13:00:19 #startmeeting releaseteam 13:00:19 Meeting started Fri Sep 6 13:00:19 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' 13:00:26 Ping list: release-team elod armstrong 13:00:36 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/dalmatian-relmgt-tracking 13:00:57 o/ 13:01:00 we are way down at L353 13:01:04 o/ 13:01:08 (very jetlagged but here) 13:01:22 :S 13:01:43 \o 13:02:12 ~o~ 13:02:15 let's start! 13:02:25 #topic Review task completion 13:02:36 Process any remaining client library freeze exception. (all) 13:02:50 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:dalmatian-milestone-3+is:open 13:03:08 1 patch left ^^^ 13:03:21 I've updated it a couple of hours ago 13:03:44 i'd appreciate some review on that, and i think we can override PTL-Approved+1 13:03:57 as Hao was OK with the release 13:04:02 ack 13:04:22 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:dalmatian-no-merges+is:open 13:04:30 do we want to amend and add the stable branch creation right away? 13:04:30 this is empty \o/ 13:04:51 frickler: that's an option :) 13:05:00 let me add that 13:05:36 Merged openstack/releases master: [nova] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927929 13:05:38 Merged openstack/releases master: [ironic] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927935 13:07:38 Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-zaqarclient for 2024.2 Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927139 13:07:44 there it is ^^^ 13:08:42 thx 13:09:20 Merged openstack/releases master: [vitrage] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927951 13:09:22 Merged openstack/releases master: [keystone] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927943 13:09:25 Merged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927940 13:09:27 Merged openstack/releases master: [mistral] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927933 13:09:29 Merged openstack/releases master: [glance] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927948 13:09:51 just a note, that we had some client libs that had release this week, officially we should have RFE requests for them, but as far as i see their versions are bumped in upperc-constraints.txt o:) 13:10:41 i might drop an email with RFE's just for the record :X 13:11:11 I think this is a bit of unclear distribution of responsibilities, the reqs team will likely approve anything bot-generated based on release team approvals 13:12:43 frickler: hence we send the notification of '-2 all open patches [..]' o:) 13:13:09 but yes, these are some formal stuff and we had more 'late releases' recently 13:13:40 so we should have RFE mails for those anyways and we should have merged the version bumping patches anyways :X 13:13:56 Carlos Eduardo proposed openstack/releases master: [manila] Add 2024.2/Dalmatian cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/928281 13:14:05 elodilles: that notification explicitly ends with "... but do approve changes for new OpenStack deliverable releases." 13:14:25 note2: i saw that openstacksdk and oslo.policy's 'new-release' patches succeeded on zuul and they were merged last weekend \o/ 13:14:50 frickler: ah, you are right 13:14:58 Merged openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927947 13:15:48 nevertheless, the important thing is that we have the releases and they are bumped (except zaqarclient) already in upper-constraints \o/ 13:15:52 sdk is fine, osc isn't afaict 13:16:10 frickler: oh, so we still have one that is pending? 13:16:12 approved last one in topic:dalmatian-milestone-3 13:16:22 ttx: thanks o/ 13:16:53 elodilles: as mentioned last week, the u-c bump was abandoned. it needs fixes merged in osc and a new release made 13:17:34 frickler: ah, i see 13:17:47 i mismatched it with openstacksdk 13:18:07 so we still have one thing to keep an eye on :/ 13:19:14 frickler: by osc you mean python-openstackclient, right? 13:19:14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/925861 is the remaining fix iiuc (cc gtema) 13:19:18 yes 13:19:34 ACK 13:19:37 thx 13:20:18 #action release-team: keep an eye on python-openstackclient as it still needs a release and it's upper constraint bump as soon as possible 13:20:25 this ^^^ 13:20:30 +1 13:20:50 move on then 13:20:56 Merged openstack/releases master: [tacker] Create 2024.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927950 13:21:09 next task was: 13:21:12 Early in the week, email openstack-discuss list to remind PTLs that cycle-highlights are due this week so that they can be included in release marketing preparations. (elod) 13:21:22 #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/ZWB7UIZEGSYVU7Y5TEHXQ6INBFQPWZY4/ 13:21:25 mail sent ^^^ 13:21:49 and we got some cycle highlights patches \o/ 13:21:57 and some promises as well :) 13:22:44 hope we will have more as i guess marketing folks are eagerly waiting for them 13:23:31 Freeze all cycle-based library releases except for release-critical bugs. Independently-released libraries may still be released, but constraint or requirement changes will be held until after the freeze period. (all) 13:23:49 well, this was just a reminder && guideline for us ^^^ 13:23:57 Propose stable/2024.2 branch creation for all client and non-client libraries that had not requested it at freeze time. (frickler) 13:24:09 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:dalmatian-stable-branches 13:24:14 ah, that answers the question I had on the docstheme release, though 13:24:48 some branch patches still missing because late releases were made 13:24:57 I'll send those after the meeting 13:25:21 frickler: ACK, thanks, i'll be around to review and +W them 13:25:39 and thanks too for generating all the branching patches o/ 13:26:00 List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months and send email to them (see process for template). (elod) 13:26:13 #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/QBNRSPUROJYTF2E3TYZLRPL6WDZTAFXJ/ 13:26:22 i've sent it before the meeting 13:27:10 looks good 13:27:18 it's not a big list, hopefully we'll get releases soon 13:27:46 tempest is already proposed 13:29:01 (note that our script listed some ironic deliverables that were released quite recently, but i've checked those repos and removed from the list) 13:29:18 (but it maybe only because of my env, i'll check) 13:29:34 frickler: yepp, and that won't even be their last release :) 13:30:17 these were all the tasks for this week, i think we are pretty covered 13:30:52 say if you have anything to raise regarding the tasks 13:31:09 nope 13:31:19 then next topic: 13:31:24 #topic Assign R-3 week tasks 13:32:00 thanks ttx for chairing the next meeting o/ 13:32:52 i've added my name to the only task that is not for everyone, or taken 13:33:10 #topic Review countdown email for week R-3 13:33:29 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails 13:33:35 please review ^^^ 13:35:01 +1 13:35:09 thanks armstrong 13:35:13 looks good 13:35:35 then i'll send it later on today, as usual 13:35:56 #topic Open Discussion 13:36:13 anything to discuss? 13:37:18 opendev is bringing a new cloud provider on line, so just keep an eye out for unusual job failures 13:37:43 Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-zaqarclient for 2024.2 Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/927139 13:37:46 oh, good news \o/ thanks for the heads up fungi 13:38:10 we're watching it closely as well, but can dial it back/off if something goes wrong 13:39:08 when is that expected to happen? 13:39:16 it's in progress already 13:39:25 oh, good 13:39:38 we started with one node at a time late utc yesterday and ramped it up to 20 nodes an hour ago 13:39:52 nice 13:40:08 chances are we'll increase it more next week if it's looking okay 13:40:26 we'll ping you then if we see any issue 13:40:31 please do! 13:40:38 although it is not a completely new provider, just a new variant of rackspace, so I don't really expect anything to go wrong 13:40:49 cool \o/ 13:41:05 it's a ground-up redesign of their public cloud on entirely different versions, hypervisor, etc 13:41:13 and in a new region 13:41:20 :-o 13:41:23 on all new hardware 13:41:43 so it might as well be a completely different provider, aside from the people involved in building and running it 13:42:19 also it uses skyline for the webui, first time i've gotten to really poke at a production deployment of that 13:42:37 wow 13:44:46 thanks again, for the heads up, we'll keep an eye on our jobs then :) 13:45:00 anything else to discuss before we close the meeting? 13:47:00 mothing from me 13:47:10 if nothing else, then thanks everyone for joining the meeting and let's end now o/ 13:47:13 #endmeeting