19:00:19 <catherineD> #startmeeting refstack
19:00:20 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Mar 28 19:00:19 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'refstack'
19:01:21 <pvaneck> o/
19:02:19 <catherineD> pvaneck: hi .. let's wait for a few mins
19:02:43 <catherineD> #link meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-03-28
19:05:27 <catherineD> ok Let's start..
19:05:50 <catherineD> #topic RefStack Newton summit discussion topics
19:06:20 <sslypushenko> o/
19:06:27 <catherineD> sslypushenko: Hi
19:06:39 <Rockyg> o/
19:06:40 <catherineD> Agenda https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-03-28
19:07:33 <catherineD> I started an etherpad for Austin summit topics
19:07:39 <catherineD> #link     Please add your topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-newton-summit
19:08:17 <catherineD> I also find that RefStack has a conflict session with EC2=API Wed  11:00 - 11:40 . I plan to ask for reschedule of this RefStack sessions so that Alex and Andrey can attend the RefStack session.
19:08:41 <pvaneck> well, they still have the two sessions before it right?
19:09:05 <pvaneck> speaker session is monday?
19:09:43 <catherineD> I think so let's double check
19:10:08 <catherineD> it is Monday
19:10:56 <catherineD> please take a look a add topics that we should discuss
19:11:14 <catherineD> sslypushenko: Rockyg: Have you booked your hotel?
19:12:03 <Rockyg> Yes.  Hilton
19:12:18 <catherineD> so right at the conference site ?
19:12:40 <Rockyg> yup
19:12:53 <catherineD> lucky you :-)
19:12:54 <sslypushenko> catherineD:  I don't know) Someone from our company do organization stuff for our team
19:13:48 <catherineD> sslypushenko: ic .... I am so glad that we will finally meet after 2 or 3 years working together
19:13:59 <Rockyg> ++
19:14:04 <sslypushenko> yeap)) me too)
19:14:24 <catherineD> moving on ..
19:14:33 <catherineD> #topic Make puppet pull releases from Pypi
19:14:57 <catherineD> pvaneck: could you give an update ..
19:15:37 <pvaneck> well, we finally have the two +2s... will push for the merge later in the day
19:16:06 <catherineD> pvaneck: great  ... thank you... it has been a long journey :-)
19:16:31 <catherineD> #topic Vendor user management implementation
19:17:26 <catherineD> #link     Add user management REST API  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285714/   finally merged last Saturday ... There were a lot problems with Jenkin last week ...
19:18:18 <catherineD> moving on ...
19:18:21 <pvaneck> npm jobs had high failure rates
19:18:34 <pvaneck> horizon was experiencing them as well
19:19:07 <pvaneck> http://tinyurl.com/h9h4evp a relevant graph
19:19:14 <catherineD> pvaneck: yea ... is there any other project besides  horizon and refstack ?
19:19:25 <catherineD> I guess any projects with UI
19:20:01 <pvaneck> yea, a few others using js
19:20:44 <catherineD> now we know .. weekend with fewer jobs is the better time for recheck ...
19:20:51 <catherineD> #topic Vendor registation
19:21:30 <catherineD> #link Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274837/ was merged March 3
19:21:38 <catherineD> no implementation so far
19:22:01 <catherineD> Last week Alex indicated that they are busy until end of March ...
19:22:27 <catherineD> Will check with Alex and Anddrey at the end of the week ...
19:23:18 <pvaneck> there is implementation in the WIP new refstack model patch
19:23:44 <pvaneck> but maybe not completely to spec, and it would also have to be extracted into a separate patch
19:23:53 <catherineD> looks like RefStack won't be able to meet our target for vendor and product registration for Mitaka
19:24:09 <catherineD> pvaneck: ++
19:24:45 <pvaneck> we shall see
19:24:49 <catherineD> Let's check with Alex and Andrey .. Maybe some other RefStack members can help
19:25:35 <catherineD> Rockyg: this is the reason I was delaying the response to your project target requests ...
19:26:39 <catherineD> We did not meet the targets that we set for the Mitaka release and it affect the planning for the next release ...
19:26:47 <catherineD> moving on ..
19:27:07 <catherineD> #topic Product registration
19:27:42 <catherineD> #link Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292526/   needs review
19:29:46 <catherineD> I expect there will be a lot of discussion on this spec ...
19:30:16 <catherineD> Again Alex and Andrey are busy we will wait until end of March
19:30:32 <catherineD> #topic Pending reviews
19:31:06 <catherineD> #link REST API specification to retrieve DefCore Guideline files  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296829/
19:31:44 <catherineD> sslypushenko: could you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296829/
19:31:59 <sslypushenko> catherineD:  on my way
19:32:15 <catherineD> sslypushenko: thx
19:32:46 <catherineD> #link Handle the cases guideline download failure with Test list download.  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296985/
19:33:38 <catherineD> pvaneck: do you think the changes in this patch are still needed with the API in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296829/  are implemented?
19:33:50 <catherineD> will we update the js to call the API?
19:34:26 <pvaneck> eh i think still having client-side generated tests list is still nice
19:34:45 <catherineD> pvaneck: ok
19:34:55 <catherineD> moving on
19:35:04 <catherineD> #topic Open Discussion
19:36:12 <catherineD> sslypushenko: pvaneck: I will set up a meeting later to discuss the topics and agenda for the session ... may be on Wed oir Thur ... I will need to check with Chris on his schedule too
19:36:36 <sslypushenko> catherineD:  sure
19:36:40 <catherineD> sslypushenko: which day is better for you or both are good ?
19:37:07 <sslypushenko> both will work, but wed is little bit better
19:37:24 <pvaneck> wed is better for me as well
19:37:37 <catherineD> sslypushenko: OK I will check with Chris
19:38:23 <catherineD> is 17 UTC OK?
19:38:38 <Rockyg> I think so.
19:38:38 <catherineD> on Wed
19:40:01 <sslypushenko> I'd prefer a little bit latter time, 18 UTC will ok
19:40:22 <sslypushenko> or even 19 UTC
19:40:33 <catherineD> OK we  shoot for 18 or 19 UTC?
19:40:41 <catherineD> sslypushenko: thx
19:40:57 <catherineD> what time is 19 UTC for you ?
19:41:23 <sslypushenko> 10pm
19:41:52 <catherineD> so after the meeting will be 11:00 pm :-)
19:42:05 <sslypushenko> that is ok)
19:42:17 <catherineD> anything else to discuss?
19:42:28 <pvaneck> good here
19:42:30 <sslypushenko> Minor question about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296829...
19:42:54 <catherineD> sure
19:43:11 <sslypushenko> Do we really sure that this spec will cover any future changes in Defcore guidelines?
19:44:11 <catherineD> sslypushenko: we know it covers all features releated to test list today ... we will need to update as the DefCore schema changes
19:45:00 <catherineD> like Foundation may add more target programs ..
19:45:02 <Rockyg> ++
19:45:06 <sslypushenko> API versioning can be pain in the ass, so should be prepared, if we want to move to API approach instead of just single data file
19:45:25 <catherineD> sslypushenko: agree
19:46:02 <sslypushenko> So, my actual question is, do we really need to move to new approach?
19:46:20 <catherineD> sslypushenko: yes that is a request by Chris at the mid cycle
19:46:29 <catherineD> DefCore mid-cycle
19:46:58 <sslypushenko> ok, then
19:47:14 <catherineD> mainly because of alias test names
19:47:40 <catherineD> test and path name changes in Tempest
19:48:06 <sslypushenko> I'll review the spec. It should be a little bite general  and extandeble
19:48:07 <catherineD> I just submit this in the week end https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297993/
19:48:39 <catherineD> sslypushenko: sure ...please leave comments ... that is why we need review ... thx
19:49:06 <sslypushenko> ok, will try)
19:49:25 <catherineD> ideally people should test with all API test and not just from a list ... but that is how people have been testing ...
19:49:34 <catherineD> sslypushenko: thank you!
19:50:15 <catherineD> anything else?
19:50:47 <sslypushenko> catherineD:  It is my pleasure to work in RefStack team)
19:51:23 <catherineD> sslypushenko: you are a very valuable reviewer that we can count on !!
19:52:29 <Rockyg> ++
19:52:43 <catherineD> anything else?  if not the US west coast people got 9 mins for a quick lunch?  :-)
19:52:58 <catherineD> Thank you all!!!
19:53:01 <Rockyg> :-)
19:53:05 <sslypushenko> ))
19:53:17 <catherineD> #endmeeting