18:00:19 <vgridnev> #startmeeting sahara
18:00:20 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul  7 18:00:19 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is vgridnev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:00:23 <egafford> o/
18:00:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'sahara'
18:00:30 <vgridnev> #chair egafford
18:00:30 <openstack> Current chairs: egafford vgridnev
18:00:34 <elmiko> hi o/
18:00:42 <tosky> hi
18:01:15 <tellesnobrega> o/
18:01:26 <vgridnev> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda
18:02:36 <mionkin_> hi
18:02:52 <vgridnev> #topic News / updates
18:04:10 <vgridnev> my short status: plugins api in UI / some preparations before future newton-2 release (next week)
18:04:31 <vgridnev> summit talk preparations also
18:05:49 <elmiko> not much from me, a couple reviews... sadly, my time is mostly being consumed by non-openstack projects =(
18:05:59 <mionkin_> I'm working on designate research and research about heat abilities of designate records creation
18:06:09 <tellesnobrega> on my side upgrade to storm 1.0.1 is up, going to review CI patch today. python jobs compatibility with pyleus should go up to review later today or tomorrow as well
18:06:20 <egafford> Working on getting the configuration engine for the image gen CLI up and running; should be able to post for review shortly. Also summit talk prep (I owe you and Nikita feedback on the state of Sahara talk, vgridnev, and I'm working on an abstract about the image gen stuff.)
18:06:32 <tosky> trying still to fix the sahara CLI tests
18:08:09 <vgridnev> nothing else in news?
18:08:21 <tmckay> I put up a spec/patch for generalizing fp usage, holdover from last cycle. I think we're going to discuss later. Otherwise I have been completely absorbed in a diferent project
18:08:48 <egafford> tmckay: Yup, thanks. I think tellesnobrega is likely to take that over after his pyleus work.
18:08:52 <vgridnev> #Review priorities
18:08:59 <vgridnev> #topic Review priorities
18:09:00 <tmckay> okey doke
18:09:55 <tellesnobrega> tmckay, i will ping you if i need guidance on that
18:10:23 <vgridnev> newton-2 soon, let's concentrate our reviews on things ether pad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-review-priorities
18:10:29 <tmckay> ack, I was 90 through testing, just needed to verfiy that it doesn't break in a nova net env
18:11:06 <vgridnev> additionally, there are 3 changes in stable branches, 2 out of them needed to fix CI
18:11:41 <vgridnev> nothings else I guess in this topic
18:11:53 * egafford will review that queue after the meeting, yeah.
18:12:08 <vgridnev> #topic Refactor the logic around use of floating ips in node groups and clusters
18:12:17 <vgridnev> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336593/
18:12:36 <vgridnev> is anyone had a chance to view this spec?
18:12:57 <tellesnobrega> sadly no, not yet
18:13:13 <vgridnev> from my opinion it's almost ok, but we need to address issues with proxy nodes
18:13:35 <tmckay> the idea is simple.  essentially, whether or not fps are used should be settable in each node group, not application wide for all users and all node groups
18:13:56 <tmckay> this came up when I was experimenting with baremetal using a flat physical network
18:14:24 <tmckay> I had to change "use_floating_ips" to False and restart sahara to be able to launch baremetal clusters
18:14:30 <tmckay> got me thinking ....
18:15:00 <tmckay> vgridnev, technically I've handled the proxy nodes in the patch, but I agree that I need more words around proxy nodes in the spec for clarity
18:15:59 <egafford> tmckay: Yeah, I think it looks broadly totally fine. Do you want to update the spec, or have someone take that over? I know you've got some other priorities.
18:16:01 <tmckay> patch is shallow but broad, since fps are touched all over the place
18:16:11 <tmckay> egafford, I can update
18:16:20 <egafford> tmckay: Cool.
18:16:23 <vgridnev> so, probably additional option to enable proxies that (checked by default)
18:16:26 <tmckay> should be today or tomorrow
18:16:27 <vgridnev> ?
18:16:42 <tmckay> I think proxies will work as is
18:17:22 <tmckay> but, maybe a follow-on spec if we find a use case that needs refinement
18:19:42 <vgridnev> ok, seems like we should test that patch, to understand that everything is ok. So, probably I'll ask esickachev to make some tests of that
18:20:06 <tmckay> agreed, sounds good
18:20:20 <vgridnev> ok, thanks tmckay
18:20:34 <vgridnev> waiting for spec updates
18:20:45 <vgridnev> #topic Pagination
18:20:46 <tmckay> yep
18:21:02 <vgridnev> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336931
18:21:38 <egafford> So this is a fairly major breaking change. It's awesome, but breaks all our prior contracts.
18:22:29 <elmiko> yea, looked mostly good to me. just the question of sorting
18:22:42 <vgridnev> from my last review there are only some small issues on names of variables
18:22:46 <elmiko> apparently, i need to read it again ;)
18:23:45 <tellesnobrega> i think it seemed mostly good to me as well
18:24:24 <egafford> Ah, okay, I see. Cool; looks like this is backward compatible.
18:24:32 <egafford> \o/
18:24:39 <vgridnev> sure
18:25:28 <vgridnev> I saw that michael already uploaded a changes that implements that, but I have no chance to review that yet
18:25:45 * egafford loves the embedded hyperlinks for next and previous. :)
18:26:55 <elmiko> yeah, that's a good choice
18:28:25 <vgridnev> elmiko, do we need API v2 progress ?
18:28:35 <vgridnev> sorry, just missed that
18:28:45 <elmiko> i don't think so, but i want to get things moving again
18:28:58 <elmiko> i plan to look over the work that needs to be done, to see if we can get a plan together
18:29:14 <elmiko> i'm hopeful i can spend a day next week sorting through things
18:29:14 <vgridnev> ok, sure
18:29:24 <elmiko> if possible, i'll put up some patches for the smaller work
18:31:17 <vgridnev> ok, finally seems there are no major objections on pagination, so I think that we merge that as soon as elmiko and egafford will vote with +2, so moving on
18:31:59 <vgridnev> #topic Open discussion
18:32:25 <elmiko> vgridnev: ack
18:33:32 <NikitaKonovalov> vgridnev: I remember we wanted to go over nightly jobs again
18:33:38 <vgridnev> sad announcement: sahara ci is absolutely unstable right now, there are some issues with quotas; undeleting heat stack that are hangs in DELETE_IN_PROGRESS and so on
18:33:45 <vgridnev> NikitaKonovalov, yep
18:34:04 <NikitaKonovalov> the idea was to move liberty jobs from nightly to something like weekly schedule
18:34:51 <vgridnev> and additionally freeze liberty yaml scenarios to avoid testing against stable/liberty in sahara-tests
18:35:35 <vgridnev> and also, I thinking to make centos7 is default testing point for plugins like cdh and ambari
18:35:40 <NikitaKonovalov> yes it's very unlikely that we'll need to merge anything to liberty tests
18:35:58 <egafford> vgridnev: Yeah, centos7 is a sensible default on the centos side, definitely.
18:37:22 <egafford> We should be able to bring MapR up to 7 as well, hopefully (it is supported per their matrix.)
18:38:22 <vgridnev> egafford, yep, I'll ask maps folks about that
18:38:23 <vgridnev> http://paste.openstack.org/show/527027/
18:39:08 <vgridnev> so, that is the list of jobs are suppose we will have
18:40:35 <tellesnobrega> that seems reasonable enough
18:41:01 <vgridnev> if mapr supports centos7 we will include that also
18:41:17 <egafford> tosky: Thoughts on the test list? Seems reasonable. vgridnev: Yeah, +1 to MapR on 7.
18:41:33 * tosky checks
18:42:30 <tosky> I agree with moving to centos7 as much as possible
18:43:13 <egafford> tosky: "Oh please let's move to CentOS 7 ASAP" seems to be today's theme. :)
18:43:23 <elmiko> well, centos is kewl =)
18:43:41 <egafford> elmiko: Oh, centos is awesome. We're just talking 6 vs 7.
18:43:55 <egafford> Centos 6 is less kewl.
18:44:00 <elmiko> agreed
18:45:42 <vgridnev> seems that there is no objections
18:46:00 <vgridnev> anything else that we can cover in today meeting?
18:47:01 <tmckay> ++ on centos 7
18:48:09 <egafford> Nothing I can think of.
18:48:58 <tellesnobrega> me neither
18:49:04 <elmiko> +1
18:50:09 <vgridnev> ok, thanks
18:50:10 <vgridnev> #endmeeting