16:00:01 #startmeeting releaseteam 16:00:02 Meeting started Thu Nov 19 16:00:01 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' 16:00:05 o/ 16:00:17 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-relmgt-tracking Agenda 16:00:46 We're way down on line 73 now. 16:00:59 Ping list: ttx armstrong elod 16:01:16 Will just wait a couple minutes for folks. 16:01:31 o/ (on other meeting, too, but trying to follow here as well :)) 16:01:39 :) 16:02:36 hberaud: thx for the poll, btw, hopefully I'll be at least as useful to worth the meeting time change :) 16:02:37 Fortunatelly next week the meeting time will be rescheduled http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018910.html 16:05:04 well, let's go! 16:05:17 #topic Assign R-20 tasks 16:05:39 Review cycle-trailing projects to check which haven’t released yet. 16:05:58 Any takers? 16:06:26 this task seems obvious 16:06:56 self assigned 16:07:17 next task 16:07:28 Send countdown email, I'm alreaday on it 16:08:09 hmm wait 16:08:16 wsure 16:08:18 sure 16:08:21 there is no countdown email to send i think 16:08:36 https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#week-before-milestone-1 16:08:42 this one ^ 16:08:50 right, so you have to send it the week before m-1 16:08:55 tat means, next week 16:08:56 we will be the week before m-1 16:09:05 yes 16:09:19 so we traditionally reviewed email contents the same week you would send it 16:09:34 Like the email is meant to be sent at the end of that week 16:09:40 I was thinking it should be reviewed the week before 16:10:05 ok 16:10:19 that's an option... just that when we add stuff to it it's generally last minute 16:10:32 like a thing we think at the last minute could be added 16:10:34 make sense 16:10:44 it's always been a cause for confusion though 16:10:55 email for week N is sent at end of week N-1 16:10:55 so we keep this one for the next week 16:11:36 The email content general;ly makes it clearer 16:11:46 ok 16:11:51 Like this one says "The $SERIES-1 milestone is next week!" 16:12:03 so it should be sent like on Thursday 16:12:21 Friday at worst 16:12:25 that what I was planed 16:12:35 but sending it on Tuesday could be confusing in some parts of the world 16:12:56 so the routine of reviewing on Thursday and sending it just after is imho the best 16:13:08 but I was just thinking review this one a bit earlier 16:13:20 I agree 16:13:28 I missed the last minute things 16:13:35 make sense 16:13:51 it's unlikely that we would add anything... I'm actually more concerned that we would accidentally send it after having reviewed it 16:14:11 rather than wait for the end of the week after 16:14:19 ack 16:15:05 anything else for task assignment? 16:15:28 no that works ! 16:15:31 then I think we can move on 16:15:47 #topic open floor 16:16:00 anything else? 16:16:31 one thing: thanks for reviewing the stein-em patches :) 16:16:53 hope everythink is now OK with the remaining open ones 16:16:57 As I said early today I think we can move on remaining patches related to stein-em 16:17:07 eolthanks for leading this! 16:17:09 https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:stein-em+(status:open) 16:17:13 elod: ^ 16:17:21 elod: thanks to you! 16:17:30 no problem 16:17:45 Just a few left with a -1. 16:18:09 yep concerning oslo we are waiting a bit for few important patches 16:18:11 I saw that neutron had some issue, so let's wait until they fix the last release :) 16:18:17 but they will be merged soon 16:18:50 elod: yes, I will tomorrow work on fix for that issue 16:19:01 in Oslo I only saw unrelevant patches some weeks ago, are there new ones? 16:19:05 do you think we want to force all the remaning patches at the end of the next week (by example)? 16:19:17 slaweq: thanks slaweq ! 16:19:41 elod: nope, just an import (old) oslo.messaging patch 16:20:08 hberaud: ack 16:20:30 Published transition date was the 11th. There will always be more things to backport. At some point we just have to call it done and cut it. 16:20:44 elod: thanks for your investigation on check-approval too 16:20:57 smcginnis: +1 16:21:14 hberaud: ++, there were no 'real' issues fortunately 16:23:15 then I think we can force all these patches, never mind if the oslo fix will be merged after, isn't a big deal 16:23:29 anything else? 16:24:00 not anymore from my side :) 16:24:10 Nothing from me. 16:24:19 nothing 16:24:23 OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up. 16:24:32 #endmeeting