14:01:34 #startmeeting sahara 14:01:38 Meeting started Thu Mar 15 14:01:34 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tellesnobrega. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:41 The meeting name has been set to 'sahara' 14:02:09 I guess we are all here 14:02:15 #topic News/Updates 14:02:20 o/ 14:02:25 o/ 14:02:54 I'm currently working on plugins split from sahara core, I got a working version, probably need some more work 14:03:04 i'll need to leave a bit early, maybe at 47-48 minutes past the hour, if we make it that far 14:03:04 I'm also writing the spec for it right now 14:03:08 I would like to introduce a new sahara contributor to you all :) zchkun 14:03:18 that is great news shuyingya 14:03:23 hi zchkun :) 14:03:25 welcome 14:03:30 awesome! welcome zchkun 14:03:36 hi all 14:03:57 o/ 14:04:05 anyway, for my update, i'm working on the whole "admin manage everything" thing.... it's actually already coming along, i have a working prototype already (that was fast) 14:04:20 jeremyfreudberg, great to hear :D 14:04:49 I'm testing few patches (by Telles and Elise) that fixes the support for RHEL - and at least one is ready for merge 14:05:03 as news: the storyboard migration is coming... tomorrow 14:05:10 (if there are no issues) 14:05:11 I think shuyingya just merged the soci* one 14:05:15 I am working on finishing the tasks about hbase support. need install a master branch env to test patches. 14:05:25 shuyingya, thanks for that 14:05:26 tosky, cool 14:05:28 or at least he tried to merge, because THE GATES ARE BROKEN! 14:05:36 yes 14:05:48 some regression happened, infra people are waiting for zuul people 14:06:34 once this patch merges I'm proposing a few backports on it 14:07:24 any more news? updates? 14:07:58 in case people didn't notice (even if there is a report on the list), yesterday we had the virtual PTG 14:08:10 to complement and complete few points from the in-person PTG 14:08:19 I was going to talk about it on a separated topic 14:08:22 zchkun try to understand about hadoop 2.8.2 upgrade patches. He is going to do the hadoop 3.0.0 upgrade. 14:08:23 ah, oki 14:08:42 does anyone want to work on 2.7.5 upgrade 14:09:10 i can grab it 14:09:17 thanks jeremyfreudberg 14:09:23 if not, I think it would be a great opportunity for zchkun to understand the step to upgrade 14:09:52 if zchkun has the time and is willing to do it, that would be great 14:10:15 yeah, i'd say it comes down to who has more time.... although i'm certainly happy to do it 14:10:19 of course he can do it as a learning step and than work on 3 14:10:34 yes,I have 14:10:44 so better option is 14:10:58 zchkun, you take upgrade to 2.7.5 and if you need help you can reach out to jeremyfreudberg 14:11:01 is that ok with you both? 14:11:15 and shuyingy_ can also help out 14:11:18 that sounds right to me 14:11:25 ok, no problem 14:11:32 thanks 14:11:41 thanks zchkun 14:11:41 :) thanks zchkun 14:11:52 moving on to the next topic then 14:12:06 #topic Dublin/Virtual PTG 14:12:26 and for the future we should try to support minor versions (x.y.z) more and more for the same x.y of the plugin (if the plugin declares that it does not break the compatibility) 14:12:36 (sorry) 14:12:45 tosky, no problem 14:12:47 that is true 14:13:26 yesterday we held a virtual PTG to cover the topics that weren't fully covered in Dublin due to jeremyfreudberg not being able to make it (flight cancellations) 14:13:42 the outcome of that can be found here 14:13:46 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-rocky-VIRTUAL-ptg 14:14:03 the outcome of PTG is here: 14:14:08 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-rocky-ptg 14:14:46 yes, and thanks all for participating, i think it was a success 14:14:47 I have also written a summary of the PTG to openstack-dev, please read and ask question if necessary 14:15:35 jeremyfreudberg, it was, we can think on working a couple more of those through out the cycle to keep tabs and sync 14:15:44 things to think about it later on 14:15:55 not a bad idea 14:16:11 we can convert most of them in stories (with tasks) from next week, with storyboard 14:16:22 if there is no story/bug yet 14:16:22 tosky, yes 14:16:27 +1 14:16:45 the storyboard team will probably implement epics at some point - but for now we should leave just with stories and their tasks 14:16:52 I guess we can close this topic and move on to talk about storyboard a little 14:16:58 yup 14:17:01 #topic Storyboard 14:17:27 Not sure if you are all familiar with Storyboard, but it will be our new tracking system starting next week 14:17:49 storyboard team is working on migrating sahara this friday so we can start monday 14:18:02 bug numbers will remain the same from launchpad 14:18:20 tellesnobrega just my question. 14:18:35 where to find the bug number 14:18:45 I recommend we all take some time to read storyboard documentation and learn about all the storyboard features so we can make the best of it 14:18:52 shuyingy_, in storyboard? 14:18:55 yes 14:19:15 I should read the storyboard documentation first 14:19:25 shuyingy_, as we all should for sure 14:20:09 yes, and there are new commit message anchors as well 14:20:19 shuyingy_, if you go to stories, the list shows the number before the name 14:20:19 Story: (which will work the same as closes-bug, i think) 14:20:30 and I think there is Task: as well 14:20:40 not sure how partial and related bug will carry over (tosky?) 14:22:01 Story: is meant to leave a comment on the story when the patch is sent/updated/merged, Task: updates the task status (to Review, and then to Merged) 14:22:20 (SotK is from the storyboard team) 14:22:29 Story: also links to the story when viewing the commit message in Gerrit 14:22:49 (I say "meant to" as the commenting functionality is currently broken and being investigated) 14:22:58 (we know SotK well from how many times they are accidentally pinged by tellesnobrega ) 14:23:06 true :) 14:23:14 and the answer on related-bug partial-bug, how it will work on storyboard/ 14:23:15 ? 14:24:23 I'm not familiar with what those two do in relation to Launchpad 14:24:55 * SotK reads 14:25:52 basically they mark a patch partially fixes a bug, it doesn't mark it as done when merged but it shows up as part of the work 14:26:27 sounds similar to what just including Story: and not Task: does 14:26:27 well, maybe it means that we need to create more granular tasks 14:26:39 or what SotK wrote 14:26:41 yes, exactly, the bot will comment about a related patch / partial patch being proposed/merged, but not update the final open/closed result of the bug 14:26:49 so pretty close to what SotK says, in fact 14:26:53 cool 14:26:54 yeah, having more granular tasks would be my recommendation here I think 14:26:55 thanks SotK 14:27:05 (this time was not accidental) 14:27:20 since sb allows you to have more than one task (think bugtask in launchpad) against a given project 14:27:51 but either approach is fine, whatever works best for you :) 14:27:59 heh, yw 14:28:16 thanks SotK 14:28:22 thanks! 14:28:35 #action all team to read up on storyboard documentation 14:28:52 lets move on 14:29:02 #topic Open Discussion 14:29:33 I don't have anything specific to discuss here, anyone? 14:29:44 i encourage everyone to vote on the S naming poll 14:30:05 jeremyfreudberg, yes 14:30:10 https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_40b95cb2be3fcdf1&akey=8cfdc1f5df5fe4d3 14:30:22 i proposed a few good ones (in my opinion) 14:30:54 Summit will be held in Berlin, names are mostly in German, but some are nice 14:31:14 yes, this is the first time we will have a name that really feels foreign 14:31:43 (previously we had mitaka and ocata as foreign names but those didn't feel too foreign to me) 14:32:31 any other topics to bring up now? 14:33:08 I don't have anything to talk here :) 14:33:11 yes, just to be sure: vanilla/2.8.2 image generation, should we merge now and backport to queens? What did we decide? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/542184/ 14:33:38 tosky, good question 14:33:40 it would be nice to backport, if that's kosher 14:33:57 we can merge and backport it 14:34:31 shuyingy_: any comment on ^^ (your patch :) 14:34:33 ? 14:35:11 I think it is ready to merge. feel free to +2. haha:) 14:35:19 we have 2.8.2 on queens, it is best to have it on SIE as well 14:35:28 shuyingy_, done 14:35:46 \o/ 14:35:47 thanks, guys 14:35:57 of course, after a recheck when the gates are fixed 14:36:27 actually, my patch merged, so it might be fixed 14:36:29 lets see 14:36:50 oh 14:36:53 it depends on the job 14:37:09 devstack jobs (for sure devstack-tempest jobs) are affected 14:37:12 the gate queue for SIE is basically a no-op, it's just pep8 (everything else is non-voting and therefore excluded) 14:37:16 right 14:37:17 oki 14:37:59 anything else for today? 14:38:44 nothing from me 14:39:19 me neither 14:39:52 tosky? 14:40:00 nothing from me 14:40:21 I guess we can close for tday 14:40:27 jeremyfreudberg, we did make it in time :) 14:40:31 see you 14:40:35 yup 14:40:37 thanks all 14:40:38 o/ 14:40:43 thanks all 14:40:48 see you 14:40:51 #endmeeting