16:03:30 <ttx> #startmeeting releaseteam
16:03:31 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 13 16:03:30 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:03:32 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:03:35 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
16:03:43 <ttx> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ussuri-relmgt-tracking
16:03:56 <ttx> down to... 328-ish
16:03:57 <hberaud> o/
16:04:20 <ttx> #topic milestone-2 status
16:04:33 <smcginnis_> I believe I got everything posted.
16:04:33 <ttx> smcginnis_ did push a number of patches
16:04:39 <smcginnis_> Still waiting for ack on several.
16:04:42 <ttx> Not so any acks
16:04:53 <ttx> Also that PTL-Approved feature is NEAT
16:05:00 <fungi> how is it working out?
16:05:04 <ttx> (especially for this scenario)
16:05:04 <fungi> i haven't followed closely
16:05:15 <smcginnis_> There were a bunch at first, but the ones leftover are either waiting for final patches or folks are not paying attention.
16:05:25 <smcginnis_> Loving the PTL-ack flag.
16:05:38 <fungi> are all the kinks worked out at this point, as far as you know?
16:05:54 <smcginnis_> Seems like it.
16:06:16 <smcginnis_> ttx Added a dump of the Gerrit json for an occcasional failure we have.
16:06:18 <ttx> fungi: yes, we should have good logging in case of glitches
16:06:23 <evrardjp> That's awesome indeed
16:07:02 <ttx> so... as usual we are supposed to force releases for those without -1 by tomorrow
16:07:02 <smcginnis_> So for the non-ack’d patches, wait until Monday?
16:07:12 <smcginnis_> Yeah, we do state tomorrow.
16:07:21 <smcginnis_> In practice, I think we’ve usually waited a little longer.
16:07:24 <fungi> seems like this is a pattern other teams could use to get acknowledgement from liaisons
16:07:26 <ttx> and give until next week meeting to those who explicitly asked us to wait
16:07:29 <smcginnis_> But I actually got the patches up in time this time around.
16:07:37 <ttx> smcginnis_: your call really
16:07:54 <smcginnis_> I will send out a reminder today and see if that gets more of a response.
16:08:22 <ttx> can you +2A https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707605/1
16:08:31 <ttx> that will allow to merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707642/
16:09:14 <ttx> since I rebased on it to check that it fixes the eyal-not-detected issue
16:09:32 <smcginnis_> If my auth ever comes back, will do.
16:09:50 <ttx> ok anything else on ussuri-2?
16:10:00 <ttx> smcginnis_: do you ahve all you need to push it in the coming days?
16:10:00 <smcginnis_> I think otherwise we are good shapel
16:10:11 <smcginnis_> Yes, I believe so.
16:10:21 <ttx> #topic aclissues check
16:10:29 <smcginnis_> I did not get this task done yet.
16:10:30 <ttx> smcginnis_: did you run it? It's unclear from the tracker
16:10:32 <ttx> ok.
16:10:35 <smcginnis_> Been a crazy week.
16:10:38 <ttx> I can run it if you want
16:10:45 <ttx> We wanted someone else to try it tho
16:10:47 <smcginnis_> Sorry, would you mind?
16:10:52 <ttx> No pb
16:10:56 <smcginnis_> Thank you.
16:10:57 <ttx> i can do that after the meeting
16:11:15 <ttx> #topic Countdown email review
16:11:16 <smcginnis_> We do need to get someone other than you doing that at some point.
16:11:30 * smcginnis_ reviews
16:11:35 <ttx> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails
16:12:00 <ttx> down to line 141
16:12:02 <smcginnis_> Short and sweet. Looks good to me.
16:12:16 <ttx> yeah, I split the content of this one in two
16:12:24 <ttx> since we plan to send another one in a couple of weeks
16:12:31 <smcginnis_> +1
16:12:44 <ttx> and that's where we'll complain about missing intermediary things
16:12:57 <smcginnis_> That makes sense to me.
16:13:03 <evrardjp> I am lagging behind, I am not sure I can judge this right now
16:13:10 <ttx> ok, send at will
16:13:19 <ttx> #topic Any other business?
16:13:20 <smcginnis_> Will queue it up for tomorrow.
16:13:35 <smcginnis_> evrardjp: If you do spend some time and see anything to note, just let me know.
16:13:43 <ttx> Note that we are skipping next week meeting
16:13:58 <ttx> but there are still a few tasks to do
16:14:02 <smcginnis_> Should (hopefully) be a quiet week.
16:14:13 <evrardjp> reason?
16:14:19 <evrardjp> sorry I totally missed the ball recently
16:14:40 <smcginnis_> Just being post-milestone2 week.
16:14:47 <ttx> reason is more, no point in having meetings if we can skip them
16:14:49 <smcginnis_> Or reason for skipping the meeting?
16:15:00 <evrardjp> yeah I meant reason for skipping
16:15:06 <smcginnis_> +1 to what ttx said
16:15:07 <ttx> we'll have weekly ones soon enough when we start to hit the end of the cycle
16:15:09 <evrardjp> if we still have things to iron out for the next week
16:15:25 <ttx> evrardjp: nothing requiring a meeting. Just a couple of TODOs
16:15:30 <smcginnis_> Just some tasks to get done. But hopefully nothing that requires a meeting for discussion.
16:15:38 <evrardjp> yeah, we can still sync via other means anyway
16:15:45 <evrardjp> oki dokey
16:15:46 <ttx> like me updating the process patch, and smcginnis posting a Victoria scehdule
16:16:05 <smcginnis_> But if anything does come up, just let me know and we can either discuss in channel.
16:16:12 <ttx> ++
16:16:18 <ttx> Alright, anything else for today?
16:16:18 <smcginnis_> I do have it on my todo to plan out the schedule.
16:16:39 <smcginnis_> Should be roughly the same in relation to the opendev event.
16:16:49 <smcginnis_> Then we can start looking at W. ;)
16:16:57 <smcginnis_> Nothing else from me for today.
16:17:30 <ttx> going once
16:17:38 <ttx> going twice
16:17:44 <ttx> #endmeeting