20:30:01 #startmeeting requirements 20:30:02 Meeting started Wed Feb 27 20:30:01 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is prometheanfire. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:30:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:30:05 The meeting name has been set to 'requirements' 20:30:10 #topic rollcall 20:30:16 tonyb, prometheanfire, number80, dirk, coolsvap, toabctl, smcginnis, dhellmann ping 20:30:19 o/ 20:30:29 o/ 20:31:02 \o 20:31:10 As usual I'm multi tasking 20:31:27 #topic Any controversies in the Queue? 20:31:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/639340 20:32:00 as long as stable team is OK with it I'll remove my -2 20:32:18 it seems like they are (but no further branches) 20:32:28 That works for me. 20:33:27 ok, tonyb ? 20:33:37 prometheanfire: I just need to check why we block 2.20.0 and if that's appropriate for rocky 20:33:51 prometheanfire: but in general I'm okay with doign it on rocky 20:34:02 ok, I'll just remove my -2 for now and await comment 20:34:57 not a controversy but I've commented on concerns with https://review.openstack.org/639788 20:35:17 really don't want another opentracing/jaeger-client type of situation 20:36:44 Good comments on their PR. 20:37:26 They at least need to answer the new requirements questions on that review though. 20:37:45 #topic ptg 20:38:03 still don't know, probably a week or two out 20:38:38 prometheanfire: Well we shoudl do the brainstorming thing and if needed I can run any sessions 20:38:49 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-requirements-topics is the current idea list 20:38:55 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stein-PTG-requirements previous 20:40:19 prometheanfire: LGTM 20:40:24 Should we add the constraints redirect effort on there? 20:40:36 ya, probably 20:40:36 prometheanfire: I'll propose that forum session 20:40:46 cool 20:40:48 smcginnis: Yeah probably 20:40:56 infra has https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/2019-denver-ptg-infra-planning as well 20:41:16 #topic constraints redirects 20:41:18 tonyb: :D 20:41:31 :) 20:42:00 I'm going to open a discussion on openstack-discuss about the constraints stuff 20:42:24 ok, I think we need to know three things about it mainly. 20:42:28 1. how to migrate 20:42:32 2. how to maintain 20:42:44 3. how reqs team needs to maintain 20:43:47 Good to have a ML thread so folks are aware of it at least. 20:43:48 prometheanfire: Yup 20:44:04 I see that we have 2-3 options that I'll outline 20:44:17 cool 20:44:23 next? 20:44:29 yup 20:44:46 #topic open bugs 20:45:35 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/worklist/567 20:45:39 those are all the open tasks 20:45:59 I'll work more on the docs stuff but other then that we should be fine 20:46:19 Yeah l-c testing needs work 20:46:37 and probably will result in a bunch of manual patches to $projects 20:46:50 it was a real pain to get keystone working correctly 20:47:17 lance said he'd do that, I might bug swift people too 20:47:27 prometheanfire: Okay 20:47:38 since they started this :P 20:47:52 prometheanfire: I wonder if lance knows what he's agreeing to 20:48:02 prometheanfire: we can ping mattoliverau ;P 20:48:07 it's just the docs 20:48:43 prometheanfire: well that and fixing all the broken projects to do it right 20:49:01 that can be a follow on, but the story is just docs updates 20:49:06 * tonyb still kinda wants to provide a zuul template 20:49:12 not a bad idea 20:49:28 and fix the uses of UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE 20:52:09 #topic open floor 20:53:10 Nothing from me. 20:54:14 nothing here either 20:55:00 #endmeeting