13:30:47 <jpena> #startmeeting rpm_packaging
13:30:48 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Oct  8 13:30:47 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jpena. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:30:49 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:30:50 <jpena> ping toabctl, dirk, apevec, jpena, number80, kaslcrof,  rha, hberaud, sboyron
13:30:51 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'rpm_packaging'
13:30:55 <jpena> #chair sboyron
13:30:56 <openstack> Current chairs: jpena sboyron
13:30:58 <jpena> #topic roll call
13:31:09 <jpena> Remember to add any last-minute topic to the agenda at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-rpm-packaging
13:31:49 <hberaud> o/
13:31:59 <jpena> #chair hberaud
13:32:00 <openstack> Current chairs: hberaud jpena sboyron
13:35:13 <jpena> let's start with the agenda
13:35:20 <jpena> #topic stable/victoria
13:35:35 <jpena> We successfully branched stable/victoria :)
13:35:43 <hberaud> \o/
13:35:44 <sboyron> \o/
13:35:50 <jpena> I'm working on the RDO CI setup, I see the SUSE CI is already reporting
13:35:58 <jpena> I hope to have it ready by the end of the week
13:36:12 <hberaud> ack
13:36:13 <sboyron> jpena, can I help ?
13:36:36 <rpittau> o/ (bit late)
13:37:09 <jpena> sboyron: thanks for offering help, right now I'm trying to sort out the ordering details. You can see the current statuts at https://centos8-rpm-packaging-ci.rdoproject.org/victoria/repos/report.html
13:37:22 <jpena> I think it's under control, but I'll shout if I need help
13:37:26 <jpena> #chair rpittau
13:37:27 <openstack> Current chairs: hberaud jpena rpittau sboyron
13:38:03 <sboyron> ack
13:40:37 <jpena> let's move on to the next topic
13:40:40 <jpena> #topic open floor
13:40:50 <jpena> Is there anything you would like to discuss?
13:40:55 <hberaud> yep
13:41:12 <jpena> go for it ;)
13:41:39 <hberaud> I don't want to retrigger an already discussed topic but what do you think (u'all) about DPL?
13:41:56 <hberaud> Distribued Project Lead
13:43:21 <jpena> we discussed this option at the end of the previous cycle, but it never took off
13:43:40 <jpena> tbh, I don't see a big difference with the SIG status, and I'm fine with it
13:43:59 <hberaud> I agree
13:44:26 <hberaud> the major is to keep our release under openstack/release
13:44:34 <sboyron> my understanding is that DPL allow to still being under release scope
13:44:37 <hberaud> *the major change
13:44:58 <hberaud> s/major/main/
13:45:23 <hberaud> but I'm not against SIG either
13:46:06 <jpena> as long as we can keep the release process simple (I think we can if we create a team in gerrit with release permissions), I don't see it as a big deal
13:46:32 <hberaud> yep
13:46:37 <sboyron> sure
13:48:18 <hberaud> so if you didn't see any issues I think we continue in this way
13:48:22 <jpena> ack
13:48:32 <hberaud> that's all for me
13:49:21 <sboyron> as long as we can keep the release process simple (I think we can if we create a team in gerrit with release permissions), I don't see it as a big deal < do we know if we can create this team with this permission ?
13:50:11 <sboyron> Is there anything to automate related to this move to SIG ?
13:51:13 <jpena> sboyron: yes, I'll see where that is located in the project-config repo and propose a review
13:51:33 <sboyron> jpena, great
13:51:38 <jpena> once we have that, I think all we need to do is to add some upload-pypi jobs for the release pipeline in renderspec and pymod2pkg
13:52:25 <sboyron> k
13:56:19 <jpena> if there's nothing else to discuss, let's close the meeting
13:56:21 <jpena> #endmeeting