19:02:44 <catherineD> #startmeeting refstack 19:02:45 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Jul 13 19:02:44 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:02:46 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:02:49 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack' 19:03:03 <catherineD> Roll call 19:03:16 <sslypushenko__> o/ 19:03:17 <pvaneck> o/ 19:03:21 <hogepodge> o/ 19:03:30 <catherineD> agenda #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-15-07-13 19:04:03 <davidlenwell> o/ 19:04:23 <catherineD> hello everyone .. 19:04:27 <davidlenwell> hi! 19:04:36 <catherineD> #topic Relocate RefStack Project 19:04:55 <davidlenwell> hi .. sorry .. that was my task.. and Akanda related work has consumed my entire week.. 19:06:43 <pvaneck> This is just the project rename? 19:07:12 <catherineD> No this is moving our project to OpensStack-Infra 19:07:38 <catherineD> I believe we will need to submit patch(es) to Infra ... 19:08:10 <hogepodge> I'm not certain how to move the hosting forward now that the spec has been approved 19:09:02 <catherineD> davidlenwell: do you know what need to be done to go forward ? Or do we need to find out? 19:09:31 <davidlenwell> fungi: can you answer the question from hogepodge ? 19:09:38 <pvaneck> so we do have this review up in system-config: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198869/ 19:10:06 <fungi> davidlenwell: hogepodge: i added a review to create the server, but it needs some more work and i'm in and out of availability since i just bought a house 19:10:12 <fungi> anyone is welcome to take over that review 19:10:26 * fungi digs up the link from last week 19:10:37 <catherineD> I https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198869/ is to create server .. 19:11:38 <catherineD> we are discussing moving Refstack project from stackforge to OpenStack-Infra 19:12:04 <davidlenwell> yes .. So I don't know the exact steps for this .. but I imagine its a governacne patch and a infra projects patch to make it sop 19:12:07 <davidlenwell> so 19:12:18 <fungi> yep, sorry that's the right one. i'm trying to internet from a wireless modem since this house has no internet hooked up yet 19:16:58 <catherineD> fungi: do you know the exact steps to move the Refstack project from stackforge to OpenStack_Infra? 19:17:13 <catherineD> fungi: or do you have a contact name? 19:18:00 <catherineD> I guess we can discuss with fungi: later ... 19:18:33 <fungi> catherineD: did the technical committee approve refstack as a new project, or was an existing official project team identified who will be responsible for it? 19:19:25 <catherineD> fungi: I don't think we have get the apporval from the technical committee yet ... 19:19:26 <davidlenwell> fungi: infra is the responsible team as far as I know 19:19:26 <fungi> the first step is to get it accepted by the technical committee into the list at http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/index.html 19:19:34 <catherineD> I guess that would be our next step .. 19:20:27 <fungi> oh, if refstack is going to be part of openstack-infra specifically then check with jeblair since he's the ptl of the project-team you say is adopting refstack 19:21:22 <catherineD> fungi: thx so checking with jeblair is our next step then? 19:21:23 <fungi> note that hosting the web service on our servers doesn't _necessarily_ mean that the software running that web service is governed by the infra project-team 19:22:11 <catherineD> davidlenwell: would you like to contact jeblair or I can help too ... 19:22:12 <fungi> catherineD: from what davidlenwell is saying, it sounds like there must have already been some existing conversation implying that refstack was going to become an openstack-infra repo rather than remaining a separate project-team 19:23:31 <catherineD> fungi: unless davidlenwell: had contacted jeblair else thus far the conversasions were among Refstack team .. 19:24:04 <davidlenwell> jeblair and I have had this discussion since the begining of refstack 19:24:15 <davidlenwell> it should come as a surprise to him 19:24:45 <catherineD> #action davidlenwell: catherineD: to contact jeblair for next steps to relocate Refstack to OpenStack-Infra 19:24:45 <fungi> anyway, those are the two options. either stackforge/refstack is adopted by an existing project-team recognized by the tc, or asks the tc to recognize it as a new project-team 19:25:07 <catherineD> fungi: thx .. 19:25:11 <davidlenwell> I think the plan was always to fall under infra 19:25:21 <lifeless> o/ 19:25:23 <davidlenwell> not to be our own project 19:25:27 <davidlenwell> hi lifeless 19:25:30 <fungi> and then we have a change to the openstack/governance repo to indicate the change in namespace, and a corresponding change to openstack-infra/project-config to edit it in all the configuration files for the new name 19:25:33 <catherineD> davidlenwell: We have decided to move under Infra 19:25:49 <davidlenwell> catherineD: I'm aware of that .. im not talking abotu name space 19:25:53 <davidlenwell> im talking about goverance 19:25:59 <catherineD> davidlenwell: ic 19:26:14 <davidlenwell> if any project team should own refstack .. its infra 19:27:15 <catherineD> ready to move onto the next topic ? 19:27:52 <catherineD> #topic refstack.net Site 19:28:04 <davidlenwell> yes 19:28:32 <davidlenwell> So I've moved refstack.net to a dreamhost compute instance.. this instance is free for as long as we need it.. There will be no more 173 dollar bills 19:28:48 <catherineD> hogepodge: As discusse last week, David got a bill for $187 for refstack,net .. you were checking on whether OpenStack Foundation can sponsor and reimburse ? 19:28:50 <davidlenwell> hogepodge: has already agreed to have the foundation reimburse me for the charges on the original 19:29:01 <catherineD> davidlenwell: wow 19:29:01 <davidlenwell> catherineD: its done 19:29:19 <catherineD> hogepodge: thank you sooooo much!!! 19:29:31 <hogepodge> no problem 19:30:02 <catherineD> so refstack.net is now on DreamHost ... 19:30:17 <catherineD> #topic Infra Hosting 19:30:57 <catherineD> This is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198869/ ... 19:32:02 <catherineD> lifeless: would you be able to help review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198869/ ? 19:33:56 <pvaneck> the puppet repo is in infra as mentioned last week. 19:34:05 <pvaneck> i submitted a patch here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/puppet-refstack,n,z 19:34:17 <pvaneck> not sure who is core there 19:34:44 <catherineD> I guess we will need some help on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198869/ ... 19:35:06 <catherineD> and Paul's patch .... 19:37:31 <catherineD> #action Paul to find out core to approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198910/ 19:39:23 <catherineD> #action checking on status of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198869/ next week 19:39:49 <catherineD> #topic Set up eavesdrop for refstack channel 19:40:21 <catherineD> hogepodge: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198621/ was merged ... any next steps ...? 19:40:42 <hogepodge> Nope, should be good to go. 19:40:55 <hogepodge> it's automated, so everything is in place 19:41:12 <catherineD> hogepodge: great .. thx a lot! .. 19:41:51 <catherineD> for taking care of this ... now we have our #refstack logs for review ... 19:42:07 <catherineD> #topic Tokyo Refstack sessions 19:43:03 <catherineD> hogepodge: It would be nice if we can have a formal schedule (time and room) for Refstack meeting at Tokyo ... do you know what we need to do to schedule? 19:43:25 <davidlenwell> There are usually open meeting rooms that people can use adhock 19:44:12 <hogepodge> I can ask around. The process behind the room selection for summits can be opaque to me. Room space is going to be really hard for Tokyo. We just don't have the room that we had in Vancouver 19:44:28 <catherineD> davidlenwell: yes that were what we did in the last 2 summit ... 19:44:37 <davidlenwell> usually there is a breakout room 19:44:50 <catherineD> hogepodge: ic .. 19:45:38 <catherineD> #action hogepodge: to try find out whether it is possible to schedule a room for Refstack meeting at Tokyo 19:46:28 <catherineD> we will submit a speaker session for #refstack ... Could you please review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack_tokyo_speaker_session 19:46:55 <sslypushenko__> Looks good) 19:47:28 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: hope we can meet you at Tokyo 19:47:46 <catherineD> #topic OpenStackID integration 19:47:52 <sslypushenko__> I hope too) 19:48:34 <catherineD> OpenStackID integration is moving on welll ... sslypushenko__: has 2 WIP ... 19:48:52 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: is this https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1v7exKKL1zSA102Xu8FkY1u9rMVUE6BjwUCoWGYYvbaI/edit#slide=id.g3005a843b_0_11 19:49:15 <sslypushenko__> It needs to be updated 19:49:19 <catherineD> still good ? I want to add that doc to refstack wiki .. 19:49:54 <sslypushenko__> I'm planning to finish UI for uploading pubkeys 19:50:02 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: ok I will wait then ... Please let me know when you have the update ... no hurry we can work on merging the UI code first ... 19:50:26 <catherineD> #topic Refstack need SSL 19:50:29 <sslypushenko__> And than I'll update docs 19:50:46 <davidlenwell> catherineD: isn't registering ssl for refstack.org part of the infra hosting thing? 19:50:47 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: great thx .. 19:51:27 <catherineD> davidlenwell: just want to see is there anything else? 19:51:28 <catherineD> if that is it then we have it cover ... 19:51:42 <davidlenwell> I believe they'll handle that 19:52:00 <catherineD> ok then that is good ... 19:52:56 <catherineD> #agree Refstack SSL will be handled with Refstack server hosting at Infra 19:53:06 <catherineD> #topic subunit2sql evaluation and adoption 19:53:35 <catherineD> sslypushenko__: you were looking at subunit2sql ... 19:53:37 <sslypushenko__> catherineD I have a bad new about subunit2sql 19:53:44 <sslypushenko__> *news 19:54:17 <sslypushenko__> It cann't be used by refstack right now 19:54:22 <catherineD> what is it? We won't be able to adopt ... 19:54:39 <catherineD> yes .. I take a quick look and believe so too .. 19:55:00 <sslypushenko__> subunit2sql doesn't use idempotent ids is test unique indenifier 19:55:20 <davidlenwell> mtreinish: ^^ 19:55:42 <sslypushenko__> davidlenwell He is on top of it 19:56:06 <sslypushenko__> We need to resolve uuid duplication issue first 19:56:08 <mtreinish> sslypushenko__: that shouldn't be a blocker for adoption 19:56:20 <sslypushenko__> But it is 19:56:35 <mtreinish> you just need to assign additional metadata to tests like I described in my email 19:57:05 <sslypushenko__> Right not any test move will broke test results 19:57:52 <sslypushenko__> So we need to track changes og test FQN to undestand the real results 19:58:12 <mtreinish> sslypushenko__: no it won't all the data is there it's just not the primary key 19:58:35 <catherineD> mtreinish: the other reason that I see we won't be able to adopt for now isfor refstack the subunit processing is done at server side ... and #resstack does not ship the subunit file only the pass tests... so the process had to ben done at the client side which has no DB ... 19:58:49 <sslypushenko__> It will be better finally solve issue with uuid duplication 19:59:38 <mtreinish> catherineD: well I've always found that model weird, but you don't actually have to use the subunit2sql utility. Just leverage the python api to handle writing to the db on the server side 19:59:55 <sslypushenko__> catherineD DB is not a big deal, we can you mysql-in-docker for that 20:00:24 <catherineD> Let's discuss this in #refstack 20:00:32 <sslypushenko__> +1 20:00:49 <catherineD> #endmeeting