16:00:12 <smcginnis> #startmeeting releaseteam
16:00:16 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug 20 16:00:12 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is smcginnis. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:17 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:19 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
16:00:19 <hberaud> o/
16:00:21 <smcginnis> Ping list: ttx armstrong
16:00:27 <smcginnis> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/victoria-relmgt-tracking Agenda
16:01:05 <ttx> o/
16:01:46 <fungi> feels like it's been a while
16:01:51 <smcginnis> Will wait another minute or two.
16:02:05 <armstrong> o/
16:02:58 <smcginnis> #topic Abandon cycle-with-rc proposals that were not +1ed
16:03:16 <smcginnis> I was going to do this earlier, but then responses kept trickling in.
16:03:22 <ttx> magic
16:03:28 <smcginnis> I can abandon those now unless anyone has any objections.
16:03:54 <smcginnis> OK, will clean that up then.
16:04:08 <ttx> nope go for it
16:04:21 <hberaud> +1
16:04:27 <smcginnis> Done
16:04:31 <smcginnis> #topic Karbor status
16:04:57 <smcginnis> Looks like we may have someone paying attention there again?
16:05:04 <ttx> may have yes
16:05:22 <ttx> Would be good to test that assumption one way or another, before the end of the cycle
16:05:54 <ttx> maybe suggest a milestone release to exercise release machinery
16:06:03 <ttx> like making sure someone pays attention
16:07:09 <ttx> wdyt?
16:07:22 <smcginnis> Yeah, I think that would be good.
16:07:39 <smcginnis> It's been in an unknown state for awhile.
16:07:42 <ttx> not sure exactly how, but doing a test before it's too late to remove
16:07:52 <smcginnis> Would be good to validate that everything is working right before we hit the important deadlines.
16:07:59 <ttx> though I guess python-karborclient will soon be a good test
16:08:30 <smcginnis> We did do a release of that earlier this cycle.
16:08:33 <smcginnis> So that's good.
16:08:40 <smcginnis> I would be more concerned about the service.
16:09:51 <smcginnis> I suppose we could propose a .0b1 release/
16:10:09 <ttx> yeah, as a "release machinery test" even if it's not really needed
16:10:21 <smcginnis> Anyone want to take that action?
16:10:24 <ttx> just to test PTL's attention to cc in release patches
16:10:33 <smcginnis> ++
16:10:35 <ttx> I can do it if nobody wants it
16:10:53 <smcginnis> ttx: Thanks!
16:11:28 <smcginnis> We'll see how that goes and follow up on any issues next week, if not before.
16:11:35 <smcginnis> #topic Release schedule choice
16:11:48 <smcginnis> We had the two options.
16:12:01 <smcginnis> Not a lot of feedback, but the 26 week one definitely has had more support.
16:12:22 <smcginnis> The only unknown issue is the timing of an April/May 2021 event.
16:12:22 <ttx> would be good to clear with Arkady that his +1 to the 29w is not really a -1 to the 26w
16:12:39 <smcginnis> I can ping him
16:12:48 <ttx> I figured you could yes :)
16:13:14 <ttx> Otherwise I would just post a "we are going to move forward with the 26w one unless there are last-minute objections
16:13:17 <ttx> "
16:13:26 <ttx> follow-up to the thread
16:13:40 <ttx> since it may have been overlkooked in midsummer
16:13:46 <smcginnis> Pretty sure he was just voting that there was no issue for him, but I will confirm.
16:13:55 <smcginnis> I will post that follow up today.
16:14:02 <ttx> and then w can approve next week
16:14:10 <smcginnis> Sounds like a plan.
16:14:32 <smcginnis> Personally, I'm happy with a nice even 26 week schedule. :)
16:14:49 <smcginnis> #topic Assign R-7 tasks
16:14:50 <ttx> I just actioned you
16:14:54 <smcginnis> Thanks
16:15:18 <smcginnis> So first to tasks for next week, ttx just added from what we just spoke about. So those are covered.
16:15:38 <smcginnis> fungi: Do you want to notify yourself to generate an artifact signing key? :)
16:15:57 <ttx> consider yourself notified
16:15:57 <fungi> seems like you just did ;)
16:16:05 <fungi> added to my priority list
16:16:12 <smcginnis> hehe
16:16:29 <smcginnis> Next one from the process doc was to check with the TC on runtimes.
16:16:29 <fungi> thanks for the reminder!
16:16:45 <smcginnis> I actually brought the question up a few weeks ago, so we are all set for Wallaby runtimes.
16:16:58 <smcginnis> And I have a patch pending to add job templates for them:
16:17:10 <smcginnis> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/745916/ W job templates
16:17:18 <smcginnis> Just pending another +2A
16:18:00 <smcginnis> And I can send the countdown email, as usual.
16:18:11 <smcginnis> #topic Review email content
16:18:19 <smcginnis> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails
16:18:50 <smcginnis> fungi: With your election official hat... is the information regarding extra-ATCs correct there?
16:19:15 <smcginnis> That wasn't explicitly added to the schedule this cycle.
16:19:40 <smcginnis> So I guess we need to decide what to say for $extraatc date.
16:19:50 <smcginnis> Or reword that.
16:20:25 <fungi> yep, that looks correct aside from setting the date
16:21:34 <smcginnis> What should that be?
16:21:54 <ttx> I propsoed Aug 28
16:22:01 <ttx> like end of next week
16:22:12 <fungi> wfm
16:22:20 <smcginnis> OK, good for me too.
16:22:30 <fungi> the idea is that the updates are proposed with sufficient time for the tc to approve them before elections
16:22:38 <ttx> added a "future" so that people do not start to panic about elections
16:22:52 <smcginnis> I have the day off tomorrow, but I will send this out before shutting things down.
16:22:55 <smcginnis> ttx: Good call.
16:22:59 <ttx> sicne those were not announced yet
16:23:24 <smcginnis> #topic Open floor
16:23:48 <ttx> smcginnis: PTO soon?
16:23:53 <smcginnis> Just FYI, other than a little bit tomorrow, I will be out tomorrow through next Tuesday.
16:23:56 <ttx> are you going to see places?
16:24:15 <smcginnis> Road trip to the Rocky Mountains. Looking forward to getting out of the house for a bit.
16:24:30 <smcginnis> Hopefully not too many other people are trying to escape things by going there too.
16:24:31 <ttx> Places that are not home. I remember those. It was nice
16:24:39 <smcginnis> Heh, yep.
16:25:09 <smcginnis> Been awhile since I've been anywhere other than to pick up food. So really looking forward to a nice long road trip.
16:25:38 <smcginnis> Anything else to discuss?
16:25:38 <ttx> ok, have a great time!
16:25:42 <smcginnis> Thanks!
16:25:45 <hberaud> enjoy!
16:25:46 <ttx> I'll jump to another call
16:26:07 <smcginnis> Nothing more from me, so I guess we can wrap things up.
16:26:09 <smcginnis> Thanks everyone.
16:26:15 <ttx> cheers
16:26:16 <hberaud> smcginnis: thanks
16:26:30 <smcginnis> #endmeeting