14:00:20 <tellesnobrega> #startmeeting sahara
14:00:21 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug  9 14:00:20 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tellesnobrega. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'sahara'
14:00:54 <jeremyfreudberg> o/
14:01:04 <tosky> o/
14:01:38 <tellesnobrega> lets start
14:01:42 <tellesnobrega> #topic News/Updates
14:01:52 <tosky> still working on S3 testing
14:03:18 <jeremyfreudberg> not much new to report from me
14:03:41 <tellesnobrega> from me neither, mostly reviews and will prepare cycle highlights and cut RC1 today
14:04:18 <tosky> I will be on PTO next week, so no sahara-tests release for now, but it's independent anyway
14:04:49 <tellesnobrega> ok
14:05:14 <tosky> I'd like t ocomplete this S3 support, but it requires some changes in sahara-scenario to support S3 parameters
14:06:26 <tosky> that's why I asked jeremyfreudberg about how how to pass the parameters for S3 in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589645/
14:07:04 <tellesnobrega> cool
14:07:23 <tellesnobrega> do we have any specific concerns for RC1?
14:07:38 <jeremyfreudberg> for rc1, i'd like to include my s3 doc patch
14:08:04 <jeremyfreudberg> the only other real patch we have is the fixing anti-affinity
14:08:12 <jeremyfreudberg> it may have to cause an rc2
14:08:22 <tellesnobrega> yes, no time for it now
14:08:32 <tellesnobrega> I will review the doc after this meeting
14:08:36 <jeremyfreudberg> cool
14:09:34 <jeremyfreudberg> zchkun_, how have you been?
14:10:35 <zchkun_> I'm sorry, no progress on my side
14:10:54 <zchkun_> it was delayed by other things.
14:11:03 <jeremyfreudberg> zchkun_, no problem
14:15:10 <jeremyfreudberg> topics for today?
14:15:45 <tellesnobrega> sorry
14:15:57 <tellesnobrega> I don't have specific stuff to discuss, I think tosky might have something
14:17:06 <tosky> I, uh, don't
14:17:23 <tosky> I have few jobs-related task after the branching
14:18:28 <jeremyfreudberg> i have some comments on boot from volume which we can discuss
14:19:21 <tellesnobrega> jeremyfreudberg, go aheaddd
14:19:29 <tellesnobrega> #topic boot-from-volume
14:20:13 <jeremyfreudberg> yes, so in rocky we added the ability to specify that an instance should boot from volume, as a node group template option
14:20:43 <jeremyfreudberg> we have another set of ngt options for additional attached volumes, which get used to back hdfs specifically
14:21:02 <jeremyfreudberg> for these attached volumes, we give a lot more configuration options:
14:21:38 <jeremyfreudberg> volumes_per_node, volumes_size, volumes_availability_zone, volume_type, volume_local_to_instance, volume_mount_prefix
14:22:09 <jeremyfreudberg> some of those aren't relevant to boot from volume
14:22:48 <jeremyfreudberg> volumes_per_node, volumes_size (for bootable volume, it comes from the flavor), volume_mount_prefix (a bootable volume has its own way of mounting, i think)
14:23:01 <jeremyfreudberg> but the other ones are potentially useful
14:23:39 <jeremyfreudberg> so we should have a brief discussion on how the interface will be for that
14:23:40 <tellesnobrega> true, we can definitely take a look and see how we can improve it
14:24:17 <jeremyfreudberg> basically the question is, should we create new options like boot_from_volume_type, boot_form_volume_az, boot_from_volume_locality, etc
14:24:47 <jeremyfreudberg> or should the current set of options for attached volumes also affect the bootable volume
14:25:10 <jeremyfreudberg> my own thought, is that we should create new options
14:25:32 <jeremyfreudberg> the user might have different requirements for the boot volume (for the os) versus for the attached volume (for hdfs specifically)
14:25:46 <tellesnobrega> I'm not entirely sure, I will have to dig a little more to make a decision
14:25:58 <jeremyfreudberg> yes, it will be in stein anyway, so we  can think
14:26:05 <tellesnobrega> it makes sense to have separated
14:26:44 <jeremyfreudberg> tosky-- any preliminary thoughts?
14:27:15 <tellesnobrega> but I want to double check, so we don't have too much stuff and complicate things
14:27:36 <jeremyfreudberg> tellesnobrega: yes, i agree with that too
14:28:24 <tellesnobrega> but it is good that you brought it up, we can take some time to look it up, understand the pros and cons
14:28:42 <tellesnobrega> and if we don't decide prior to PTG we have time there to talk about it
14:29:09 <tosky> probably better separately
14:30:09 <jeremyfreudberg> cool
14:30:40 <jeremyfreudberg> that's it from me
14:33:02 <tellesnobrega> I'm done as well
14:34:00 <tosky> nothing else from me too
14:34:07 <jeremyfreudberg> tellesnobrega, reminder to make the ptg etherpad
14:34:28 <tellesnobrega> jeremyfreudberg, it is on my queue
14:34:38 <tellesnobrega> probably get to it tomorrow
14:35:14 <tellesnobrega> thanks everyone
14:35:24 <tellesnobrega> we get 25 minutes back
14:35:34 <tellesnobrega> #endmeeting