else you'd like to discuss? 14:57:40 nothing else from my side 14:58:03 nothing from me also 14:58:20 ok, i'm closing the meeting then 14:58:27 thanks both for joining 14:58:32 #endmeeting