14:00:12 <jeremyfreudberg> #startmeeting sahara
14:00:13 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jun 27 14:00:12 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeremyfreudberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'sahara'
14:00:32 <tosky> o/
14:03:17 <jeremyfreudberg> not sure if telles will join
14:03:21 <jeremyfreudberg> #topic news/updates
14:03:53 <tosky> we had a bunch of fixes approved
14:04:06 <tosky> saharaclient 2.2.1 was released few hours ago
14:04:26 <jeremyfreudberg> yup
14:04:27 <tosky> there are still few changes that could be merged, but waiting on Telles for them :)
14:05:02 <jeremyfreudberg> cool
14:05:44 <jeremyfreudberg> and tosky is also starting to work on pdf goal too, just to list another thing that tosky is doing
14:07:15 <tosky> oh, I simply tested it locally
14:07:37 <tosky> I think my question was not exactly perceived as such
14:07:41 <tosky> but I will ping them again
14:08:22 <jeremyfreudberg> you mean the bindep question?
14:08:51 <jeremyfreudberg> i only noticed that it was not directly answered; i haven't done any reflection of my own
14:10:48 <jeremyfreudberg> #topic open discussion
14:12:46 <jeremyfreudberg> so, stable core
14:13:06 <jeremyfreudberg> the two of us are already aware of the outcome, but i guess it's good to have it in the meeting logs
14:13:26 <jeremyfreudberg> any additional thoughts to add?
14:15:09 <jeremyfreudberg> hi tellesnobrega
14:15:10 <tellesnobrega> sorry I'm late
14:15:13 <jeremyfreudberg> no problem
14:15:14 <tosky> I'm just not sure about the criteria; I mean, I will follow the process and ask for review, but I'm not sure what I was missing
14:15:27 <tellesnobrega> have 2 meetings at the same time going on, this is my third
14:16:08 <tellesnobrega> anything that I help with?
14:16:28 <jeremyfreudberg> tellesnobrega: we're discussing the stable core stuff
14:16:34 <tellesnobrega> oh
14:17:52 <tellesnobrega> so, basically what I understood is, they didn't see enough history to approve you both as stable
14:18:01 <tellesnobrega> for the record I disagree with that
14:18:11 <jeremyfreudberg> yes, in my case in particular i actually don't have that much review history on stable branches
14:18:26 <tellesnobrega> you both have shown in your backports proposals and reviews that you fully understand the process
14:18:40 <tellesnobrega> specially on tosky's case
14:19:02 <tellesnobrega> but I guess we will have to be patient and you will have that really soon
14:19:23 <jeremyfreudberg> i can ask Tony to look again at tosky's history (a lot of stable reviews back in 2017 when there was more activity)
14:19:41 <tosky> jeremyfreudberg: even looking at the last year, I think I proposed most of the backports
14:19:50 <tosky> but maybe I didn't vote on the remaining ones
14:19:51 <tellesnobrega> true
14:19:54 <tosky> which were mostly automated
14:20:06 <tosky> but yeah, not really important, I was just puzzled
14:20:08 <tosky> anyway
14:20:27 <tosky> tellesnobrega! There are few pending reviews when you have a bit of time (especially sahara-tests)
14:20:28 <tellesnobrega> yeah me too
14:20:36 <tellesnobrega> will take a look
14:21:47 <jeremyfreudberg> btw, i won't be around for next week's meeting (4th of july)
14:21:50 <jeremyfreudberg> want to cancel?
14:22:04 <tellesnobrega> probably better
14:22:13 <tosky> oh, sure, np
14:22:38 <jeremyfreudberg> okay, i will send mail to the list
14:22:45 <tosky> when the pending reviews for sahara-tests are merged, as I mentioned earlier, I will propose a new sahara-tests release, if you are fine with that
14:22:52 <jeremyfreudberg> sure
14:22:56 <tellesnobrega> makes sense to me
14:22:58 <tosky> especially now that I properly added support for boot from volume '-_-
14:23:25 <jeremyfreudberg> hah, i liked your crazy way in the original patchset
14:24:32 <jeremyfreudberg> tosky: regarding that boot from volume patch, do you intend to add a template with boot from volume, and a ci job for it?
14:26:13 <tosky> uhm, not now
14:26:43 <jeremyfreudberg> okay
14:26:56 <tosky> I realized that the clean way for that would be extending the "features" feature, but that would need a bit of refactoring so that it does not apply only to jobs
14:27:36 <jeremyfreudberg> sure
14:27:40 <jeremyfreudberg> okay, anything else today?
14:29:09 <tosky> uhm, not from me
14:29:41 <tosky> we had a bug filed yesterday, but it was a configuration issue luckily (missing floating IPs)
14:29:49 <jeremyfreudberg> yes, i saw that
14:30:04 <tellesnobrega> me too, seems the usual no connection to instances
14:30:23 <jeremyfreudberg> usually when someone comes with a config issue they come back with another one later, so i'll keep an eye on things
14:30:49 <tellesnobrega> that is true
14:31:51 <jeremyfreudberg> if i understood the bug right, kolla sets use_floating_ips as false, but it doesn't provide the alternative (network namespaces etc)
14:32:16 <jeremyfreudberg> what i mean is, the default config in kolla is not ideal
14:34:18 <tellesnobrega> yeah
14:34:20 <tellesnobrega> makes sense
14:35:02 <jeremyfreudberg> hmm... https://opendev.org/openstack/kolla-ansible/src/branch/master/ansible/roles/sahara/templates/sahara.conf.j2 at least has use_namespaces as true
14:35:57 <jeremyfreudberg> https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_sahara/src/branch/master/defaults/main.yml#L123 -- OSA defaults are not great
14:36:17 <jeremyfreudberg> not a big deal
14:36:31 <jeremyfreudberg> it's not causing me to lose sleep
14:36:52 <tosky> we can always change the defaults in os_sahara
14:37:20 <jeremyfreudberg> yup
14:37:26 <jeremyfreudberg> okay, we can close
14:40:03 <jeremyfreudberg> thanks all
14:40:09 <tosky> thanks!
14:40:11 <tellesnobrega> thanks all
14:40:40 <jeremyfreudberg> #endmeeting