14:00:56 #startmeeting releaseteam 14:00:56 Meeting started Fri Mar 15 14:00:56 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:56 The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' 14:01:08 o/ 14:01:10 Ping list: elod frickler armstrong 14:01:19 \o 14:01:34 down to line 362 or so on 14:01:41 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-relmgt-tracking 14:01:57 #topic Review task completion 14:02:14 - Process any remaining library branching exception (all) 14:02:24 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:caracal-stable-branches+is:open 14:02:48 All merged it seems 14:02:57 \o/ 14:03:06 - On the Monday, generate release requests for all deliverables that have do not have a suitable candidate yet (elod) 14:03:32 Branch devstack-plugin-* delivrables: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912363 14:04:04 this one merged too 14:04:06 cycle-with-intermediary deliverables: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:caracal-cwi-not-released 14:04:53 Just approved the Swift one 14:04:57 that leaves the other two 14:05:38 for which we did not get Ironic PTL +1 14:05:44 i forgot to add a deadline in the commit message :S 14:06:24 we can ping JayF to get some attention there 14:06:40 and maybe force them on Monday if nothing happens? 14:06:56 (maybe add a message with a deadline there) 14:07:12 Axel Vanzaghi proposed openstack/releases master: Release mistral RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912407 14:07:13 iurygregory is handling ironic releases 14:07:13 note that the hashes are out dated too :/ 14:07:41 we merged a few patches yesteday 14:07:44 Merged openstack/releases master: Release tacker RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912436 14:07:45 how about adding hashes and a deadline :) 14:07:58 we plan on pushing today 14:08:05 perfect 14:08:13 I'm double checking the patches we have 14:08:24 cycle-with-rc that are not trailing deliverables and that have not done a RC1 yet: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:caracal-rc1-deadline 14:08:40 thanks in advance iurygregory o/ 14:09:30 We have a bunch getting merged right now 14:09:41 3 blocked with a -1 14:10:01 and 3 somewhere in between 14:11:26 The mistral one should be ready: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912407 14:11:50 yepp, as soon as the jobs finish 14:12:21 i can take one core review on me later today for this :) 14:13:04 Merged openstack/releases master: Release mistral-dashboard RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912406 14:13:06 Merged openstack/releases master: Release tacker-horizon RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912433 14:13:07 hmm, should doublecheck that the wanted change actually made it to that SHA 14:13:09 Merged openstack/releases master: Release zun RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912451 14:13:12 Merged openstack/releases master: Release zun-ui RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912450 14:13:42 Merged openstack/releases master: Release watcher RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912447 14:13:45 Merged openstack/releases master: Release watcher-dashboard RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912446 14:13:47 Merged openstack/releases master: Release skyline-console RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912431 14:13:50 Merged openstack/releases master: Release placement RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912427 14:13:52 Merged openstack/releases master: Release skyline-apiserver RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912428 14:13:59 a quick look at list-changes makes me skeptical 14:14:05 anyway, that's for review 14:14:29 so we need to catch a few stragglers on this one, as always 14:14:53 Anything else to add on that task? 14:15:39 (hash is the latest on the branch on mistral, but can check later a bit deeper) 14:16:06 - Send countdown email (ttx) 14:16:16 will do after review today 14:16:45 #topic Assign next week tasks 14:18:36 one more to go 14:18:55 i can take that if there are no volunteers :) 14:19:38 I prefer not to sign up for tasks beyond teh Monday one, as I'll be at conference all week 14:20:00 ttx: ACK 14:20:13 Same thing for me I don't have lot of bandwidth 14:20:24 Thanks elodilles ! 14:20:24 hberaud: ACK 14:20:28 #topic Review countdown email 14:20:38 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails 14:20:53 elodilles: hi! we usually don;'t have RCs for ironic 14:22:56 can't we just wait for the final deadline for the ironic release ? 14:22:59 cycle-with-intermediary instead of cycle-with-rc? 14:23:05 +1 to the email 14:23:08 Does the email look good? 14:23:17 email LGTM too) 14:23:18 rpittau: sure but you still need a release 14:23:41 looks like ironic made two releases so far during the 2024.1 cycle 14:23:46 rpittau: since we are in Feature Freeze already a release should be out 14:23:57 and a stable branch 14:24:09 i guess the question is whether the last ironic release that was made is what should be final for 2024.1 14:24:12 rpittau: so we have a deadline for cycle-with-intermediary deliverables as well 14:24:32 FWIW we are looking at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912369 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910843 14:24:59 last release of ironic shouldn't be the final for 2024.1 14:25:04 (bifrost and networking-baremetal) 14:25:05 elodilles: isnt the feature freeze just for cycle-with-rc model? 14:25:39 rpittau: yes it is. But we need to cut a stable branch from the latest intermediary release too 14:26:03 Merged openstack/releases master: Release kuryr-libnetwork RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912398 14:26:06 Merged openstack/releases master: Release kuryr-kubernetes RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912397 14:26:10 Merged openstack/releases master: Release ansible-role-thales-hsm RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912377 14:26:13 Merged openstack/releases master: Release adjutant-ui RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912373 14:26:16 Merged openstack/releases master: Release aodh RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912380 14:26:21 Merged openstack/releases master: Release adjutant RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912374 14:26:25 Merged openstack/releases master: Release ansible-role-atos-hsm RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912375 14:26:27 LGTM 14:26:28 Merged openstack/releases master: Release ceilometer RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912385 14:26:32 Merged openstack/releases master: Release barbican RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912381 14:26:41 OK for email, moving on to open discussion 14:26:46 #topic Open discussion 14:26:48 iurygregory: well, it's not the final, but there shouldn't be further featureful release, only bugfix releases, after the official, coordinated 2024.1 Caracal release 14:27:07 Let's address the bifrost/networking-baremetal confusion 14:27:49 iurygregory: new features can be part of 2024.2 Dalmatian after the branching 14:28:21 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910843 is about making a caracal release for bifrost that we can create a stable/2024.1 branch from and include in the coordinated release 14:29:05 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912369 is about cutting a stable/2024.1 branch frmo the latest release of networking-baremetal 14:29:15 we need ironic PTL+1 on both 14:29:18 ttx elodilles for bifrost and networking-baremetal we're ok, I added +1 14:29:32 perfect then! No more questions :) 14:30:28 The other thing we need to discuss I think are the two RFE'd changes 14:30:45 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912461 14:30:53 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912462 14:31:05 If we want to merge those that should be done ASAP 14:31:53 Looks like we'll have to make the call ourselves as the Requirements team is not available 14:32:27 yes, they wrote that they trust us :) 14:32:37 Personally i think those are fine (benefits outweigh drawbacks, and those are the only two red flags for release right now) 14:32:45 but then I haven't been following as closely as y'all 14:33:17 purely release point of view i'm OK to add them. i don't have the technical depth yet if it's OK, though 14:34:18 No objections posted on teh list discussion 14:34:41 I trust tkajinam for the technical depth analysis 14:34:56 elodilles, ttx would be ok if we do next week? we want to make sure driver libs have their release in place cc rpittau 14:35:13 re ironic release 14:36:12 iurygregory: i think it would be ok, not too late in the week ideally 14:36:53 +1 14:36:57 #link https://review.opendev.org/913273 Publish the 2024.2/Dalmatian key for future use 14:37:05 no rush but that should be safe to merge at any time, the corresponding project-config change is wip for now and won't be merged until the date listed (post-release) 14:37:37 ttx, elodilles tks! 14:38:01 OK I did +2 both RFE'd changes... I'll let someone else push the W+1 button for final confirmation 14:38:51 hash is not the latest on taskflow release :/ 14:39:00 ... 14:39:16 though maybe the relevant patch is merged and part of it anyway 14:40:22 (well, neither the latest on tooz...) 14:40:54 I'm fine with whatever tkajinam wants in them :) 14:41:12 minimizing changes in that late release is probably a good thing 14:41:39 taskflow hash is the latest hash in 2024.1 branch I believe 14:41:40 Any other topic for open discussion before we close the meeting? 14:42:20 just a short mention of the vwx status 14:42:39 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/913289 is a tooling fix 14:43:07 tooz changes after that proposed hash are ones for unmaintained branch creations so it should be safe to exclude them now 14:43:33 tkajinam: ACK, just approved the release 14:43:43 elodilles, thanks ! 14:43:44 Merged openstack/releases master: Release neutron RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912421 14:43:46 sorry for the congestion 14:43:47 Merged openstack/releases master: Release venus-dashboard RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912441 14:43:49 Merged openstack/releases master: Release venus RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912442 14:43:52 Merged openstack/releases master: Release trove-dashboard RC1 for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912438 14:43:54 Merged openstack/releases master: Release Swift for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912371 14:44:19 LGTM 14:45:21 tkajinam: +2+W'd the taskflow patch as well 14:46:03 thanks again ! I'll monitor release and req bump. 14:46:33 Alright, anything else? 14:46:59 maybe this patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/912456 14:47:10 any opinions? 14:48:53 I would agree to not add a deliverables file for that, maybe fungi can just tunnel this to the foundation ppl? 14:49:12 so it seems sunbeam is an incubating project but they want some cycle highlights 14:49:34 yeah, i can pass them along 14:49:42 frickler: yes, probably they should send those to Foundation stuff 14:49:51 fungi: thanks o/ 14:50:19 that said, if they are not part of the release, they should not get release highlights 14:50:23 (*staff) 14:50:36 We can mention the work in progress in the release messaging though 14:51:20 +1 14:51:24 Alright, let's close this! 14:51:30 #endmeeting