19:00:21 <davidlenwell> #startmeeting refstack
19:00:22 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Apr 20 19:00:21 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is davidlenwell. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:00:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack'
19:00:26 <catherineD> o/
19:00:52 <davidlenwell> Today's agenda: 1) Recap last week agreements 2) Use case for signed request  3) Refstack Wiki update 4) Refstack UI status and review 5) pending review 6) open discussion
19:00:57 <hogepodge> o/
19:01:14 <pvaneck> o/
19:02:15 <catherineD> Last week we agreed to update refstack-client to SHA 7c8fcc67.
19:02:31 <davidlenwell> #topic 1) Recap last week agreements
19:02:49 <sslypushenko__> o/
19:03:35 <catherineD> Last week we agreed to update refstack-client to SHA 7c8fcc67. ... sslypushenko__: had submitted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173090/  which had been merged.
19:03:51 <davidlenwell> awesome
19:03:54 <vladiskuz|2> o/
19:05:06 <davidlenwell> any other agreements?
19:05:16 <catherineD> We also discussed where to host Refstack server
19:05:34 <catherineD> From last week's meeting, Rocky will contact infra team for a heads up that Refstack team investigating the possibility to push  a patch to host Refstack server at infra.
19:06:25 <davidlenwell> I can follow up on that
19:07:06 <catherineD> great so we will revisit this topic next week?
19:07:11 <davidlenwell> sure
19:08:00 <sslypushenko__> Sounds good!
19:08:07 <davidlenwell> okay .. anything else?
19:08:13 <catherineD> also last week we deferred "design session planning" to this week ... but I still do not see any entry
19:08:33 <catherineD> #link  https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=134&v=_zgbXbnuRNM
19:08:46 <catherineD> sorry wrong one
19:09:11 <davidlenwell> catherineD's youtube debute
19:09:14 <catherineD> wrong link :-)
19:09:36 <catherineD> I meant to get the eitherpad link
19:09:44 <hogepodge> I don't know anything about wrong links. :-D
19:10:05 <pvaneck> lol
19:10:20 <catherineD> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-qa-vancouver-design-session
19:11:29 <davidlenwell> As much as I'd like to take up time on the schedule durring the summit for refstack.. we haven't had the cycles to prepair ..
19:11:47 <davidlenwell> I'd like us to be discussing the ui
19:12:00 <sslypushenko__> +1
19:13:14 <davidlenwell> since we aren't prepped to talk about it now.. we must defer
19:13:23 <catherineD> ok
19:13:31 <davidlenwell> lets move on..
19:13:32 <catherineD> that is all from last week
19:13:36 <davidlenwell> #topic 2) Use case for signed request
19:14:21 <davidlenwell> I thought we discussed this last week?
19:14:34 <pvaneck> last wednesday
19:14:36 <davidlenwell> are there any outstanding questions about the reasoning behind this change?
19:15:14 <catherineD> For those who did not attend last week Wed IRC meeting sslypushenko__: has very nice document at
19:15:25 <catherineD> #link https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1v7exKKL1zSA102Xu8FkY1u9rMVUE6BjwUCoWGYYvbaI/edit#slide=id.g3005a843b_0_11
19:16:33 <sslypushenko__> I started discussion about this document in openstack-infra. If anybody has some ideas, you can shared it there
19:16:39 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: may I request you to add the data upload workflow in #link https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1y76mYyFl-iOqH4OQYT27Xcyh9QSPatXkuSag4zdHr5w/edit to the above link so we have all in on doc ..
19:17:36 <sslypushenko__> catherineD I think that upload is not a specific case, but I can add it here
19:18:08 <davidlenwell> I don't think this is still an outstanding issue.. lets move on for now
19:18:33 <davidlenwell> #topic 4) Refstack UI status and review
19:18:35 <catherineD> davidlenwell: ok ... I can talk with sslypushenko__: on #refstack later ..
19:18:44 <davidlenwell> this topic is going to be more time consuming I believe
19:19:07 <sslypushenko__> catherineD agreed
19:19:30 <davidlenwell> pvaneck: can you walk us through your status on the ui prototype?
19:19:47 <pvaneck> sure
19:20:21 <pvaneck> currently I have a results page that essentially just has a paginated table, showing the list of results
19:20:48 <pvaneck> CPID, Upload Date, Test ID
19:20:55 <pvaneck> Can filter by cpid
19:21:17 <pvaneck> clicking on the test id will lead to a test output page
19:21:40 <davidlenwell> awesome!
19:21:41 <pvaneck> the API needs the CORS patch in order for the UI to be able to retrieve data from the api
19:21:56 <davidlenwell> I'm reviewing that now
19:21:58 <sslypushenko__> Sounds great!
19:22:26 <pvaneck> the patch is currently under review with sslypushenko__ already +2ing it
19:23:15 <sslypushenko__> It is LGTM, davidlenwell or catherineD can merge it
19:23:25 <davidlenwell> okay
19:23:34 <davidlenwell> I was still looking at it when the meeting started
19:23:55 <davidlenwell> when we're done I'll merge if its right
19:24:31 <pvaneck> so just to clarify, it is fine to show the cpid in the list of all submitted test results?
19:24:36 <catherineD> so once pvaneck: pushes the next patch ...  The refstack server UI is ready (without auth)
19:25:13 <davidlenwell> auth should be a high priority now that we have the basic framework in place
19:25:53 <catherineD> pvaneck: the reason for not showing the cpid is because we want the data to be anomymous ?
19:26:01 <davidlenwell> and we need to revisit the ux for assosiating users with vendors
19:26:01 <sslypushenko__> pvaneck It is a good question about cpid. May be we shouldn't display cpid as shared data?
19:26:29 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: exactly ...
19:26:46 <catherineD> cpod should only show with auth ...
19:26:57 <sslypushenko__> I think that for now it is ok. But we should think about it
19:27:15 <catherineD> so do we agree to show or not to show the cpid?
19:27:34 <davidlenwell> with no auth.. don't show it
19:27:51 <sslypushenko__> It is reasonable... +!
19:27:53 <davidlenwell> once we werk out a registration flow and vendor assosiation we can revisit that
19:27:59 <sslypushenko__> +1
19:28:00 <catherineD> #agreed do not show cpid without auth
19:28:04 <pvaneck> okay
19:29:21 <catherineD> #agreed David to follow up with infra team on the possibility for Refstack server hosting at infra
19:29:29 <davidlenwell> I'd like to plan a ui design session with our group.. either at the summit or sometime face to face in the bay area
19:29:40 <catherineD> davidlenwell: +1
19:29:55 <davidlenwell> more of us will be at the summit..
19:30:11 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: vladiskuz|2: we will have voice and video this time ...
19:30:42 <sslypushenko__> catherineD Thx!
19:30:43 <catherineD> davidlenwell: not sure how the facility is at the summit ...
19:30:56 <vladiskuz|2> catherineD: great!
19:31:13 <davidlenwell> akanda has an air bnb two blocks from the venue we can use if need be
19:32:04 <catherineD> ha that is the company name ... Rocky asked ..
19:32:08 <catherineD> davidlenwell: +1
19:32:40 <davidlenwell> it was all over twitter last week.. I think she follows me
19:33:26 <catherineD> davidlenwell: if we are done on this topic ... we should revisit #3 ...
19:33:51 <davidlenwell> #agreed we will find a time to set aside at the summit to discuss the api in better detail.
19:34:03 <davidlenwell> sure..
19:34:29 <davidlenwell> #topic revisit signed use case
19:35:13 <catherineD> Wiki update
19:35:29 <davidlenwell> ahh .. sorry I did skip one didn't I
19:35:34 <davidlenwell> #topic wiki update
19:35:50 <davidlenwell> our wiki is embarassingly out of date
19:36:12 <davidlenwell> I think our first measure should be to remove all current wiki pages and replace them with our current readme text
19:36:20 <catherineD> our Wiki is very out-of-date and need update
19:36:38 <davidlenwell> thoughts?
19:37:13 <catherineD> davidlenwell: +1 at least update to current readme
19:37:23 <sslypushenko__> agreed
19:37:37 <catherineD> who can do that?  Any special credential to update Wiki?
19:37:40 <davidlenwell> the current readme is the most updated piece of text we have on the project and our progress
19:37:50 <davidlenwell> anyone whos of the foundation can
19:37:55 <davidlenwell> a foundation member
19:37:58 <davidlenwell> not employee
19:38:07 <davidlenwell> so any of us who are contributers can update it
19:38:13 <catherineD> ic
19:38:32 <davidlenwell> I can do it if nobody else has time
19:39:24 <davidlenwell> I have a few cycles for refstack this week.. and this is important ..
19:39:30 <catherineD> davidlenwell:  I take the you will do it :-) ... I have never done wiki update before ...
19:39:56 <catherineD> especially now we also have the workflow that sslypushenko__: has document ...
19:40:06 <catherineD> documented
19:40:25 <davidlenwell> I'll take care of it
19:40:31 <sslypushenko__> If it is necessary I can redraw it in proper format
19:40:39 <catherineD> #agreed David will update the refstack wiki
19:40:42 <davidlenwell> sslypushenko__: I can export
19:40:48 <catherineD> davidlenwell: thx
19:41:26 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: thx for redraw if needed ..
19:41:58 <sslypushenko__> Please mail me, if needed
19:42:07 <davidlenwell> okay .. I think that covers that topic for now .
19:42:13 <davidlenwell> #topic 5) pending review
19:43:01 <catherineD> we are doing good ... only 2 outstanding patches ...
19:43:50 <catherineD> davidlenwell: you are reviewing pvaneck: 's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174951/   ?
19:44:19 <davidlenwell> yes
19:45:01 <catherineD> I think we should review  sslypushenko__:  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161315/
19:45:57 <catherineD> since the latest DefCore test schema will include UUID ..
19:46:37 <catherineD> I should say the schema patch is submitted by hogepodge:  and is under reviewed ..
19:46:42 <sslypushenko__> I think we can review it because idempotent_id works for qa team, and they don't want change them
19:46:55 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: ++1
19:47:36 <davidlenwell> works for me
19:47:45 <catherineD> me too ..
19:48:00 <catherineD> so we will review that patch ...
19:49:07 <davidlenwell> okay.. lets change to open discussion
19:49:14 <hogepodge> I'd like to get the qa team to see the value of accepting your patch sslypushenko__
19:49:24 <hogepodge> It may be a longer discussion though.
19:49:31 <sslypushenko__> hogepodge Thx
19:49:49 <davidlenwell> #topic 6) open discussion
19:50:27 <hogepodge> #link qa discussion topics, open until the 30th
19:50:28 <hogepodge> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-qa-summit-topics
19:53:07 <catherineD> so next Refstack IRC meeting is the last chance for us to discuss any topic we want to submit to qa discussion topics...
19:54:32 <hogepodge> Has anyone contacted infra about refstack hosting?
19:54:36 <hogepodge> That was on the agenda last week.
19:55:31 <davidlenwell> rocky was supposed to follow up  on that .. however since she is not here.. I am going to check in with them this week
19:56:33 <davidlenwell> covered that earlier
19:56:44 <davidlenwell> any other topics to discuss?  we are running short on time.
19:57:49 <davidlenwell> okay.. lets move it on out of here.. we can chat in #refstack if anything else comes up ..
19:57:50 <davidlenwell> #endmeeting