14:01:30 <karolinku[m]> #startmeeting RDO meeting - 2024-04-10 14:01:30 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Apr 10 14:01:30 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is karolinku[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:30 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:30 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting___2024_04_10' 14:01:35 <amoralej> o/ 14:02:04 <karolinku[m]> #chair amoralej spotz 14:02:04 <opendevmeet> Warning: Nick not in channel: spotz 14:02:04 <opendevmeet> Current chairs: amoralej karolinku[m] spotz 14:02:16 <rdogerrit> Joel Capitao proposed config master: Remove validate-dependencies-rebuilds and rebuild-fedora-dependencies https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/52777 14:02:37 <jcapitao[m]> o/ 14:02:49 <karolinku[m]> #chair jcapitao 14:02:49 <opendevmeet> Current chairs: amoralej jcapitao karolinku[m] spotz 14:05:13 <karolinku[m]> #topic RDO Caracal 2024.1 preparation 14:07:39 <jcapitao[m]> there is no updates since last week 14:07:55 <jcapitao[m]> we built the final releases 14:08:12 <spotz[m]> woohoo? 14:08:38 <karolinku[m]> #info final releases are built 14:08:58 <jcapitao[m]> we promoted them very them recently https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/52774 14:10:01 <jcapitao[m]> but we are waiting for the puppet module to be released in order to be able to promote GA build in -release tag 14:10:15 <spotz[m]> So what are we looking at timeline wise? 14:10:43 <jcapitao[m]> hopefully end of next week I'd say 14:10:46 <amoralej> tkajinam ^ any expected timeline for puppet modules Caracal release ? 14:11:15 <tkajinam> I'll proposed a release this week. am still waiting for a few patches and have been packed by PTG session, sorry 14:11:24 <spotz[m]> Nice! 14:11:30 <amoralej> thanks tkajinam++ ! 14:12:02 <jcapitao[m]> no worries thanks 14:13:13 <jcapitao[m]> amoralej: wrt https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RDO-232 - the tagging operation in extras9s-extras-common-testing is done manually by an authenticated and authorized cloudsig user right ? 14:13:44 <amoralej> yes 14:15:23 <jcapitao[m]> mmh I should try then (once repo populated ofc) 14:15:39 <jcapitao[m]> IIRC last time I tried but didn't work 14:17:27 <amoralej> mmm we should be able to find group members 14:17:50 <jcapitao[m]> https://accounts.centos.org/group/sig-cloud/ ? 14:18:46 <amoralej> that's for cloudsig, i mean for extras repo 14:19:04 <amoralej> there is a specific group for the users that can build and tag in extras tags 14:19:07 <spotz[m]> There's also OKD and other folks in there don't forget 14:19:28 <amoralej> they wanted to have one person per sig, i think 14:19:45 <amoralej> note that any build in those tags are added by default to all centos servers 14:20:17 <amoralej> https://accounts.centos.org/group/sig-extras/ 14:20:17 <spotz[m]> 1 admin yes though we have 2 + me 14:20:59 <amoralej> if you want, jcapitao as chair can replace me 14:21:07 <jcapitao[m]> ah okk that's why 14:21:21 <jcapitao[m]> no it's ok as it is now 14:21:23 <amoralej> lorbus is also there 14:21:49 <spotz[m]> We should have elections, we've been doing those in March the last 2 years 14:22:10 <amoralej> oh, two years already! 14:22:19 <amoralej> time run fast 14:22:26 <jcapitao[m]> I'll build the centos-release-openstack-caracal RPM and let you tag it in extras tag 14:22:54 <jcapitao[m]> yeah definitely .. 14:22:57 <spotz[m]> I giess this will be the third one since we cleaned up and rebooted the SiG 14:25:29 <karolinku[m]> is that all in this topic? 14:25:55 <jcapitao[m]> I think so yes 14:26:40 <spotz[m]> Just a reminder as we get closer to the release the announcement needs to be completed 14:27:16 <karolinku[m]> contrubutor list? or just review? 14:28:00 <amoralej> i'd say both 14:28:08 <amoralej> content and contributor lists 14:28:30 <spotz[m]> Contributor lists, the highlights section and review. I can grab the general highlights but if there's things special for our release we want to mention we have that part 14:28:39 <amoralej> we need to add something about the inactive projects we have retired 14:28:57 <spotz[m]> Last I checked the general highlights weren't updated as it was way before release 14:30:12 <spotz[m]> Probably grab 1 or 2 from cinder, glance, keystone, nova, neutron, manila, and both the horizon ones 14:32:20 <karolinku[m]> #topic How to handle CentOS stream 8 EOL 14:32:33 <karolinku[m]> #link https://blog.centos.org/2023/04/end-dates-are-coming-for-centos-stream-8-and-centos-linux-7/ 14:33:43 <amoralej> so, i CentOS Stream is going EOL in end of may 14:34:26 <amoralej> my current question is, specifically, about RDO Trunk repos for wallaby, xena and yoga in CentOS 8 14:35:08 <amoralej> my intention is to remove them by that date 14:35:23 <amoralej> and leave only CS9 ones 14:36:56 <karolinku[m]> what else can we do? 14:37:01 <jcapitao[m]> +1 14:37:05 <karolinku[m]> keep EOL builds? 14:37:09 <amoralej> we could yes 14:37:20 <amoralej> keep the repos available in the server for some time 14:37:28 <amoralej> with latest status 14:37:41 <jcapitao[m]> I think we should announce now in ML 14:37:53 <amoralej> yes 14:37:54 <karolinku[m]> I would vote for removing 14:38:01 <jcapitao[m]> I mean the whole timeline 14:38:31 <amoralej> so that users who are willing to keep using them have time to copy it locally 14:38:45 <jcapitao[m]> to avoid the situation we had with C7 and let the community time to organize/anticipate 14:38:53 <jcapitao[m]> yes exactly 14:39:05 <amoralej> well, for that we also announced it with time ... :) 14:39:17 <amoralej> but yeah, let's do our part 14:39:44 <jcapitao[m]> right 14:39:54 <jcapitao[m]> let me check the notice period we gave 14:40:21 <spotz[m]> Just be prepared to have to keep something around or reinstated like last time 14:40:32 <karolinku[m]> #info we will inform on ML about date of Centos8 repos removal 14:41:02 <karolinku[m]> #undo 14:41:02 <opendevmeet> Removing item from minutes: #info we will inform on ML about date of Centos8 repos removal 14:41:59 <karolinku[m]> #info RDO Trunk repos for wallaby, xena and yoga on CentOS 8 will be removed due to EOL. There will be anouncement on mailing list about exact time. 14:42:27 <amoralej> actually, I'd like to stop the centos8 builders slightly before, one week or so 14:42:47 <amoralej> note that those three are in unmaintained status 14:43:46 <jcapitao[m]> we gave 8 weeks period notice for C7 which was pretty good 14:45:29 <jcapitao[m]> right, so not a big deal to stop before then 14:45:31 <amoralej> yep, i think it'd be good to announce this asap 14:46:16 <jcapitao[m]> dunno if there is that much activity in unmaintained branches 14:48:09 <jcapitao[m]> https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:unmaintained/wallaby+status:merged+-owner:infra-root@openstack.org 14:48:17 <jcapitao[m]> https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:unmaintained/xena+status:merged+-owner:infra-root@openstack.org 14:48:24 <jcapitao[m]> not that much 14:48:49 <amoralej> https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:unmaintained/yoga+status:merged 14:49:07 <spotz[m]> There shouldn't be, so we should be able to shut the builds early 14:49:08 <jcapitao[m]> yeah I was looking at yoga 14:49:13 <jcapitao[m]> there are much more patches 14:49:30 <amoralej> probably less in two months ... 14:50:22 <karolinku[m]> #topic open floor 14:50:43 <karolinku[m]> next RDO Guard is karolinku 14:50:55 <karolinku[m]> who wants to chair next week? 14:52:21 <amoralej> i can take it 14:52:40 <karolinku[m]> #action amoralej is chairing next week 14:53:44 <karolinku[m]> do we have anything else to discuss? 14:54:58 <amoralej> who will do the announcement for centos EOL ? 14:55:06 <karolinku[m]> I can 14:55:44 <amoralej> thanks karolinku[m] ! 14:56:55 <karolinku[m]> #endmeeting