14:00:04 <hberaud> #startmeeting releaseteam 14:00:04 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Fri Sep 3 14:00:04 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:04 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:04 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' 14:00:11 <hberaud> Ping list: elodilles armstrong 14:00:12 <elodilles> o/ 14:00:16 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-relmgt-tracking 14:00:23 <hberaud> We're way down on line 305 now. 14:00:41 <hberaud> Will just wait a couple minutes for folks. 14:01:05 <ttx> o/ 14:01:07 <diablo_rojo_phone> O/ 14:02:00 <hberaud> #topic Review task completion 14:02:43 <hberaud> cycle-highlights: Done by Helena https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522xena-milestone-3%2522+(status:open) 14:02:52 <hberaud> Wrong link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024535.html 14:03:21 <hberaud> For now only few teams proposed cycle-highlights 14:04:04 <hberaud> And all these patches are now merged 14:04:37 <opendevreview> Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-cinderclient for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806583 14:04:43 <hberaud> Next task was "release cycle-with-intermediary client libraries" 14:04:50 <hberaud> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522xena-milestone-3%2522+(status:open) 14:05:07 <hberaud> We only wait for cinder 14:05:27 <hberaud> I don't think that we will get reply from cloudkitty and mistral 14:05:55 <hberaud> so ttx, elodilles please can you double check these patches and I'll approve them (cloudkitty and mistral) 14:06:09 <ttx> looking now 14:06:11 <elodilles> (and cinder is there I guess ^^^) 14:06:19 <hberaud> Ah yes 14:06:29 <hberaud> I need glasses 14:06:33 <elodilles> :] 14:06:45 <hberaud> (or rest) 14:06:55 <elodilles> you must have been busy with the summary :) 14:07:34 <ttx> re: cycle highlights it would br great to have more very soon, as we start working on messaging 14:07:37 <hberaud> let's wait for CI with cinder 14:07:49 <ttx> maybe we could insist again in the weekly email 14:07:58 <hberaud> ttx: then I'll send another reminder 14:08:10 <hberaud> ah yes good idea 14:08:34 <hberaud> Then let's append this to the countdown email 14:10:03 <ttx> +1 14:10:37 <ttx> then maybe helena or diablo_rojo can do another email early next week with another reminder 14:10:43 <hberaud> +1 14:10:49 <hberaud> can't hurt 14:11:40 <hberaud> Next task was "Evaluate any libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle to see if it is time to transition them to the independent release model." 14:11:44 <hberaud> elodilles: This one was yours, do you want to bring something about this? 14:12:23 <elodilles> yes, so i've gone through the patches ( https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:xena-final-non-client-libs ) 14:12:43 <elodilles> and found 2 release with very little content: 14:12:51 <elodilles> * ceilometermiddleware - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/804657 14:12:54 <elodilles> * monasca-statsd - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/804665 14:13:12 <hberaud> indeed 14:13:46 <elodilles> and the content were generated patches only 14:14:19 <elodilles> should I propose a release model change patches for them? 14:14:26 <ttx> hmm 14:14:28 <hberaud> Next cyle 14:14:38 <ttx> re: monasca it's better to keep the lot at the same level if we can 14:14:58 <ttx> re:ceilomiddleware that may be a god candidate yes (next cycle) 14:15:04 <ttx> good* 14:15:21 <hberaud> I would argue that we could simply note them under our "things to change" and then check in few weeks at the begining of Y 14:15:26 <ttx> +1 14:16:19 <hberaud> Done 14:16:21 <elodilles> sound like a plan 14:16:24 <hberaud> I added them 14:16:41 <elodilles> just a silly question, where are the "things to change" thingy? o:) 14:16:59 <hberaud> at the bottom of the page 14:17:01 <elodilles> oh, i found it 14:17:08 <elodilles> thx 14:17:13 <hberaud> yw 14:17:27 <hberaud> So 14:17:35 <hberaud> Next task was "List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet and send a separate email targeted to teams with such unreleased deliverables" 14:17:53 <hberaud> I started a ML thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024534.html 14:18:18 <hberaud> Some of these teams released something immediately 14:18:26 <ttx> I guess requirements is a special case there 14:18:33 <hberaud> Yes 14:18:38 <ttx> same for patrole/tempest 14:18:58 <hberaud> indeed 14:19:03 <ttx> python-openstackclient should have been caught in the recent client lib freeze, no? 14:19:08 <hberaud> Yes 14:20:31 <hberaud> I updated the list http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-September/024583.html 14:20:32 <ttx> we force-release those on R-3 if there is no answer 14:20:44 <hberaud> ok WFM 14:20:53 <ttx> "On the Monday, generate release requests for all deliverables that have do not have a suitable candidate yet." 14:21:04 <ttx> so this is more of a warning 14:21:10 <hberaud> Yes 14:21:36 <hberaud> And the last item was "On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements by applying -2 to all open patches." 14:22:24 <hberaud> So at this point I'll start to applying -2 to the requirements patches that doesn't fit our policy 14:22:41 <hberaud> And that's all for task completion 14:23:14 <hberaud> One last thing 14:23:21 <hberaud> Please review the cinder patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806583 14:23:30 <hberaud> gates are done 14:24:21 <ttx> lgtm 14:24:34 <hberaud> reno suggested a major version 14:24:47 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-mistralclient for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806590 14:24:47 <elodilles> reno suggests major version bump due to upgrade notes 14:24:49 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-cloudkittyclient for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806584 14:25:08 <hberaud> "he python-cinderclient no longer supports version 2 of the Block Storage API. The last version of the python-cinderclient supporting that API is the 7.x series." 14:25:18 <hberaud> let's check these changes 14:25:25 <ttx> hah hm 14:25:38 <elodilles> though the 7.x version seems interesting 14:26:17 <ttx> well that means the 8.x is the brak 14:26:21 <ttx> break 14:26:22 <elodilles> is it just an updated release note from the previous release? 14:26:29 <ttx> not the 8.1 bump 14:26:47 <ttx> So I'd say we're good 14:26:59 <hberaud> yes you are right 14:27:10 <elodilles> if that was the intention, then probably yes 14:27:12 <ttx> accidentally right, but yes 14:27:22 <hberaud> it come from the previous release 14:27:38 <opendevreview> Maysa de Macedo Souza proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kuryr Xena highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807340 14:27:42 <hberaud> So we don't need a major version 14:28:14 <hberaud> Works for you? 14:28:31 <ttx> +1 14:28:39 <hberaud> Sold 14:29:35 <hberaud> ignition 14:29:49 <hberaud> #topic Assign R-4 tasks 14:30:04 <fungi> related, it's interesting to see the client libs dropping support for older api versions, but i suppose if people need to interact with older deployments they can use openstacksdk 14:30:08 <gmann> hberaud: ttx elodilles ack on patrole/tempest release. I am on it few fixes are pending but will do before deadline. 14:30:27 <hberaud> gmann: thanks 14:30:35 <hberaud> no rush 14:31:04 <hberaud> "List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months." Any volunteer? 14:31:11 <ttx> on it 14:31:15 <hberaud> Thanks 14:31:25 <hberaud> Thanks armstrong 14:31:30 <armstrong> Welcome 14:31:46 <hberaud> #topic Review countdown email contents 14:31:54 <hberaud> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails 14:32:47 <armstrong> ttx when will you be available for 14:32:52 <armstrong> The task? 14:32:57 <ttx> armstrong: not sure yet 14:33:06 <hberaud> ttx: a cycle-highlight section already exist at the bottom of the email 14:33:10 <armstrong> Ok keep me posted 14:33:12 <hberaud> (a reminder) 14:33:29 <ttx> ok good 14:33:40 <ttx> it's almost as if people were late before 14:33:48 <hberaud> lol 14:34:45 <armstrong> :) 14:36:13 <ttx> email lgtm 14:36:22 <hberaud> ty 14:37:43 <hberaud> sent 14:37:56 <hberaud> #topic Open Floor 14:38:13 <hberaud> Anything else to discuss today 14:38:15 <hberaud> ? 14:38:18 <elodilles> (a bit late, but the mail lgtm too) 14:38:25 <hberaud> ty 14:38:31 <ttx> nothing extra to discuss 14:38:40 <elodilles> neither from me 14:38:41 <hberaud> +1 14:39:37 <hberaud> armstrong: I'll ping you on monday afternoon (around 2pm UTC), is it works for you? 14:39:51 <armstrong> Yes 14:39:54 <hberaud> Excellent 14:40:14 <hberaud> Thanks everyone for joining. 14:40:20 <hberaud> See you next week 14:40:21 <armstrong> Thanks 14:40:27 <ttx> thanks hberaud ! 14:40:29 <hberaud> #endmeeting