14:00:05 #startmeeting releaseteam 14:00:05 Meeting started Fri Feb 24 14:00:05 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' 14:00:16 Ping list: hberaud armstrong elodilles 14:00:23 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-relmgt-tracking 14:00:37 o/ 14:00:42 o/ 14:00:43 We are around line 351 14:01:05 #topic Review task completion 14:01:18 1) Process any remaining client library freeze exception 14:01:28 https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:antelope-milestone-3 14:01:32 (will have to leave in 30min) 14:01:39 ack 14:01:51 so a couple of patch remains umerged 14:01:57 also not current on status 14:02:26 I think we can merge those submited by elod 14:02:33 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/874440 14:02:39 i think those are with broken gates :/ 14:02:46 ah 14:02:48 i suggested to wait if teams fixes them 14:02:55 ok 14:03:03 and apparently that did not happen :/ 14:03:09 then we should add a reminder for next week 14:03:13 and we are running late 14:03:40 it seems that sahara and monasca are completely abandoned 14:03:46 What if we merged those and propose a bugfix version later? 14:03:47 for example. 14:04:03 /merged/merge 14:04:22 so we have 2 option: 1) merge them as is, with broken gate 2) remove them from Antelope 14:04:42 it is late to remove 14:04:42 and as we discussed several times, the 2nd is not an option 14:04:49 yes 14:05:03 1) is your one 14:05:32 just a note: this will likely happen with c-w-rc projects as well (sahara and monasca) 14:05:57 and as I proposed before the meeting we could add this removal to the "things to change" for bobcat 14:06:06 yes 14:06:20 hberaud: i've added :) 14:06:26 cool thx 14:06:38 mentioned patrole, monasca and sahara 14:06:53 though this is probably a topic more for the TC 14:06:55 how is freezer? 14:07:01 better? 14:07:09 but we are carrying this cycle-to-cycle now :/ 14:07:26 well, freezer, zaqar, and some other projects are also very fragile 14:07:39 though their single core sometimes merge patches 14:07:45 I see 14:08:07 ok let's focus on patrol, monasca, sahara 14:08:28 and we will handle freezer and zaqar within bobcat 14:08:42 ++ 14:08:45 anyway, i'll merge the rest of the antilope-3 release patches (with broken gates) after the meeting, if no objection 14:09:01 WFM 14:09:12 thans 14:09:14 thanks 14:09:32 no problem 14:09:35 ok next task 14:09:43 2) Early in the week, email openstack-discuss list to remind PTLs that cycle-highlights are due this week so that they can be included in release marketing preparations (elod) 14:09:55 https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032322.html 14:10:09 so the mail have been sent 14:10:13 yepp 14:10:17 elodilles: do you want to add something? 14:10:17 and patches are coming 14:10:25 ok good 14:10:34 i've reviewed them 14:10:41 and +2'd too 14:10:55 so they can be merged too 14:11:07 cool 14:11:09 thanks 14:11:13 ++ 14:11:22 so please review them :) 14:12:09 ok 14:12:23 3) Freeze all cycle-based library releases except for release-critical bugs. Independently-released libraries may still be released, but constraint or requirement changes will be held until after the freeze period (all) 14:13:25 so AFAIK we got exceptions with oslo and with python-octaviaclient (IIRC) 14:13:44 and I think the last one is still opened 14:14:05 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/874864 14:14:08 and since we do release some other libraries during the week i guess those needs a formal mail too :S 14:14:12 and I just approved it 14:14:19 like the ones i'll merge after the meeting :X 14:14:29 yeah 14:14:43 i'll send an RFE mail with a list :/ 14:14:48 at least the RFE 14:14:56 thnals 14:14:58 thanks 14:15:07 ++ 14:15:19 ok next task 14:15:29 4) Propose stable/$series branch creation for all client and non-client libraries that had not requested it at freeze time (elod) 14:15:40 https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:antelope-stable-branches 14:15:56 so I still need to validate some of them 14:15:57 i've +2 all that can be merged 14:16:04 I'll do that after the meeting 14:16:12 thanks hberaud o/ 14:16:22 there are some with questions 14:16:25 I can do a round of reviews in the coming hours if necessary 14:16:42 thanks ttx too o/ 14:16:59 i've -1'd the ones with question 14:17:05 we can wait early next week for those with questions 14:17:17 hberaud: ack, sounds OK 14:17:48 note that that means we probably would have further lib releases and RFEs :S 14:17:59 yeah 14:18:03 :\ 14:18:25 anyway, I'll try to push those early next week 14:18:33 thx 14:18:40 np 14:18:46 and the last task was 14:18:53 5) List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months and send a separate email targeted to teams with such old deliverables to remind them to release (if needed) otherwise a probably outdated version will be used for the final release (hberaud) 14:19:08 https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032313.html 14:19:19 so 14:19:39 my main concern was about python-openstackclient 14:20:13 I wonder why I missed this one (and a couple of other) with the python-* patches last week 14:20:28 because its type is 'other' 14:20:33 and not library 14:20:33 and I wonder why our tooling ignored them 14:20:36 ah 14:20:38 or client-library 14:20:39 exact 14:21:01 else the others looks legit 14:21:10 i'm not sure why it is not a client-library 14:21:25 I don't remember why 14:21:30 was there some historical reason behind it? 14:21:31 me neither 14:21:31 it is a client, not a library, I guess? 14:21:38 surely 14:21:56 anyway its weird 14:22:04 frickler: we call them 'client-library' :) 14:22:17 the python-*client deliverables 14:22:26 https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#other 14:22:29 Merged openstack/releases master: Release python-octaviaclient 3.4.0 for Antelope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/874864 14:22:31 yes, those can be imported by osc, so those are libs 14:22:41 but osc itself doesnt get imported anywhere 14:22:49 i see 14:22:57 then there is the answer :) 14:23:27 could be worth to add a note somewhere 14:23:37 it's cycle-with-intermediary, meaning, can be delivered multiple times during the cycle, but no need to freeze them with libraries 14:23:55 but then, as I understand we are not late with the release here 14:24:05 yes 14:24:29 the only thing is that the SDK team needs to keep in mind to release it 14:24:37 hence our process caught it 14:24:50 the process: it works! 14:24:52 :) 14:24:56 exactly :) 14:24:59 :) 14:25:14 and that's all for our weekly tasks 14:25:25 ~o~ 14:25:37 #topic Assign next week tasks 14:25:52 evreything is already assigned 14:25:58 so next topic 14:26:06 \o/ 14:26:08 #topic Review countdown email 14:26:16 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails 14:26:54 March 3rd seems a bit late 14:27:06 should be March 2nd 14:27:16 right? 14:27:16 WFM 14:28:08 yes 2nd 14:28:09 otherwise lgtm 14:28:16 thx 14:29:44 yepp, LGTM, too 14:29:48 thx 14:30:09 sent 14:30:28 #topic Open Discussion 14:30:44 Anything else that you want to discuss today? 14:30:55 need to run 14:31:02 see you ttx o/ 14:31:05 o/ 14:31:06 safe travel! 14:31:10 ttx: see you, thx 14:31:32 i don't have anything in my mind 14:31:40 ok np 14:31:52 let's keep it short 14:32:07 Then thanks everyone for joining 14:32:13 #endmeeting