17:00:05 <hberaud> #startmeeting releaseteam
17:00:05 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 11 17:00:05 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'
17:00:11 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-relmgt-tracking Agenda
17:00:16 <hberaud> Ping list: ttx armstrong elod, damani
17:00:19 <ttx> o/
17:00:26 <armstrong> o/
17:00:26 <elod> o/
17:00:29 <hberaud> We're way down on line 324 now.
17:00:35 <hberaud> Will just wait a couple minutes for folks.
17:00:41 <damani> hi
17:03:15 <hberaud> Ok let's go
17:03:22 <hberaud> #topic Review task completion
17:03:32 <hberaud> Generate a list of intermediary-released service deliverables that have not done a release in this cycle yet. => Done
17:03:39 <hberaud> Only swift met the conditions => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774682
17:04:27 <hberaud> And vitrage-dashboard but they proposed new releases so I think we can abandon => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774683
17:04:35 <hberaud> Thanks armstrong
17:04:36 <ttx> I'd say it's unlikely that they will change (swift)
17:04:58 <ttx> since they have always been in the release-as-needed model
17:05:08 <hberaud> No idea, I'll see that after the countdown email that will speak about
17:05:38 <hberaud> Let's wait a bit about for feedback from them
17:05:51 <hberaud> Next task
17:06:01 <hberaud> Start a ML thread about recent release failures with tripleo deliverables on ussuri => Done thanks ttx
17:06:10 <hberaud> However you said that we need to reenqueue os-collect-config 11.0.2 and tripleo-ipsec 9.3.1 (or release 11.0.3 and 9.3.2 on stable/ussuri)
17:06:33 <hberaud> right?
17:06:52 <hberaud> Do you want to handle that point?
17:07:34 <ttx> I'll leave choice to fungi
17:07:44 <ttx> (between reenqueuing and rereleasing)
17:08:00 <hberaud> ok
17:08:11 <ttx> not sure how easy it is to get those refs
17:09:19 <hberaud> I would argue that releasing 11.0.3 and 9.3.2 is more straightforward
17:09:57 <ttx> well, we can do it, but that means 11.0.2 and 9.3.1 are nowhere to be found
17:10:08 <hberaud> Exact
17:10:09 <ttx> so it's suboptimal compared to reenqueuing
17:10:15 <hberaud> Yes
17:11:41 <hberaud> Well I added this point to the next week tasks I think we can continue for now. Let's wait a bit for fungi's feedback
17:11:56 <hberaud> We'll update the task accordingly
17:12:15 <fungi> yep, sorry, also on a conference call, catching up
17:12:20 <hberaud> np
17:12:47 <fungi> what was the failure condition?
17:13:03 <fungi> tags got pushed but pypi uploads didn't happen?
17:13:11 <hberaud> Good question, I don't really remember
17:13:47 <ttx> Tag was not pushed
17:13:57 <ttx> tag-release job failed before that
17:14:13 <ttx> That's the post job that runs on a openstack/releases merge
17:14:15 <hberaud> I wonder why I can't retrieve the point on our previous agenda
17:14:22 <fungi> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/020112.html
17:14:33 <fungi> that's a message i had saved to look into, but have been swamped
17:14:54 <ttx> So I'd say the ref that needs reenqueing in that commit on openstack/releases
17:15:08 <ttx> which should retrigger the post jobs
17:15:38 <hberaud> IIRC It was due to a lack of stable branches
17:16:17 <ttx> yeah we did fix the stable branch situation, but of course that did not retrigger those post jobs
17:16:26 <hberaud> Yes exact
17:16:58 <hberaud> So I think that reenqueuing could work now
17:17:08 <fungi> willing to give that a shot
17:17:27 <hberaud> Thanks
17:17:41 <fungi> so reenqueue those two openstack/releases changes into the release-post pipeline?
17:17:59 <hberaud> Hm yes
17:18:10 <fungi> should be able to do that once this call ends
17:18:52 <hberaud> Worth trying
17:20:12 <hberaud> I think we can continue, anything else about this point?
17:20:19 <ttx> nope
17:21:17 <hberaud> I leave the next week task to be sure to not forget that
17:21:30 <hberaud> #topic Socialize `test-release-openstack` nodeset switch to focal
17:22:17 <hberaud> Just a heads up about a recent change merged yesterday and related to our `test-release-openstack`
17:22:37 <hberaud> nodeset have been switched to focal
17:22:52 <ttx> what is the expected impact?
17:23:08 <fungi> a number of the release jobs themselves are already using an ubuntu-focal nodeset anyway, right?
17:23:17 <hberaud> I don't expect issue as all our jobs are already on focal, but worth to mention it during the meeting
17:23:25 <hberaud> Yes
17:23:38 <hberaud> AFAIK it was the last one on bionic
17:23:53 <hberaud> https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/commit/3310a349a4ecf8187f242b9a8fe7d62465f3e083
17:24:00 <fungi> yeah, it's just that opendev is behind on scheduling a default nodeset switch from ubuntu-bionic to ubuntu-focal
17:24:12 <fungi> i want to start pushing on that in the next week
17:24:16 <hberaud> np
17:24:25 <fungi> focal's already almost a year old, we should have done it sooner
17:24:57 <fungi> but setting it explicitly in jobs now is a good way to find out whether they'll break too
17:25:11 <hberaud> Yes
17:25:57 <hberaud> So if you observe strange behavior then remember that topic
17:26:13 <hberaud> I think that's all for this point
17:27:06 <hberaud> #topic Onboarding Elod
17:27:37 <hberaud> elod: thing promised thing due https://giphy.com/gifs/mlb-alds-2018-3Mb5hvWOLe8hq6gZHc
17:27:43 <armstrong> Onboarding going on here?
17:27:55 <hberaud> Welcome on board elod
17:27:57 <elod> :D
17:28:03 <armstrong> oh hahaha
17:29:00 <hberaud> Now I need to figure it how to give you the ACLs :)
17:29:01 <elod> thx :) I'll work on doing useful reviews :)
17:29:22 <hberaud> ttx: any idea ^
17:30:03 <ttx> https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/5c75219bf2ace95cdea009c82df26ca199e04d59,members
17:30:34 <ttx> I guess we can do a bit of cleanup too
17:30:43 <hberaud> Yes
17:30:49 <hberaud> Thanks for the link
17:31:07 <ttx> removing inactive members... although I'd keep Doug around since he still does reno reviews
17:31:31 <hberaud> Elod you are now in the list let me know if that work for you => https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/5c75219bf2ace95cdea009c82df26ca199e04d59,members
17:31:47 <ttx> ok that should work
17:32:28 <hberaud> evrardjp had officialized is departure during last cycle
17:32:30 <elod> hberaud: i have the +2, so it works \o/
17:32:38 <hberaud> \o/
17:33:38 <hberaud> I updated Jean Philippe
17:33:56 <hberaud> ttx: any idea about Kendall?
17:34:31 <hberaud> AFAIK she is more or less still active
17:34:43 <ttx> She has been focusing on her TC vice-chair role
17:35:28 <ttx> I'd ask her if she plans to take up core reviews again in the future, or if we can downgrade her to mere +1
17:35:39 <hberaud> ack
17:36:00 <hberaud> Then for now I think we are ok with the cleanup
17:36:18 <hberaud> WFY?
17:37:02 <ttx> yes
17:37:08 <hberaud> Ok move on
17:37:11 <hberaud> #topic Review countdown email contents
17:37:16 <hberaud> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails
17:38:38 <hberaud> I didn't speak about vitra-dashboard as they already gave us a response about cycle-with-rc
17:38:38 <ttx> hmm, that sounds a bit aggressive
17:38:50 <ttx> " In absence of answer by the end of R-10 week we'll consider
17:38:52 <ttx> that the switch to cycle-with-rc is preferable.
17:38:54 <ttx> "
17:39:08 <ttx> I'm not sure we can make that switch without any team feedback
17:39:25 <hberaud> Ok so we need to upgrade our doc
17:39:33 <hberaud> too
17:39:37 <ttx> Let me try to make it a bit sweeter
17:39:44 <hberaud> Feel free
17:43:02 <ttx> ok taht sounds a bit less definitive
17:43:10 <hberaud> Definitelly
17:43:23 <ttx> Otherwise looks good
17:43:36 <hberaud> I'll propose a patch for your doc to reflect that
17:43:39 <ttx> maybe we could say that we'll approve the Xena release schedule by DATE?
17:44:14 <hberaud> Yes
17:44:32 <hberaud> Deadline is next week, exact?
17:44:53 <hberaud> "Make sure the next development series name has been added to the data/series_status.yaml file."
17:45:00 <hberaud> Looks like yes
17:45:50 <hberaud> Yeah I agree we don't need to speak about 24w
17:46:01 <ttx> ok done
17:46:10 <hberaud> Awesome, I'll send it tomorrow
17:46:44 <hberaud> #topic Assign R-8 tasks
17:47:02 <hberaud> done
17:47:12 <hberaud> everything is already assigned
17:47:31 <hberaud> #topic Open floor
17:47:45 <hberaud> Anything else to discuss today?
17:47:53 <ttx> no
17:48:12 <elod> nothing from me either
17:48:54 <armstrong> nothing
17:49:13 <hberaud> OK, thanks everyone. Almost there!
17:49:37 <ttx> Thanks hberaud !
17:50:01 <hberaud> #endmeeting