15:03:04 <gagehugo> #startmeeting security 15:03:06 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 28 15:03:04 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gagehugo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:03:09 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'security' 15:03:40 <gagehugo> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-agenda agenda 15:03:48 <fungi> around as usual, but also in tc office hour 15:03:50 <gagehugo> ping fungi gagehugo lhinds nickthetait browne redrobot 15:03:59 <Luzi> o/ 15:04:07 <redrobot> \o 15:04:10 <gagehugo> o. 15:04:11 <gagehugo> o/ 15:05:31 <gagehugo> only item on the agenda so far is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1811098 had some updates 15:05:32 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1811098 in Ceilometer "[SRU] ceilometer writing snmp credentials to log file" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Edward Hope-Morley (hopem) 15:07:34 <gagehugo> anyone else have anything new? 15:08:00 <Luzi> well i have a question 15:08:13 <Luzi> concerning image encryption 15:09:05 <Luzi> as it was way better to actually speak to other contributers at the last summit, then just to write specs and promote those... 15:09:30 <gagehugo> sure 15:09:37 <Luzi> were would be a good place for a forum discussion about the current stand and blockers for image encryption 15:09:45 <Luzi> ? 15:10:38 <gagehugo> Luzi: the openstack-discuss mailing list would be one option (if not already) 15:10:44 <Luzi> i also followed the ml-thread about pop-up-teams 15:10:57 <fungi> excellent, i did want to point that ml thread out to you 15:11:14 <fungi> i see the image encryption effort as a pop-up team 15:11:32 <gagehugo> same 15:12:28 <Luzi> okay, i was also being pointed to the option to have a forum session dedicated for this 15:12:39 <Luzi> the image encryption 15:12:44 <gagehugo> if you are attending the summit, then yes :) 15:12:47 <fungi> yes, proposing a forum session sounds like a great idea 15:13:00 <Luzi> i thought so too :) 15:13:13 <Luzi> but in which topic does it belong? 15:13:35 <fungi> the forum doesn't really have tracks, if that's what you're asking. it basically is a track unto itself 15:13:48 <fungi> (a track of the larger summit conference) 15:14:02 <redrobot> I'd think that's a security track Forum? 15:14:27 <redrobot> does this Security SIG (or team?) get Forum slots? 15:14:56 * redrobot just learned the other day Fishbowls are now called Forums 15:15:13 <gagehugo> redrobot: we have a slot for the PTG 15:15:28 <redrobot> Forums are part of the Summit though, not PTG 15:15:36 <gagehugo> the forums at the summit have always been unique though 15:15:45 <gagehugo> not really set into a track 15:15:49 <Luzi> well there are etherpads for gathering forum ideas right? 15:15:50 <Luzi> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Denver2019 15:16:21 <fungi> right, teams don't get reserved forum slots. everyone proposes topic ideas for the forum and then the forum session selection committee (basically chairs for the "forum" track of the summit) selects however many we can fit (which is usually all of them) 15:16:34 <Luzi> but if it would be okay to just propose a forum session, I will do that 15:16:43 <redrobot> Oh interesting. 15:16:44 <Luzi> fungi, ah okay, thank you :) 15:16:51 <fungi> forum sessions are ideally supposed to be cross-cutting topics which are relevant to multiple teams 15:16:53 * redrobot didn't learn enough about the Forum format 15:17:03 <gagehugo> https://www.openstack.org/summit/denver-2019/call-for-presentations 15:17:19 <fungi> redrobot: it came about when the ptg was first created, as the "feedback" half of what used to make up our design summit sessions 15:17:24 <gagehugo> from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum 15:18:09 <gagehugo> Luzi: imo this is a great forum topic 15:18:14 <Luzi> gagehugo, thank you too 15:18:56 <fungi> we basically moved the planning part of the design summit to the ptg and smashed it together with the working session concept part of mid-cycle events, but kept the feedback part of the design summit as a track of the summit conference 15:19:41 <fungi> though it gets muddy again now that we're doing the summit/forum back-to-back with the ptg this time 15:19:54 <fungi> rather than in alternating quarters of the year 15:20:15 <Luzi> thank you all, i will propose a forum session for the image encryption - it would be nice to see you there :) 15:22:24 <Luzi> that was all from my side 15:22:31 <gagehugo> Luzi: sounds good! 15:23:42 <gagehugo> anyone have anything else? 15:29:12 <gagehugo> thanks for coming everyone! 15:29:14 <fungi> oh, yeah 15:29:15 <gagehugo> #endmeeting