17:00:01 <hberaud> #startmeeting releaseteam
17:00:02 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan 21 17:00:01 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:05 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
17:00:07 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-relmgt-tracking Agenda
17:00:10 <hberaud> Ping list: ttx armstrong elod
17:00:12 <armstrong> o/
17:00:15 <elod> o/
17:00:19 <hberaud> We're way down on line 261 now.
17:00:38 <fungi> this cycle has flows by, seems like
17:00:45 <hberaud> Will just wait a couple minutes for folks.
17:01:05 <hberaud> it seems
17:02:11 <ttx> o/
17:03:35 <hberaud> ok let's go
17:03:42 <hberaud> #topic Review task completion
17:04:05 <hberaud> Generate a list of all cycle-with-intermediary libraries which did not release since the YYYY-MM-DD date of milestone-1. => done
17:04:17 <hberaud> Nobody complain for now
17:04:35 <hberaud> we don't have any exception for now
17:04:42 <hberaud> I think we can go ahead
17:04:58 <hberaud> ttx do you want to push the final button? https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22w2-c-w-i%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
17:05:07 <ttx> sure looking
17:05:16 <hberaud> thanks
17:05:43 <ttx> hmm for those missing the PTL+1 we shoudl wait a bit more right
17:06:06 <hberaud> deadline is today but we can wait until tomorrow
17:06:14 <hberaud> or at least monday
17:06:20 <hberaud> any preference?
17:06:26 <ttx> we usually give them until the Monday and then +2a then
17:06:34 <hberaud> ok sold
17:06:59 <hberaud> Next task
17:07:13 <hberaud> Generate release requests for all cycle-with-intermediary libraries which had changes => ttx the floor is yours
17:08:18 <ttx> err
17:08:31 <ttx> nah that's not me
17:08:41 <ttx> aclissues is me
17:09:23 <hberaud> I see your name/color assigned this is why I asked you
17:09:25 <ttx> I ran it and it returned nothing to fix
17:09:38 <ttx> My bullet starts at "To catch"
17:09:38 <hberaud> ok thanks fair enough
17:09:39 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: Release Glance wallaby m-2 (22.0.0.0b2)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/771618
17:09:55 <hberaud> ahah sorry my bad
17:10:03 <hberaud> wrong copy/past
17:10:14 <hberaud> It's exact
17:10:33 <hberaud> So I think we can move on
17:10:44 <hberaud> Handle governance consistency issues => hberaud
17:11:23 <hberaud> so I discussed with the majority of the involved teams
17:12:04 <armstrong> I am available for any task that  can help
17:12:31 <hberaud> Concerning barbican, and the ansible roles, I didn't get a definitive response for now, I relaunched this subject this afternoon
17:12:44 <hberaud> armstrong: thanks
17:13:36 <hberaud> Always concerning barbican, they wait for an RFE for barbican ui, so I think we can leave that as it is for now
17:14:12 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: Release sushy 3.6.0 for Wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/771641
17:14:24 <hberaud> Concerning oslo and etdc3gw osloers agreed with that so I proposed a patch to adopt the independent model
17:14:26 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Train  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/771448
17:14:43 <hberaud> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/771383
17:15:22 <ttx> hberaud: yeah, it's ok if they don;t decide right now. It's good to track progress though, since those items can easily fall between the cracks and disappear
17:15:52 <hberaud> Concerning tripleo and opentack tempest skiplist, tripleo chose to abandon it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771488
17:16:25 <hberaud> Same thing for OpenStackSDK and js-openstack-lib https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771789
17:16:48 <hberaud> Same thing for monasca-* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771785
17:17:16 <hberaud> I just see that gmann commented on it, I'll follow that
17:17:49 <hberaud> and last but not the least rpm-packaging
17:17:59 <hberaud> We discussed about that today
17:18:53 <hberaud> And I think that either we need governance/SIG model updates or something else
17:19:21 <hberaud> Or our tooling should consider the SIG file too...
17:20:00 <ttx> well no
17:20:02 <hberaud> To see if projects are present in and then ignore it or give them a special status
17:20:08 <ttx> since we do not handle releases for SIGs
17:20:47 <ttx> i think the simplest is just to remove the files
17:20:49 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/releases master: Wallaby-2 Release for python-tackerclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/770903
17:20:57 <ttx> no need for a special case really
17:21:22 <hberaud> I was thinking to reply on the related ML thread (http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/019842.html) and to involve the TC to the discuss too
17:21:30 <ttx> Oh I was supposed to file those
17:21:34 <hberaud> but if you think that remove is enough then let's go
17:21:36 <ttx> but did not
17:22:11 <hberaud> the rpm-packaging team don't really care about this so...
17:22:30 <ttx> removing is the only way to fix it. We can't have all the history since they do not use openstack/releases anymore. So the choice is between partial history (which is blatantly misleading) and no history at all
17:22:48 <hberaud> fire!
17:23:03 <hberaud> ttx: do you want to handle that?
17:23:09 <ttx> yes yes
17:23:14 <hberaud> ok
17:23:18 <ttx> I just need to remember to do it. Will do tomorrow
17:23:40 <ttx> please action me on next week tasks to be sure
17:24:04 <hberaud> done
17:24:23 <hberaud> and that's all for task completion
17:24:32 <hberaud> anything else before moving?
17:24:37 <ttx> nope
17:24:44 <hberaud> #topic [TripleO] moving stable/rocky for tripleo repos to unmaintained (+ then EOL)
17:25:02 <hberaud> c.f http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/019860.html
17:25:37 <elod> I've replied (a bit late) to the list
17:25:49 <ttx> yeah I don;t have a strong opinion on that
17:25:51 <elod> I think it's OK to go EOL if they want
17:26:07 <hberaud> Tripleo's PTL asked if we can move tripleo repos for rocky to unmaintained and elod and myself proposed to move directly to EOL
17:26:39 <elod> well, they can leave the branch in EM for 6 more months,
17:27:00 <hberaud> My goal here is to grab your opinion
17:27:17 <elod> it's not a must I mean
17:27:57 <hberaud> You mean that they can't move for now?
17:28:07 <elod> it's a team decision if they want to wait or go directly to EOL
17:29:01 <elod> they can
17:29:37 <hberaud> Ok let's wait few days for that, I'll rediscuss with Marios soon if needed to see what they chose
17:29:38 <elod> it's just a buffer time (6 months - unmaintained), i would say
17:29:43 <hberaud> ok
17:30:20 <elod> so they can continue with the steps in the process ( https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#end-of-life )
17:30:36 <hberaud> I see
17:30:47 <hberaud> elod: thanks for your response/details on the thread and here
17:31:18 <hberaud> Anything else for this topic?
17:31:34 <elod> speaking of that... we might need to ask infra to delete the old, already EOL'd branches (like ocata)
17:32:04 <hberaud> ok
17:32:28 <hberaud> elod: do you want to handle that point?
17:32:43 <elod> yes, I'll add that to my TODOs :)
17:33:00 <elod> and look for EOL'd ocata branches
17:33:07 <hberaud> awesome
17:33:09 <hberaud> thanks
17:33:12 <elod> + ask infra to delete them
17:33:15 <elod> for a starter
17:33:20 <elod> np
17:34:08 <hberaud> I added it to the next week tasks
17:34:19 <elod> cool, thanks!
17:34:25 <hberaud> thanks
17:34:43 <hberaud> #topic reenqueue kolla job
17:35:35 <hberaud> I noticed that we surely missed to reenqueue this job and I want to confirm that point with fungi
17:35:48 <hberaud> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/019722.html
17:36:25 <fungi> looking
17:36:40 <hberaud> thanks
17:37:24 <hberaud> You replied on the thread but we didn't discussed together about the reenqueue part of this topic
17:37:58 <fungi> release-openstack-python succeeded there
17:38:13 <hberaud> Just to be sure to unmiss something
17:38:31 <fungi> we can't reenqueue the tag, as it will try to upload a new release to pypi
17:39:14 <hberaud> no the problem is not there
17:39:19 <hberaud> Sorry
17:39:27 <fungi> failures seem to be for kolla-publish-debian-source-aarch64, kolla-publish-ubuntu-source and kolla-publish-ubuntu-binary
17:39:38 <fungi> which someone would need to build and manually upload i think
17:40:09 <hberaud> The problem was on a docker registry limitation IIRC
17:40:29 <hberaud> Where the job reached the new registry limitation
17:40:40 <fungi> yeah, i'm not sure what can be done about that other than someone manually creating and uploading those images
17:40:53 <hberaud> ok
17:40:58 <hberaud> I see
17:41:32 <fungi> someone in the kolla team, in theory, has write access to their dockerhub org
17:41:40 <hberaud> ok
17:41:43 <fungi> so they could do that if they wanted
17:41:57 <hberaud> Nobody complained since
17:42:19 <hberaud> So I think we can consider this point on their side
17:42:31 <hberaud> Thanks for details
17:43:07 <hberaud> I think we can move on
17:43:13 <hberaud> #topic Assign R-11 tasks
17:43:56 <hberaud> Review any remaining milestone-2 exceptions - I think this is for everybody
17:44:22 <hberaud> Plan the next release cycle schedule based on the number of desired weeks - I'm already on it
17:44:34 <armstrong> want to add my name to #304 with @hberaud
17:44:46 <hberaud> armstrong: sure
17:45:37 <hberaud> I think I'll work on that on Tuesday
17:45:57 <hberaud> armstrong: is it ok for you?
17:45:58 <armstrong> ok
17:46:13 <armstrong> what time?
17:46:40 <hberaud> Around 1:30pm UTC +1
17:46:47 <armstrong> perfect
17:47:04 <hberaud> armstrong: Thanks for your help
17:47:38 <armstrong> @hberaud  my pleasure
17:47:39 <hberaud> and the two last item was already discussed previously and assigned so I think we can skip them
17:47:47 <hberaud> s/item/items
17:48:10 <hberaud> #topic Open Discussion
17:48:22 <hberaud> Anything else?
17:48:36 <elod> nothing from me
17:50:43 <hberaud> So I think we are done!
17:50:45 <hberaud> Thanks everyone!
17:50:48 <hberaud> #endmeeting