14:01:06 #startmeeting sahara 14:01:06 Meeting started Thu Mar 10 14:01:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vgridnev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:09 The meeting name has been set to 'sahara' 14:01:14 hello/ 14:01:14 o/ 14:01:18 hi folks 14:01:26 hello 14:01:31 Hi everyone 14:01:50 hi 14:01:55 Hello Poornima, welcome 14:01:59 hi 14:01:59 let's wait a little 14:02:20 crobertsrh, Finally saw you after a long time :) 14:02:33 Yes, our timezones don't overlap much :) 14:02:35 we need to enable chair ha mode, who can be additional chair? 14:02:49 hi 14:03:10 vgridnev: I can 14:03:22 #chair crobertsrh 14:03:22 Current chairs: crobertsrh vgridnev 14:03:39 so, let's start 14:03:42 :) 14:03:56 #topic 14:04:02 #topic Action items from the last meeting 14:04:09 #undo 14:04:11 Removing item from minutes: 14:04:11 #undo 14:04:12 Removing item from minutes: 14:04:18 #topic News / updates 14:04:28 any news folks? 14:04:42 I've mostly been going through the UI, poking at it to shake out bugs since the re-org 14:04:43 working on sahara-nightly jobs, testing ambari ha 14:04:50 no updates from me 14:04:59 update framework also) 14:05:10 I'm testing sahara right now, we've got some bugs in UI side 14:05:34 esikachev, could please post a link to bug with node groups? 14:05:36 looking in API v2 test shared by elmiko 14:05:41 same as Poornima 14:05:45 I'll take a look at anything you've written up. I should be able to help fix some. 14:05:46 vgridnev: sure 14:05:54 pgadiya_, :P 14:05:59 and setting up env for dev 14:06:24 bug #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/sahara/+bug/1555496 14:06:24 Launchpad bug 1555496 in Sahara "[UI] Cannot update nodegroups" [Undecided,New] 14:06:34 vgridnev: ^ 14:06:51 thanks esikachev 14:07:16 Poornima, pgadiya_: Definitely ask questions if you get stuck on something. 14:07:29 sure crobertsrh 14:07:41 sure crobertsrh 14:07:54 any news / updates? 14:08:24 uh, it looks like stable/mitaka was created for saharaclient 14:08:34 Yes, I saw that :) 14:09:13 do we have action items from last meeting? 14:09:30 I might have missed last week's meeting, so I don't recall 14:10:45 ok, let's move to FFEs 14:10:53 #topic FFEs 14:11:10 I see a new request for MapR 5.1.0 14:11:20 yeah, me too 14:11:46 crobertsrh, vgridnev where do we need to subscribe for FFE's 14:11:53 Typically, we seem to be fairly lenient on all things MapR 14:11:57 actually I don't have any objections on this one, I guess it can be granted 14:12:07 Poornima: The mailing list openstack-dev 14:12:13 * Poornima is subscribed to it 14:12:22 thanks crobertsrh 14:12:23 If you have a filter for [Sahara] in the subject, it'll catch all thing sahara-related 14:12:33 This request is from just this morning 14:12:48 sure will set the filter right way 14:12:53 pgadiya, ^^ 14:13:10 I think I would lean toward granting the FFE for MapR 5.1.0. 14:13:21 sreshetnyak, do you have objections on this one? 14:13:23 Good feature to have and it's unlikely to have any chance of breaking anything else. 14:14:23 apart from MapR itself 14:15:27 ok, I've added that to ether pad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-mitaka-ff 14:15:51 no objections from my side, but need to send email to openstack-dev with FFE request 14:16:05 Yeah, the email has already been sent 14:17:03 nice, I see 14:17:57 about resume stuff, it still on review with -1 14:18:18 vgridnev: I will update today 14:18:22 ok, anything else in this topic? 14:19:28 Nothing from me 14:19:33 #topic API v2 progress 14:19:45 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sahara/api-v2 14:20:13 Poornima, pgadiya any news in here? 14:20:37 or we can't move to the next topic? 14:20:48 can* 14:21:02 vgridnev, we are going through this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273316/ 14:21:11 we have taken 3 tasks from the lists https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sahara/api-v2 14:21:30 once the environment setup is completed, we will move ahead with the changes 14:21:36 Excellent 14:22:02 thanks pgadiya u saved my typing efforts:P 14:22:12 folks thats it from us at the moment 14:22:55 thanks! 14:23:05 #topic Scenario tests releases and launchpad project 14:23:11 good 14:23:45 we are discussed this with Mirantis local sahara-team yesterday and arrived the conclusion "need release sahara-tests like saharaclient and need create separated project on Launchpad". any ideas, objections? 14:24:01 A separate project might be reasonable, but it could actually result in fewer people paying attention to seeing the bugs reported there. 14:25:04 I'm +1 on the idea though, just noting that it'll be a little extra effort to see some of the bugs in the separate launchpad. 14:25:14 crobertsrh: i will announce this bugs on meetings) 14:25:22 heh, ok :) 14:26:04 if no objections, i will create a Launchpad project 14:26:20 in the near future 14:26:27 +1 14:27:06 thats all from me 14:27:25 esikachev: tempest tests are also move this project? 14:27:25 esikachev, just for sure: i think that sahara bug management should be at least included to management team in this project 14:27:53 vgridnev: yes 14:28:06 huichun: tempest tests have not releases 14:28:18 ops 14:28:26 sahara-tests? 14:28:32 huichun, what all tempest test are included where can we check those ? 14:28:49 huichun: sahara tempest tests? 14:29:02 tosky, have you started migration of tempest tests to sahara-tests? 14:31:34 vgridnev: not yet, sorry 14:31:46 vgridnev: I have only one question related to the history 14:32:18 right now, when people do such operations, they simply put the last version of the code to be moved in a review 14:32:46 now, given that I'm the one who complained for keeping the history when sahara-tests was created (thanks again esikachev for that work!) 14:33:17 I was wondering if I should ask infra if it's possible to have another import, but it seems difficult 14:33:46 another possibility would be to just put all the relevant commits as reviews - they shouldn't be too much 14:33:58 or we can simply ignore the problem and import the code as it is, without history 14:34:10 as you prefer, I accept any advice, and then I will operate accordingly 14:34:17 * tosky breathes again 14:34:36 heh 14:34:41 good question 14:35:50 esikachev, as far I know we did that import using filter branch, right? I think, if we will have small amount of commits we can propose that as reviews, otherwise we will need push permissions from SergeyLukjanov, maybe 14:36:55 yes, we are use the #links https://github.com/esikachev/git-splits 14:37:16 esikachev: i mean to to tosky 's migration of tempest tests 14:37:28 I think that we can return to this topic when SergeyLukjanov will be around, to be sure that is still possible 14:37:34 one way is a separate only "tempest" folder 14:37:54 I will prepare the filtered history and see how many commits are there 14:38:08 if they are around on the size of 10 or so, I will just push reviews :) 14:38:16 yes, let's wait of PTL) 14:39:17 ok, let's move to open discussions 14:39:19 #topic Open discussion 14:39:40 vgridnev: Nightly Jobs? 14:40:01 #undo 14:40:02 Removing item from minutes: 14:40:11 #topic Sahara nightly jobs 14:40:19 thanks) 14:40:30 esikachev, anything to discuss in this topic? 14:40:43 we are working on #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288015/ 14:41:12 but we have a ONE problem. trigger by time not triggered 14:41:31 do you have a ideas? 14:42:02 esikachev: what is the difference between the scenario-tests and the nightly jobs? Run different tests? 14:42:28 huichun: Now there is no difference 14:42:49 but i am working on #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285663/ 14:43:04 and other scenarios for nightly builds 14:43:08 nigthly job will triggered at some time each day to understand full picture of how sahara is working 14:43:21 huichun, ^^ 14:43:26 Are we expecting the nightly jobs to be more "stable"? 14:43:45 this will be the most full set of tests 14:43:49 vgridnev: clearly ^^ thx VG 14:44:19 crobertsrh: yes 14:44:37 I bet we don't have experts in infra right now 14:44:40 are there enough resources on the Sahara CI? 14:44:44 :( 14:44:57 sometimes jobs are a bit stuck in the queue when there are many reviews 14:45:15 it is true that during European night time the queue is more empty, but still 14:46:07 if there are enough resources, of course no objection for more jobs 14:46:12 as far as know at European night queue is almost empty. esikachev, am I right? 14:46:23 if you want to be notified about results from nightly jobs, send me a message on esikachev@mirantis.com and i am add you email to jennkins 14:46:24 where will the results be sent, as those jobs are not tied to reviews? 14:46:28 vgridnev: yes 14:46:36 oh, adhoc notification 14:46:54 in 3:00am is empty 14:47:08 Moscow time 14:47:30 ok, we have 13 min, let's move on 14:47:39 #topic Open discussion 14:48:06 anything else that we can discuss? 14:48:21 Has everyone heard about their Summit talk submissions? 14:48:40 I believe that elmiko had a talk that got accepted. 14:48:42 yeah, I heard that NikitaKonovalov got two talks approved 14:49:16 I think tmckay had a talk that was put on the "alternate" list 14:49:22 one of that with elmiko, as far I know 14:50:18 Nothing else from me 14:50:30 from me too 14:51:04 +1 to end meeting 14:51:16 ok then 14:51:16 +1 14:51:27 thanks folks for attending 14:51:41 Thx VG 14:51:43 #endmeeting