21:01:18 #startmeeting scientific_wg 21:01:18 Meeting started Tue Aug 22 21:01:18 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is martial. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:21 The meeting name has been set to 'scientific_wg' 21:01:34 Hello everybody 21:01:41 Hello 21:01:44 I hope everybody is doing fine 21:01:56 Buonasera, @zioproto. ;-) 21:02:02 Evening folks! 21:02:04 Blair and Stig are on well deserved vacations without internet :) 21:02:45 *slackjawed* You mean someone actually managed to persuade them to go on holiday? 21:03:00 I "blame" significant others 21:03:07 hello 21:03:13 Hi Tim 21:03:27 ROFL 21:03:44 so we have a short list of topics today, so we can add extra items at the end 21:03:47 but basically 21:03:55 o/ 21:04:11 #topic Updated edition of the Scientific OpenStack book 21:04:36 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scientific-computing-book-update-2017 21:04:37 And it looks like Mr Hoge is here :) 21:04:52 Yes, new information from the last week, I'll update the etherpad 21:05:49 We're switching format, so editing should be easier 21:06:01 Diagrams need to be in AI format, we need an expert in that 21:06:23 Reminder that we're one month away from the HARD deadline of September 22 21:06:32 Are there any updates from the content side? 21:06:43 Do we need to schedule a meeting to organize that? 21:07:02 well Today's meeting was another call for volunteers 21:07:16 but you can see the list --so far-- at the bottom of the Etherpad 21:07:41 We should probably have a draft deadline in a couple weeks. I hate getting feedback then having to rush to integrate it. 21:07:44 I need to do the globus auth federation work before I can add the piece I said I would 21:08:45 jim: we need to think of a hard deadline for review 21:08:57 at least a week before 21:09:19 jim: do you think this is possible? 21:09:33 cool :-D I'm playing very much a deadline enforcer role here. 21:09:38 Maybe, pushing it here 21:09:44 Will try to get my hands on this... 21:09:54 I'm happy to facilitate in any other way you can direct me to 21:09:54 hogepodge: just to clarify, Sept. 22 deadline means whatever Kathy has on Sept. 22 is set in stone? 21:10:01 Jim: we can help by doing iterative review 21:10:13 stefan: please do 21:10:19 put we actually need to get it done Sept. 15 to review 21:10:25 ? 21:10:27 hello 21:10:36 Hello Robert 21:10:41 Yeah, the real real deadline is the 29th, but I'm saying the 22nd to emphasize that it _has_ to be ready by the 29th, no exceptions whatsoever, so the 22nd for final copy editing. 21:11:43 Mr Hoge, if you think we need a phone conversation to discuss content with possible content publishers, I am sure we can accommodate this 21:12:03 it is more a matter of getting volunteers for now 21:12:52 the people present here today is mostly our regular team 21:12:55 martial: ok 21:13:23 crowd ... I think if we want/need to outreach it, we should 21:14:02 maybe a post on the mailing list (although I believe it was done already) 21:14:33 and maybe our friends here can reach out to some of their colleagues and get some content 21:15:05 we do not have a hard deadline on pages I believe 21:15:38 martial: probably a good idea, plus a good plan and assignment of content :-D 21:16:11 I'll block out some of my calendar to do some of this... 21:16:14 even if it's just mostly a content refresh with a few new stories, that's good. Reflect the current state of the art in the sc community 21:16:21 okay I will send an email to the mailing list to be safe 21:16:48 i will have updates for Bridges and our move to Ocata Ironic and local boot 21:17:12 not sure if just a google doc is a good place for the content or if you want it directly in the etherpad 21:17:36 ah, I see a google doc linked in the etherpad. i’ll check that out 21:17:57 thanks Robert, I was just checking that 21:18:22 Robert: are you listed at the bottom of the etherpad? 21:18:36 stefan: thank you as well, we appreciate your help on this matter 21:19:15 yes, I’m in the updates section 21:19:21 Pierre: any update? 21:19:24 robert: thanks 21:19:39 I think we also ought to work on a reviewer process 21:20:10 ie assign people to review content when it is ready to do so 21:20:22 scratch "assign" ... "request" ? 21:20:40 :) 21:21:25 okay anything else on the book chapters to share? 21:22:03 Mr Hoge, we can have a email conversation if that is useful to you 21:22:27 seems like nothing, so I am going to move to the next topic 21:22:43 #topic ORC Update and planning 21:23:09 So I know Tim was at the last meeting, and so was I 21:23:33 the conversation is still ongoing and we are discussing the content at this point for presentations 21:23:43 there was a request for scientific content if at all possible 21:24:25 any idea/comment so far? 21:24:52 martial: are they encouraging remote presentations or just on-site? I can't make it to Amsterdam, but I might be able to put something together (or find someone who will) 21:25:12 both are welcome 21:25:18 You want scientific work being done using openstack clouds? 21:25:39 they are also trying to build the working group effort 21:25:50 and have created google group to start the communication 21:26:08 there next meeting will be collocated with the Sydney meeting 21:26:09 jmlowe: scientific use cases for open research cloud iirc 21:26:28 jim: actually ... (thansks Tim) 21:26:41 we have a pile of that 21:26:43 something that sounds a lot like jetstream ;) 21:28:07 Hmmm... Open Research Cloud, how is this related to the EOSC project in the EU? 21:28:27 well they are trying to built a global model with a lot of areas to cover ... more deails on the areas https://groups.google.com/a/openresearchcloud.org/forum/?pli=1#!forumsearch/ 21:28:42 Ahh, was about to ask for the Google Group name ;-) 21:30:01 ok, yep, we did nearly a whole day of use cases for our annual review, should be able to recycle 21:30:33 You can contact Khalil or Enol 21:30:51 Enol Fernández 21:30:52 I was profoundly unhappy with the meeting in Boston so I've been ignoring ORC 21:31:10 K Yazdi 21:31:50 jim: it is still an effort in progress and I expect it to be for a litlte bit of time, until they get the momentum needed 21:32:11 but there are a few people from Industry in particular that are interested in helping build a model 21:32:55 there was also a conversation about there being a more technical meeting right before the ORC meeting 21:33:11 and the briefs from that meeting being presented at the ORC one 21:34:47 I expect we will get more content as the weeks progress 21:34:54 martial: you mean https://wiki.geant.org/display/CISS/1st+SIG-CISS+meeting ? 21:35:15 yes thank you, I was looking for that 21:36:18 so that is that for the ORC update for now 21:36:21 Ahhh... was not aware of the second congress... Will run this past my management to see if I can attend 21:36:24 Thanks! 21:36:50 Tim and Jim, if you have content to provide and are willing to do so, feel free to contact Enol or Khalil 21:37:02 #topic Community Voting 21:37:20 so I understand that the vote is completed (I voted) 21:37:44 and unless I misread the results... congratulations Saverio 21:38:08 martial: thanks ! 21:38:33 can you tell us a litlte bit more about what it means, for you and the SWG? 21:38:51 yeah, congrats zioproto ! 21:38:54 sure 21:39:08 Congrats, Saverio! :-) 21:39:34 so I will be in the User Committee for a 1 year term 21:39:39 https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/ 21:39:54 The user committee is led by a core group five individuals, who provide oversight and guidance to a number of working groups that target specific areas for improvement. 21:40:26 It is still a lot to learn also for me, I had my first meeting with those folks yesterday 21:40:51 The user committee mission is to: 21:41:03 Consolidate user requirements and present these to the management board and technical committee 21:41:33 Provide guidance for the development teams where user feedback is requested 21:41:37 Track OpenStack deployments and usage, helping to share user stories and experiences 21:41:41 Work with the user groups worldwide to keep the OpenStack community vibrant and informed 21:41:52 I have done some cut and paste from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Working_Groups 21:42:08 so when do you sleep in all that? :) 21:42:40 yes it is a lot of work :) Lets see :) 21:43:07 It looks to me that it will be a very rewarding position 21:43:51 zioproto: are there any changes with the User Committee and the new SIGs? 21:44:44 trandles: I understood the User Committee is something that stays. The Working Groups (WG) are going to be replaces by SIGs in the long term. That is what I understood. 21:45:26 ok, good... :) 21:45:28 trandles: User Committee is at the governance level https://governance.openstack.org/ 21:47:27 Saverio, this looks to me that you will have a lot of good opportunities to make a significant impact, congratulations 21:48:14 Thanks. The experience running Openstack is that the gap between devs and operators is still big. I hope to make this gap smaller. 21:48:23 *applause* 21:48:34 If we are okay, after we are done, I would like to give the floor to Tim 21:48:59 Saverio: I look forward to your oversight and influence, Sir 21:49:17 and now before AOB 21:49:19 #topic SC17 21:49:24 Tim? 21:49:55 sorry Jim 21:49:59 I have the green light for a round of lightning talks in the IU booth just like last year 21:50:27 so, probably time to gather volunteers and start planning 21:50:27 that is great news 21:51:03 how "lightning are we talking about" 21:51:04 ? 21:51:27 I'll have 1 to 1.5 hours, so divide by volunteers and... 21:51:31 i believe last year they were 10-15 min each? 21:51:31 I am planning to be there, so I will be happy to contribute 21:51:52 i’m happy to give a short lightning talk as well 21:52:09 count me in if there's space 21:52:16 :) 21:52:27 excellent, surely there's an etherpad somewhere for this? 21:52:28 That's two 21:52:51 we had one for SC17 did we not? 21:52:57 let me check the meeting notes 21:53:02 It was the best attended and best received thing at our booth last year, so well done 21:53:03 We're happy to help promote anything from SC 21:53:30 We are all set to distribute updated books as well 21:53:43 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SWG-SC17 21:53:53 If you reach out to me I can be sure our marketing team tweets out and blogs timely info 21:53:55 I know PSC is in for books 21:54:11 yep 21:54:30 I can still ask about booth space for talks if we have too many for one slot of want a second go around 21:54:49 *or want* 21:54:56 w/e people would like 21:55:05 ok, marking you two down on the etherpad 21:55:12 I know GWU is going to be at SC17, I was going to go talk to them early september 21:56:32 jim: added myself as well 21:57:29 Jim: thank you very much for sharing this piece of information 21:58:11 np 21:58:17 well we are running close to the clock 21:58:24 #topic AOB 21:58:40 anything short that we need to discuss? 21:59:15 thanks for the meeting ! see you guys in Amsterdam at SIG-CISS for who will be there :) 21:59:29 ttfn 21:59:36 ttyl! 21:59:42 I hope to be there (and actually be mentally present) 21:59:43 later 21:59:46 See ya! 21:59:52 if not, thank you kindly for coming. Once again congratulations to Saverio and Sorry tim/jim -> John 22:00:22 #endmeeting