09:00:17 #startmeeting scientific_wg 09:00:17 Meeting started Wed Jan 18 09:00:17 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is oneswig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'scientific_wg' 09:00:47 #link Agenda items for today https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_working_group#IRC_Meeting_January_18th_2017 09:01:08 Hi 09:01:12 Blair sends apologies - data centre upgrade in full flow 09:01:25 Hi priteau, how's things? 09:01:41 howdy 09:01:51 oneswig: Going all right 09:01:51 Hi aloga 09:02:36 We were talking about Chameleon in Cambridge last week and would like to hear more about how it is done. I'll follow up offline 09:02:56 Morning all! 09:03:00 Hi StefanPaetowJisc 09:03:26 oneswig: sounds great 09:04:22 The items for today were on two broad topics - firstly, what's coming in terms of events and secondly, what can we do w.r.t federation for the Boston summit 09:05:09 Before all that though - if you're interested in being a track chair for the HPC/Research speaker track, the deadline for nomination is today 09:05:24 #link track chair nomination https://openstackfoundation.formstack.com/forms/openstack_summit_boston2017_track_chair_nominations 09:05:54 hello 09:06:02 started already ? 09:06:06 I've helped out for the last two cycles but I'm sure other people have better opinions on what makes a good talk :-) 09:06:11 Hi zioproto 09:06:15 welcome! 09:06:22 Just getting going 09:06:28 Ciao zioproto 09:06:32 hello all 09:06:37 covered the track chair nominations, that's all 09:06:55 sorry I have a very messy agenda today, I have to jump to another meeting at 11:15, is a nightmare ! :( 09:07:09 I came by because somebody was looking for me for datasets :) ! 09:07:21 No problem, a good WG member is a busy one 09:07:39 Flanders - hoping he'll join too but he's in Melbourne 09:07:44 I will stay as much as I can and I will read the minutes after :D 09:07:55 Great 09:08:03 OK, lets roll 09:08:09 #topic upcoming events 09:08:21 zioproto: while you're here, how's the operators midcycle looking for Milan? 09:08:30 dates are confirmed 09:08:35 15 and 16 march 09:08:49 Do you know if it has sold out? Agenda looks great 09:08:55 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup 09:09:02 I think tickers are not out yet 09:09:12 also Mariano from enter.it was looking for sponsors 09:09:30 there will be a mail on the ops mailing list when tickets will be out 09:09:40 usually that is on eventbrite 09:09:43 I don't see an eventbrite link in place yet, will keep watching the list 09:10:23 Anyone else thinking of going? 09:10:35 there is another important event 09:10:40 I'm interested 09:10:44 the CS3 conference in amsterdam organized by Surfsara 09:10:47 let me find the link 09:11:02 What is the scope of it? 09:11:02 https://cs3.surfsara.nl/ 09:11:42 so the conference is about sync and share 09:11:42 but there will be a OSO 09:11:43 session 09:11:51 OSO is Openstack Operators 09:11:59 o/ sorry for being late 09:12:16 Oops :-/ 09:12:16 Hi simon-AS559 09:13:16 simon-AS559: I was explaining about CS3 conference in Amsterdam 09:13:27 why it is related to openstack operators 09:13:29 Just looking for the programme but my wireless is dropping... 09:13:42 switch will present: Experience with running Owncloud on virtualized infrastructure (Openstack/Ceph) (continuation of talk at C3 2016) 09:14:03 and there is a talk from SURFsara: Manila, Sahara and Cloud integration in Openstack using NetApp NFS datastores 09:14:26 anyway a broadtopic there is Object Storage 09:14:35 so if you are interested in datasets 09:14:38 *nod* 09:14:40 you will find it interesting 09:15:21 OK Thanks zioproto 09:15:32 Anyone going to the project teams gathering (PTG)? 09:15:43 #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ 09:15:46 oneswig: not me 09:15:47 Feb 20-24 09:15:50 I have to run ! ciao ! 09:15:56 later zigo 09:16:01 later zioproto! 09:16:03 I cannot go either 09:16:09 Me neither 09:16:26 A few Blazar contributors will be there 09:16:38 I'm not going but one of our team will be there to work on Ironic and Kolla 09:16:55 priteau: is there a session on Blazar? 09:17:00 or for other things? 09:17:02 That clashes with one of my federation things, so no. 09:17:38 OK anyone for FOSDEM? 09:17:41 no 09:17:44 #link https://fosdem.org/2017/ 09:18:11 oneswig: Not any official one. Masahito is seeing if others are interested in a short ad-hoc meeting 09:18:32 FOSDEM looks interesting 09:18:37 Apparently there'll be a low-key presence at FOSDEM for OpenStack 09:19:11 One of our team is presenting at PGdays the break-out on Postgres - talking Monasca on Postgres 09:19:13 #link https://www.postgresql.eu/events/schedule/fosdem2017/session/1447-infrastructure-monitoring-with-postgres 09:19:43 I saw there was a call for someone to present OpenStack deployment with RDO/TripleO at FOSDEM 09:19:57 I'm not aware of any other OpenStack-related talks currently but plenty of tangential stuff 09:20:18 https://www.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/2017-January/msg00050.html 09:20:27 priteau: funny you should mention that - upgrading via TripleO is going on right now over here... 09:21:38 OK - other interesting events coming up? 09:21:52 oneswig: at FOSDEM in the CentOS Dojo there is also an OpenStack talk from CERN 09:22:09 #link https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2017 last one in the list 09:22:18 Hmmm... Networkshop in Nottingham in April but I don't think there's anything OS related 09:22:33 I can check with the organisers 09:22:45 priteau: https://indico.egi.eu/indico/event/3249/ 09:22:56 EGI conference in Catania (May) 09:23:12 this is a top-down event, but there's a call for posters 09:23:43 I don't know whether zioproto had mentioned the HPC Advisory Council http://www.hpcadvisorycouncil.com/ in Lugano in April; he has been asked whether we'd like to present OpenStack-related things there. 09:24:16 simon-AS559: No, not seen that - interesting. Will you do it? 09:24:52 I think zioproto has an idea for a presentation, I'll try to think of one myself 09:25:28 Sounds good, looks good too 09:26:09 If anyone wants to present there about OpenStack, especially with an HPC background, they would be thrilled to have you I guess. 09:26:18 aloga: The EGI conference conflicts with the OS summit alas - you're required in Catania rihgt? 09:26:19 zioproto or I could make introductions if necessary 09:26:28 oneswig: yes 09:26:40 simon-AS559: Could be interesting - I'll follow up offline 09:26:54 Good, thanks 09:26:54 oneswig: it conflicts and I must attend 09:27:18 I wonder whether emedLab would be interested, oneswig 09:27:24 aloga: too bad 09:27:30 oneswig: indeed 09:27:46 StefanPaetowJisc: I don't see them too often, but will check 09:27:56 Move on to the summit? 09:28:12 #topic WG and related activities at the Boston Summit 09:28:44 OK, so we need to plan space for WG activities but there's also something bigger which is closely related to the federation interests 09:28:55 Flanders, you there? 09:29:18 OK lets do WG activities first then... 09:29:51 How can we contribute to existing work on federation? 09:31:20 One area I had been thinking was to extend and refresh the ebook written last year - needs a chapter on federation in research use cases 09:31:28 oneswig: that is a really good idea 09:31:42 oneswig: federation is sometimes a too broad term 09:31:46 That makes sense. 09:32:05 oneswig: having a chapter shaping what federation means, or at least illustrating some use cases is a good idea 09:32:10 aloga: especially when it comes to OS 09:32:17 StefanPaetowJisc: +1 09:32:24 The topics previously have been about 10 pages of google doc, with pictures and case studies 09:32:59 Previously I've written the introductory body and had others review it and contribute case studies 09:33:20 but I don't know enough about federation to do a decent job of this one! 09:33:48 Two ways forward - somebody else drives it, or does a lot of reviewing of my text :-) 09:33:58 oneswig: I can help there, of course 09:34:09 Ok... we had a chat with eMedLab the other day so there's a possible study there. 09:34:11 oneswig: in either way we choose ;) 09:34:25 oneswig: I can help review, sure 09:34:33 Thanks both 09:35:10 Got a preference on how to work? 09:35:43 oneswig: maybe you can start with an skeleton on the contribution (even just a boilerplate) and then pass us the baton 09:36:02 oneswig: so that we know what you are expecting :) 09:36:06 aloga: +1 09:36:15 OK aloga sounds like a good plan to me. I'll take that on 09:36:39 #action oneswig to generate skeleton document for study on federation for research use cases 09:37:05 oneswig: another thing is documentation 09:37:19 for instance the keystone documentation needs a push 09:37:54 aloga: previously you've said the biggest shortfall is in documentation - is there anything we could do at the summit to share knowledge and experience, perhaps hands-on? 09:38:07 oh, forgot - you're not going :-( 09:38:15 That's been flagged up before in Barcelona 09:38:33 StefanPaetowJisc: are you making progress with Assent? 09:38:46 oneswig: I think that a sprint (or something similar) for federation documentation would be great 09:38:59 It's on the long list of things... 09:39:10 oneswig: at least clearly documenting the most common cases (say SAML, oidc, etc.) 09:39:26 aloga: agreed, but I'm not familiar enough to contribute 09:39:35 We've got several new features that I have to document so I've not given it much precedence :-/ 09:39:56 oneswig: I am reviewing the oidc specific stuff, so I can take that 09:40:04 oneswig: (I have to do it anyway) 09:40:04 And the macOS client is in progress so... 09:40:46 aloga: That's great, always better to have multiple benefits for one piece of work. Share and enjoy! 09:40:48 But there's documentation to use a helper script to get keystone tokens 09:41:08 With Moonshot that is. 09:41:11 StefanPaetowJisc: something you need or something you have? 09:41:13 maybe the WG could help reviewing it (you know, documentation is clear for the one that writes it, but maybe not for others) 09:41:48 aloga: feel free to add me as reviewer (I'm like a man in the street for this) - anyone else? 09:41:59 oneswig: great! 09:42:07 You can add me too 09:42:30 StefanPaetowJisc: thanks 09:43:13 The other activity discussed around the Boston summit is something being called the Boston Cloud Declaration - shall we cover that? 09:43:21 I really need to give OS my attention more. This will hopefully change after March 09:43:43 oneswig: sure! 09:43:44 StefanPaetowJisc: would be great to have you more active! 09:43:49 oneswig: indeed 09:44:23 I don't think I have a link for this but it's a policy-driven discussion on federation and sharing between research clouds that have a degree of open access to them 09:45:15 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Boston-Cloud-Congress 09:45:33 ooh thanks 09:45:34 Ooooooo! EGI and EUDAT would probably find that interesting. They're working on identity interfederation 09:45:56 StefanPaetowJisc: indeed, I've introduced EGI.eu relevant people to Flanders 09:46:26 however, it clashes with the EGI conference, so timing here is not appropiate 09:47:04 aloga: It would be interesting to know if EGI people would travel to Boston the following week, if it remained on 15-16 May? 09:47:30 That would need to be traded off against who would come to the summit but not remain an extra week 09:47:58 oneswig: yes, you're right 09:48:49 Perhaps a doodle poll is the way forward, I can't gauge it otherwise 09:49:25 The other question is whether this discussion could take place during the summit and be complementary rather than conflicting with other summit activities 09:49:41 oneswig: let me check beforehand with EGI people to see if they are willing to travel 09:49:56 oneswig: another option is a two-phase event, one in the US, one in the EU 09:50:16 aloga: the relevant people in EGI are aware of this effort, right? 09:50:22 oneswig: yes 09:51:14 I think there's more "decide the date" discussion to be had before a "save the date" announcement 09:51:42 aloga: can you let me know if you have a response and I'll feed back to Flanders and Khalil 09:51:50 oneswig: yes 09:51:58 OK thanks aloga 09:52:09 you're welcome 09:52:28 Anything more to add on this? 09:52:48 #topic any other business 09:53:00 None from me 09:53:10 So what's new everyone? 09:53:35 There is a thread on openstack-operators asking for feature requests for Pike: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2017-January/012428.html 09:53:46 Tim Bell has already replied 09:54:07 Other than the macOS Moonshot client making progress, but that's not strictly OS related. 09:54:28 I saw his mail - seems like some of the nested project and quota capability he's been looking for is developing 09:54:36 StefanPaetowJisc: Go Mac! :-) 09:54:42 Hahaha 09:54:47 oh - good to know quotas are coming :-) 09:54:47 Can't wait to get it on mine 09:54:57 Hi dariov, just in time :-) 09:54:58 (hello everybody, sorry - very very late today) 09:55:05 yeah, sorry 09:55:15 no worries! 09:55:39 We are doing practice runs upgrading TripleO and OSP 09:56:26 Got some interesting issues, hopefully they'd save somebody else some pain 09:56:30 ^^^ not exactly going smoothly 09:56:49 Oy vey! 09:57:02 ?? 09:57:22 we’re about to roll out a mitaka-based cloud 09:57:29 hopefully production soon 09:57:41 upgrade or fresh? 09:57:45 fresh 09:57:48 dariov: how are you doing it? 09:58:28 well, I know our ops guys got some headaches with that 09:58:35 but it’s up and running now 09:58:36 dariov: FYI Mitaka will be EOL in less than 3 months 09:58:54 we’re starting to run some compute there 09:59:26 we’ll see how far we go 09:59:51 priteau, our cloud guys were a bit scare to get on newer ones 09:59:54 Good luck dariov :-) got that "new cloud" smell 10:00:02 I would need to check with them why, though 10:00:12 OK bell has gone - lets wrap up 10:00:33 Thanks all, useful session 10:00:39 bye! 10:00:50 #endmeeting