16:00:13 <smcginnis> #startmeeting releaseteam
16:00:14 <openstack> Meeting started Thu May  7 16:00:13 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is smcginnis. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:15 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:17 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
16:00:18 <smcginnis> Ping list: ttx armstrong diablo_rojo, diablo_rojo_phon
16:00:27 <smcginnis> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ussuri-relmgt-tracking Agenda
16:00:36 <ttx> o/
16:01:20 <diablo_rojo> o/
16:01:49 <smcginnis> #topic Review week tasks completion
16:01:59 <smcginnis> Processing remaining stable branches.
16:02:03 <armstrong> o/
16:02:09 <smcginnis> I believe that's all complete.
16:02:25 * ttx checks
16:02:34 <smcginnis> Next, notify documentation team.
16:02:51 <smcginnis> Some nice notes in the etherpad for that. Looks like evrardjp and team got everything in place.
16:03:04 <smcginnis> "Test the release process"
16:03:25 <hberaud> o/
16:03:28 <smcginnis> Patch is up. You can go ahead and approve that whenever hberaud.
16:03:34 <smcginnis> Thanks for the docs updates for those things too.
16:04:12 <hberaud> you're welcome, I currently prepare other similar updates
16:04:15 <smcginnis> And for the next of getting final RCs for anyone that has merged things other than translations and CI things.
16:04:25 <smcginnis> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:r1-final-rc-deadline+(status:open+OR+status:merged)) Final RCs
16:05:53 <ttx> re:stable, we seem to be missing one: patrole
16:06:07 <ttx> (all the other missing are cycle-trailing)
16:06:35 <smcginnis> Isn't patrole like devstack and not branched?
16:06:35 <ttx> hmm
16:06:39 <ttx> stable-branch-type: none
16:06:47 <smcginnis> OK, good.
16:06:54 <ttx> probably should not be reported by list-deliverables --no-stable-branch --series ussuri --cycle-based-no-trailing
16:06:54 <gmann> yeah, patrole is branchless like tempest
16:07:33 <smcginnis> ttx: I think I had noticed that before and never had time to dig into why/how it should be excluded from there.
16:07:37 * ttx adds to backlog
16:07:43 <smcginnis> We don't get tempest in the list, so not sure what's different.
16:07:52 <ttx> (at the bottom of the etherpad)
16:07:53 <smcginnis> #topic Assign next week tasks
16:07:58 <smcginnis> ttx: Thanks!
16:08:17 <smcginnis> First one is really a reminder for all of us.
16:08:36 <smcginnis> Nothing should really be happening until the final tagging unless it's a critical thing to release.
16:09:04 <smcginnis> ttx, diablo_rojo: Any word on coordination for a press release?
16:09:21 <ttx> smcginnis: Press release is scheduled at 10am CT
16:09:23 <ttx> 15 UTC
16:09:42 <smcginnis> So "On release day, approve the final release patch created earlier." should happen early.
16:09:52 <ttx> We have a community call at 16UTC iirc
16:09:59 <ttx> err 14UTC
16:10:29 <ttx> smcginnis: I can approve it in my morning if you want
16:10:33 <diablo_rojo> Yeah 14 UTC
16:10:35 <smcginnis> So maybe 12UTC would be a good target?
16:10:40 <ttx> assuming you close the previous day with a +2
16:10:56 <smcginnis> ttx: I'll put you're name down for the task, but will probably be watching.
16:11:32 <smcginnis> Anyone want to take the check for missing-releases?
16:11:42 <hberaud> done
16:11:43 <smcginnis> Thanks hberaud
16:11:57 <smcginnis> I will update the releases.o.o info.
16:12:15 <smcginnis> Which includes setting default series in the data file.
16:12:19 <ttx> I can run missing-releases if you want... or did hberaud volunteer?
16:12:30 <hberaud> I'm volunteer
16:12:32 <smcginnis> He did
16:12:33 <ttx> ok
16:12:44 <smcginnis> And I will send out the announcements.
16:14:11 <smcginnis> #topic Review countdown email
16:14:20 <smcginnis> Hmm, I don't remember if I staged the next week.
16:14:30 <smcginnis> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails
16:14:36 <smcginnis> Guess I did.
16:15:27 <smcginnis> Not too much to say since this is the release week.
16:15:33 <ttx> smcginnis: email content implies that we process all those last-RCs before its' sent
16:15:46 <ttx> so maybe wait until late Friday to send it :)
16:16:11 <smcginnis> Made a note.
16:16:26 <ttx> so we need to get an ack on those ASAP
16:16:33 <ttx> or just abandon them if not
16:16:59 <smcginnis> I think there were only a couple that had important looking bugfixes.
16:17:05 <smcginnis> Most were just good to have translations.
16:17:23 <smcginnis> Not to discount any work the translations team has done, but just saying in relative importance.
16:17:33 <ttx> OK would be good to document that in the review, and chase down those with significant stuff
16:18:36 <ttx> I'll add a comment on those starting from bottom
16:18:42 <smcginnis> Thanks!
16:18:49 <hberaud> we could until wednesday before drop those who stayed unmerged and with importance
16:18:59 <hberaud> s/with/without/
16:19:04 <smcginnis> We need to way before Wednesday.
16:19:18 <smcginnis> Today is the deadline for a reason.
16:19:25 <hberaud> ok
16:19:55 <smcginnis> #topic PTG or not PTG
16:20:37 <ttx> we are already late for signing up
16:21:07 <ttx> we could sign up by booking at last minute though
16:21:19 <smcginnis> Which was the plan right. Easier for us to fit in where there's time left after everything else is settled.
16:21:19 <ttx> Just won;t appear on the published schedule
16:21:29 <ttx> and will have limited solutions
16:21:44 <smcginnis> diablo_rojo: Have the ethercalc link handy?
16:21:49 <diablo_rojo> smcginnis, yep
16:21:51 <diablo_rojo> one sec
16:22:03 <diablo_rojo> https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy
16:22:15 <diablo_rojo> #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy PTG Ethercalc Signup
16:22:31 <diablo_rojo> smcginnis, also need to do the survey once that is done
16:22:35 * diablo_rojo grabs that link too
16:23:15 <diablo_rojo> #link https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/june2020_virtual_ptg_survey PTG Survey
16:23:45 <smcginnis> What do folks think of June 1 in the 13-14UTC time slot?
16:24:30 <smcginnis> Or 21-22, but I know that's getting late for EU.
16:24:38 <smcginnis> Not like any of us are going anywhere.
16:24:57 <ttx> June 1 works, was waiting for the TC pick
16:24:58 <diablo_rojo> I'd obviously prefer the 21-22
16:25:32 <diablo_rojo> Particularly since I should attend the Interop stuff.
16:25:33 <ttx> 21UTC works for me too
16:25:55 <smcginnis> Or 16-17 on June 2 looks like it could work well and be a better timeslot for most.
16:26:20 <diablo_rojo> Works for me.
16:26:25 <hberaud> +1 for 13-14 or 16-17
16:26:50 <smcginnis> I think June 2 16-17 would be my preference, but I can make any of these work.
16:27:37 <ttx> ok how about we wait for the TC pick to choose between those
16:27:44 <ttx> should come soonish
16:28:07 <smcginnis> ttx: Any idea when that is planned to be decided?
16:28:33 <diablo_rojo> smcginnis, I saw the poll go out yesterday and responded.
16:28:36 <ttx> diablo_rojo probably knows better
16:29:11 <diablo_rojo> Looks like we've had 7 members respond so far?
16:29:29 <smcginnis> I suppose they are looking at the same times?
16:29:49 <diablo_rojo> smcginnis, yeah kinda
16:30:03 <diablo_rojo> #link https://doodle.com/poll/3ywuywu825hu7v23 TC PTG Poll
16:30:27 <diablo_rojo> All the times (but I think filtered on what mnaser could do?) basically.
16:30:52 <mnaser> diablo_rojo: those are all the times based on availablities :)
16:31:02 <diablo_rojo> mnaser, ohhhhh that makes sense.
16:31:04 <mnaser> some blocks had "rooms" blocked for all times
16:31:33 <diablo_rojo> mnaser, got it. okay, my bad :)
16:31:46 <smcginnis> OK, we can wait a bit then and pick our time based on what the TC goes with.
16:32:08 <smcginnis> #topic Open Floor
16:32:13 <smcginnis> Anything else to discuss today?
16:32:28 <diablo_rojo> Nothing from me.
16:32:41 <hberaud> +1
16:32:41 <ttx> nope, almost done extarcting significant changes from the RC requests
16:33:57 <smcginnis> OK, let's wrap it up then.
16:34:03 <smcginnis> Thanks everyone!
16:34:09 <smcginnis> #endmeeting